heartening to me to hear from people in response to my articles
about the murder of John Kennedy because it tells me that interest
in this crime of the century, this coup díetat against America,
is still strong and healthy.
article was no exception: I have heard from a lot of people, and
most of them, the vast majority, have been very supportive. But,
one person pointed out something that I missed, and it is absolutely
blowing my mind.
a look at the picture of Oswald.
Look at his
collar. His left collar is more clear than his right, so look to
your right. Notice that it is a double collar. There is a large
flap at the neck level, and then there is a longer, more tapered
flap below the neck level. And you can see the notch between the
two flaps. You could say that his shirt is designed more like a
Now look at
the picture of Lovelady.
Look at his
shirt. It has just one flap, right? And note that most menís shirts
only have one flap. Thatís the standard thing. To look closer, you
could try enlarging it. But, instead of using the plus button on
your picture viewer, which lessens the resolution, I find that itís
better to use a magnifying glass. But, there is definitely only
one flap there.
Now look at
the picture of Doorway Man:
shows the double collar very clearly. You could also call it a lapel.
There is a little lapel there, just like on a suit jacket. And it's
just like what we see on the larger picture of Oswald, who is wearing
a nice tweed shirt with a dressy lapel. In the picture above, you
can see the notch between the two flaps, and the two flaps together
give the appearance of a question mark. That's on the left side,
close to the column. I realize that it's small and subtle, but it's
still there- clearly and unmistakably. That little extra fold of
material, that little extension, that little tail, proves that the
Doorway Man can't be Lovelady because Lovelady is not wearing that
kind of a shirt. He is wearing a regular shirt with a simple collar,
the kind that characterizes 98% of the shirts that men wear.
the last picture, glance back and forth rapidly between Doorway
Man and Lovelady. Do it quickly and repeatedly, but focus just on
their collars. Try to dismiss everything else. And forget about
the picture of Lovelady from 1971. That was a staged shot taken
8 years later. It looks like they may have tried to fold his shirt
back some to make him look like Doorway Man. But, the picture to
the right of that was taken on the day of the assassination. And
clearly, there is just one flap to the collar and no extra lapel.
Its just a standard, one-collar shirt, as it most likely would
have been, and as most shirts are. Check your own closet.
It's not the
same shirt, so it's not the same man. There is no way that Lovelady
could be the Doorway Man.
Do you realize
what this means? It means that the Doorway Man was Oswald- unless
they can come up with another Texas Schoolbook Depository employee
who happened to look like him. And it means that Oswald could not
have been on the 6th floor firing at Kennedy.
that its over. Game; Set; Match. There is tons of other evidence,
but if there were no other evidence, this alone exonerates Oswald.
He could not have killed Kennedy.
How does one
go about contacting the Attorney General of the United States, Eric
Holder? Its time to reopen the investigation of the murder
of President Kennedy.
this article with everyone you know and also the Youtube video version
which can be seen below:
We need to
work together to take this video viral. To paraphrase Lee Harvey
Oswald, I need someone to come forward and provide me with networking
assistance. I need someone who is really savvy at using the social
networking sites, such as Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter. We need
to appeal to the young. They are the ones who will be most receptive.
And realize that exposing the lies about Kennedy's murder, which
have been shoved down our throats for almost 50 years, will challenge
the honesty and legitamacy of not only the government but also the
media, that is, the mainstream media. And think of what it could
do for Ron Paul's campaign. Who are people going to trust after
this? Gingrich? Romney? Obama? Heck no! This will stamp in people's
minds that the only honest, decent person among the presidential
contenders, the only one worthy of trust, is Ron Paul. Help me.