It’s
All About Style!
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
When
former Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet and acting
Chair of the National Intelligence Council Stu Cohen were asked
who inserted certain phrases in the unclassified National Intelligence
Estimate that did not exist in the classified NIE, they said they
"…did not know and could not explain [it]."
Far
be it from me to call great public servants like Tenet and Cohen
liars. Perhaps they are just being kind. Perhaps instead they should
have been asked who they suspected, and what they assessed, and
although they didn’t know for sure, what their gut told them about
who added and deleted certain phrases.
Phrases
that made all the difference in what the American people believed
about the danger posed by Saddam Hussein. Phrases that drip to this
day with the blood of American soldiers and marines who have died
in Iraq without reason or rationale.
A
key example is reported as follows:
The
classified NIE stated, for instance, that "Iraq has some lethal
and incapacitating BW [biological weapons] agents and is capable
of quickly producing … a variety of such agents, including anthrax,
for delivery by bombs, missiles, aerial sprayers and covert
operatives."
In
the unclassified version, the words "potentially against the
U.S. homeland" are inserted at the end of the statement.
This
statement even without the propagandistic and hypnotic "against
the homeland" mantra would be kind of scary. Except for
the fact that most of our key allies in the Middle East and elsewhere
have exactly the same capability. Frankly, it doesn’t justify war
with them, it doesn’t justify taking over their country or forcing
them to accept our permanent military bases. It doesn’t mean we
have to destroy their national library and rewrite all their school
books.
But
of course, the changes to the NIE – especially dropping terms like
"we assess" and any dissensions or concerns about what
"we assess" were all done "purely for stylistic
reasons."
Like
hell it was!
Perhaps
I am over reacting. The style of the Bush Cheney team has always
been characterized by aggrandizement and salesmanship. Bush has
his own extensive
track record of getting investors (think Arbusto Energy and
the Texas Rangers). After Cheney funneled his government expertise
into Halliburton, the
federal government became Halliburton’s primary feeding trough.
Well,
pigs have feelings too.
And
these feelings are clearly being protected by Tenet and Cohen when
they say they have no idea who changed the unclassified NIE in order
to justify a pre-emptive war with the American people.
This
war in Iraq is about many superficial and transient things, and
it lends itself to stupid non sequiturs like Robert Novak’s
favorite ploy on TV’s Crossfire! "You oppose the war
in Iraq. Do you support Saddam Hussein or George Bush? Choose now,
you guilty traitor!"
Sadly
the real reason we have an occupation in Iraq is because Bush and
Cheney and their neoconservative foreign policy gurus wanted it.
The Congress sat back calculating political benefit, Americans watched
football and reality TV, and the mainstream American media, like
baby piglets, greedily and vigorously sucked from the government
teat blind to the readily available facts before them.
Facts
now coming to light.
Bush
and Cheney wanted to be in Iraq, to control its government, and
to have permanent military bases just in case Saudi oil really is
tapped out, and Iraq is not the number two like we all thought,
but the number one draft pick. They wanted it in order to ensure
that our best socialist Cold War ally can continue to build its
wall and nurture its nukes and conduct its business unfettered by
the concerns of its Middle Eastern neighbors.
What
are a few lies and embellishments when you really want something
so bad you can taste it?
As
they promised during the 2000 campaign, Bush and Cheney returned
values to the White House, and that’s not just stylistic. After
eight years of a President who advocated doing whatever you want
if it is convenient and feels good, the new value statement added
a phrase: "and make sure someone else is paying for it."
Bush
and Cheney have delivered skyrocketing deficits and long-term debt,
an economic recovery that produces fewer and fewer jobs and increased
local and state tax burdens for young and old alike, an Army stretched
to threads, a pointless and costly adventure in Iraq, and still
no Osama bin Laden but plenty more terrorist threats.
Bush
and Cheney have made Bill Clinton look noble. Perhaps that’s why
George Tenet is protecting them.
July
12, 2004
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final four and
a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives with
her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley, and writes a
bi-weekly column on defense issues with a libertarian perspective
for militaryweek.com.
Copyright ©
2004 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|