Why
Sudan?
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
By
this time, we have all learned a lot about the current Bush administration,
its predecessors and sadly, its successors. Let’s review.
- Oil is
important to Washington.
- Leverage
of oil production and policies is important to Houston and New
York, and Washington.
- Illusions
of national financial security must be maintained, at all cost.
- Holy worship
of the Federal Reserve and cultish market obsession with the
mental and physical health of Alan Greenspan is "a good
thing."
- Propaganda
works even better in the information age than before it. Before
TV and Internet, people tended to believe their own eyes and
trust their own experience. Today, we consume without assessment
massive amounts of "government" and other misinformation.
- Americans
like to be good guys, doing "good things."

Using
these "rules" one may explain Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan,
Iraq, neo-conservatism, much of the American left, and of course,
Sudan and the recent bill passed by the House "Declaring
genocide in Darfur, Sudan."
Sudan
is a place where, as in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, and many
other countries, bad things have happened, and continue to happen
on a daily basis. However, we may more easily understand the specific
question of Sudan by referring to what we already know.
Rule
1: Oil is important. Check
out the very current Department of Energy country analysis on Sudan!
Updated in July 2004, how about that!
Rule
2: Leverage of oil is important, and who leverages it wins
the prize! Because you have already reviewed the Department of Energy
analysis of Sudan, you know which government has been closely working
with the [evil] government of Sudan for years protecting and investing
in their oil industry. You also know which government has had Sudan
under sanctions for some time as a "terrist" country.
To make it easier, let’s call the two other governments, uh, I don’t
know…. China and the United States? And, oh my goodness, just last
year the darned French agreed to build a huge power project in Sudan.
If this scenario is beginning to sound vaguely familiar, welcome
to modern American foreign policy 101!
Rule
3: Illusions of financial security are sacrosanct. No problem
with including Sudanese genocide as part of the "problem"
in the Middle East, and no problem funding the war machine. Troops
are signing up in droves, and the economy has been recovering strongly
for years now. Check
out the good news!
Rule
4: Remember the Federal Reserve System and keep it holy.
Sudan may not count for much other than oil. But if you think about
China’s economic and financial interests along with the imperative
of Rules 2 and 3, it gets a bit dicey. Re-read
Gary North’s assessment of a few weeks ago for more insight.
Rule
5: Propaganda works, and government propaganda works even better.
The founders had reason to beware entangling foreign alliances,
because so many influential Americans already had them. People in
America, especially the voting class, had first-hand knowledge of
and maintained strong cultural, business, and familial links to
European countries. The concern was that people with first-hand
knowledge, experience and strong interests overseas would push Washington
in unwise foreign policy directions. 230 years later, the situation
has metastasized. In our unwatched Washington Petri dish, American
foreign policies are creatively designed and presented by those
with specific but often very private and often downright un-American
ideological and economic interests. The corporatists have settled
inside the beltway, and like busy little termites are devouring
the house. In the process, they are excreting massive amounts of
foreign policies like pre-emptive invasion and global law as long
as we make it and are conveniently the only ones not bound by it.
Without
a popular opposition to Washington’s corporatist agenda, we receive
American foreign policy as a kind of national male performance enhancer.
One needs not understand any problematic issues, enhance any communication
or make any honest appraisals of past performance and lessons learned.
One needs simply to take a pill each time we need to go fix some
other country’s government, as instructed by Washington.
Rule
6. Americans like to be good guys, doing "good things."
Rule 6 pairs nicely with Rule 5, and allows us to rationalize
so much for so long. Because no American remembers what it was like
to live under American troop-enforced martial law or fight a battle
on our own soil, no American has any idea of what that looks like,
feels like, and is like. We happily believe our occupations and
interventions are "all good" when government mouthpieces
and bureaucrats and politician tell us so. Sudan has a genocide
crisis in the southern and western portion of the country, in the
Darfur region. All "good" Americans want to do something
about it, so says the majority in the House.
No
offense to the Bush Administration, but genocide in Sudan (the House
version, not
the real life inspiration) couldn’t have come at a better time.
July
31, 2004
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final four and
a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives with
her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley, and writes a
bi-weekly column on defense issues with a libertarian perspective
for militaryweek.com.
Copyright ©
2004 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|