A Salute
to Joe Darby, Sam Provance and Jim Massey
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
Army
Reserve Specialist Joe Darby, Army Staff Sergeant Samuel Provance,
and Marine Staff Sergeant Jim Massey are the kind of soldiers and
marines we need to recruit in droves.
Darby,
knowing what he was seeing in Abu Ghraib was wrong, said something
about it and then took action to stop it. It
worked.
Provance,
after he was interviewed as part of the Army investigation into
the abuses in part exposed by Darby’s actions, suspected a cover-up.
He may have been wrong about that, but he followed his conscience
in publicly saying what he heard in the 302nd Military Intelligence
Battalion regarding abuses inside the prison. It
worked.
After
leaving the Marines, SSgt Jim Massey is speaking out about
the actions he and his platoon took in Iraq, specifically in
terms of civilian casualties and un-gentlemanly behavior on the
battlefield. Massey’s participant account of what Iraq is really
like on the ground obviously contradicts the official storyline.
He is therefore a pariah.
Darby,
Provance and Massey are notably NOT among the best loved of American
soldiers and marines, at least within the higher reaches of the
Department of Defense. If they were, you would hear about their
public invitations to meet with and be congratulated by General
Richard Myers and Secretary Rumsfeld. Instead, Darby has been threatened
with prosecution for failing to report a crime, and Provance is
now reportedly redlined for honors, awards and promotions, with
his security clearance suspended. Massey is simply a guy who had
problems, and still does, according to the official organs.
For
those who understand how large governments tend to work, whether
in the time of the Caesars and King Herod, or Stalin and Mao, or
future/present times as envisioned by George Orwell, whom the state
will love and whom it will hate is predictable and consistent.
The
state will love the ones who do what they are told, quietly and
without resistance or questions.
The
state will adore the cravenly enthusiastic ones, who for a silvery
piece of no-risk, no responsibility advantage over their neighbors,
will do whatever the state asks, and even think up new tricks to
please their master.
The
state especially enjoys the morally minded ones who mistakenly put
faith in the higher virtue of the state, and those who feel that
somehow God guides the state in some special way unique from and
above the way He guides the individual within the apparatus.
On
the other hand, the state hates the noisy ones who think they are
right, or have rights.
The
state despises the backboned unimpressed ones, who quietly resist
while doing the best work they can.
It
becomes angry to the point of rage with those who suggest the state
isn’t really all about all those virtues it keeps yacking about.
Liberty, freedom, truth, justice and the American way, that kind
of thing.
The
state detests the independent ones, in part because it finds them
so necessary to produce the wealth that fuels its coprophagic existence.
What
is the secret of the Darbys, the Provances, and the Masseys? And
if we knew those secrets, could we somehow grow more of these guys?
Darby
was remembered by friends and family as someone who "has an
independent streak and knew ‘right from wrong.’" His high school
football coach said, "He
wasn't one that went along with his peers."
Instead
of telling our children to try to behave like everyone else, keep
their head down, don’t ask too many questions, fit in, even prescribing
prescription drugs to soothe their advent into the group, maybe
we should just say, "Tell me about it."
We
might want to consider promoting thinking for oneself at an early
age. As television induces intellectual passivity, perhaps we ought
not let our children be entertained by it too often. And independence
doesn’t mean mannerless children. As Claes
Ryn recently pointed out, children with manners are in fact
non-conforming oddities.
The
public school system is dominated by the kinds of people the state
likes. In particular, über-patriotic feminized robots for whom an
articulate challenge to state authority is far more sinful and dangerous
than breaking any of the six or eight or ten commandments. Perhaps
we ought to send our children forth only as if to battle, and barring
that, find an alternative to a state indoctrination in the tender
years before they are capable of fighting back.
Where
did we find such men? Waynesville, North Carolina. Jenners, Pennsylvania.
Williamsburg, Virginia.
I
grew up in North Carolina, not far from Waynesville. My hometown
of Brevard seemed small to me when I signed up with the Air Force.
I bet Joe and Jimmy and Sam felt the same way at one time. But they
brought the best part of community, neighborliness, and love of
country with them to the Army, the Marines, to Iraq.
The
state may continue to vilify them, but this will be of no account.
Power that matters has never been in the wind, the earthquake or
the fire, but in the still small voice. We learned this as children,
reading about it as if a fable. Thanks to these humble men of honor,
we have confirmation.
May
27, 2004
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final four and
a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives with
her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley, and writes a
bi-weekly column on defense issues with a libertarian perspective
for militaryweek.com.
Copyright ©
2004 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|