Talking to the Peace Emperor
by
William S. Lind
by William S. Lind
As usual, on
New Year’s Day I placed a call over my 1918 telephone to my reporting
senior, Kaiser Wilhelm II. I needed his wise guidance for another
year in this mortal thicket, and it was also a convenient time to
offer my felicitations for his coming birthday on January 27. It
took me a while to get patched through, as His Majesty was at the
Berlin Schloss rather than his usual residence in Potsdam. He didn’t
used to care much for Berlin, and I was surprised to find him in
so jovial a mood.
"Ach,
you should have been here today, Herr Generalfeldmarschall. Count
Zeppelen flew in in his latest airship, LS 10,000. What a sight
she made circling over Berlin! She holds 16,000,000 cubic feet of
hydrogen! I awarded him the Black Eagle."
"Please
give the good Graf my heartiest congratulations," I replied.
"He invented the only type of aircraft worth flying in. But
I’m just slightly surprised to find you’re still using hydrogen
rather than helium."
"Once
you’re immortal, what’s the difference?" His Majesty replied.
"Good
point," I said. "Was it Graf Zeppelin’s visit that drew
you to Berlin?"
"Oh, I’m
here quite a lot now. The heavenly Berlin is a far nicer place than
the version you’ve got down there."
"Better
weather, I take it?"
"That
and the fact that there are no Socialists."
"Your
Majesty, I would as always be grateful for your perspective. How
does our situation look from up there?"
"All too
familiar," the Kaiser said. "Your President Bush – we
call him Woodrow II at our tabagiecollegia – has found what
Nicky, Georgie, old Franz Josef and I also discovered, that it is
easier to get into a war than get out of one. The difference is
that none of us wanted war in 1914 and he did want a war with Iraq."
"What
advice would you give President Bush if you could meet with him?"
I enquired.
"Now there’s
a thought," the Kaiser said, laughing. "I would be the
Ghost of Wars Lost Past. Well, what I said to the Reichstag in 1888
comes to mind:
To foist
on Germany the suffering of war, even a victorious one, when it
was not necessary, I could not reconcile with the duties I have
taken on as Emperor of the German people and my Christian beliefs."
"Contrary
to Allied propaganda, Your Majesty was often derided within Germany
as the ‘Peace Emperor,’" I reminded him.
"Indeed,"
responded His Majesty. "As one of my recent biographers, and
one of the few fair ones, Giles MacDonough, wrote of the year 1909,
‘Every time Germany had drawn back from the brink of war in the
previous twenty-one years, it had been under the influence of William.’
Your Colonel House, after a meeting with me, wrote to President
Wilson in April, 1915, ‘It is clear to me that the Kaiser did not
want war and did not actually expect it.’ That is accurate."
"Unfortunately,
Hoheit, America is already in a war. What should President
Bush do now?" I asked.
"Here’s
what I wrote to Tsar Nicholas after it was clear he was losing the
war with Japan," the Kaiser replied:
Is it compatible
with the responsibility of a Ruler to continue to force a whole
nation against its declared will to send its sons to be killed
by hetacombs only for his sake? Only for his way of conception
of national honour? After the people by their behavior have clearly
shown their disapproval of a continuance of a war? Will not in
time to come the life and blood of all uselessly sacrificed thousands
be laid at the ruler’s door? . . .
"Would
Your Majesty do me the favor of sharing his thoughts on the larger
world situation?" I asked, knowing Kaiser Wilhelm was seldom
shy of sharing his thoughts on anything.
"While
your world looks very different on the surface from Europe before
1914, I think there is a larger similarity," His Majesty said.
"Your international order, like the one I faced, is inherently
unstable. Unfortunately, like us, your statesmen understand this
intellectually but act as if it were not the case. They, like us,
do not understand the risks they are running when they make bold
moves. America’s ill-considered commitment to Taiwan is one example.
It is very much like Russia’s commitment to Serbia; the tail can
easily wag the dog. America needs to handle its relationship with
a rising China the way Britain handled hers with a rising United
States instead of the idiotic way she dealt with a rising Germany.
What I wrote just before World War I applies now to you: ‘The British
should be clear about this: war with Germany will mean the loss
of India! And their position in the world with it.’ That’s just
what happened."
"Indeed
it did," I replied. "The British Empire now consists of
St. Helena and the Falkland Islands. So Your Majesty’s advice to
our statesmen would be?"
"When
you are walking on eggs, walk softly. And now I am afraid I must
run. The court theater is putting on a performance of one of my
favourite works, The Merry Wives of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, and
I don’t want to miss a bit of it. I think I’ll wear my uniform as
a British Admiral of the Fleet, just in case Jackie Fisher’s there.
Until next year, Hoch der Mittelmaechte!"
"Hoch
der Mittelmaechte!" I replied as the Kaiser rang off. Someday,
I thought, if I play my role well as the U.S. Marine Corp’s Liman
von Sanders, perhaps I’ll walk the deck of a Mackensen with
His Majesty. In the meantime, it’s a new year and the Turks are
waiting at my door.
January
6, 2006
William
Lind [send him mail]
is Director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free
Congress Foundation. The views expressed in this article are those
of Mr. Lind, writing in his personal capacity.
Copyright
© 2006 William S. Lind
William
Lind Archives
|