More Dismal than Ever
by
Ira Katz
by Ira Katz
Recently
by Ira Katz: The
Wall Street Address
Economics is
well known as the Dismal
Science. In my opinion it is more dismal than ever as the world
economy is being looted, pillaged, and run into the ground by a
group of frauds and hucksters. The intellectual cover for this heist
is being provided by people who call themselves economists but are
really propagandists. Perhaps in these times the best quantitative
measure of health for a society is the ration of true economists
to propagandists. I would estimate that it is less than 1 to a 1000
today reflecting the current dire circumstances. It is disgusting
that the likes of Krugman, Bernanke and Geithner have power, wealth
and influence, while the likes of Guido
Hülsmann, Bob
Higgs, and others associated with the Ludwig
von Mises Institute are relatively obscure.
With his wonderful
ability to laugh in the face of disaster, Bill
Bonner reports on the essentials of the situation.
06/26/09
London, England This just in…Ben Bernanke and Tim Geithner have
rushed to Los Angeles. If they can revive an entire world economy…why
not the "King of Pop?"
Fans are
hopeful…but we take a discouraging view of these revival efforts.
We admire the achievements of science and technology; as for the
works of economists and central bankers, well…we’ll wait to see
how things turn out.
Yesterday,
we took up the biggest illusion of the Bubble Era. We held it
up to the light…and noticed:
So
deeply rooted is this illusion that it will take more than a strong
wind to uproot it.
We’re talking
about the idea that government bureaucrats can do a better job
of allocating capital than free markets. Everyone seems to believe
it. They’re allowing a handful of economists – who failed the
critical test; not one of them noticed the market tsunami coming
last autumn – to direct the flow of trillions worth of savings.
They’ve already put at risk more than $12 trillion. Right now,
they’re denying the need for more "stimulus," but that
is likely to change.
Recently Lew
Rockwell gave a speech on economic
understanding. He eloquently described how people with the knowledge
of Austrian economics have a clear view of the economic scene in
spite of the turbulence of fast-changing events. Of course he is
right. Lew is the 1 in a 1000 true economist, even more so because
I imagine he does not even call himself an economist.
But there are
occasions when Lew’s insight is not comforting. As a regular reader
and occasional writer for LRC, and a longtime follower of the Austrian
school, I have been trying to prepare my own finances to withstand
the expected crisis for several years. I was out of the market before
the crash. I bought Krugerrands from Camino
Coin at $400. But it is difficult to completely prepare. I bought
a little 100-year-old duplex in 2005 for $120,000 with full knowledge
we were near the peak of the bubble. But I needed a house, so my
thinking was that at that price even under the worst circumstances
I would never lose my shirt. Another problem is that my retirement
savings are locked in dollars (primarily the TIAA annuity) for at
least 8 more years.
As it happened,
I was recruited for a job in France
just after I purchased my house. So I only lived there for a few
months and the two units have been rented on and off for three years.
Thus, I now also have substantial savings in euros. But the euro
is just another fiat currency, so I have scoured the gold shops
near the Paris bourse searching for more Krugerrands with no luck.
I recently returned to the US for the first time since the economic
collapse to visit my family and friends and to take care of personal
business (the IRS still requires a return and it gets quite complicated
with the dreaded alternative minimum tax). My trip was sobering
in that my family and friends are not properly prepared for the
hard times that I believe are in store for the US.
So the analogy
that comes to my mind regarding a follower of the Austrian school
in the bubble era is like the witness to a coming of a train wreck.
I know the train is heading for the washed out bridge at excessive
speed. In fact I have just jumped off. But my luggage is still aboard,
I have a few scrapes and bruises, and I don’t know how I will return
to civilization. Even worse, my friends and family are still on
the train.
At this point
it seems hard to believe that newly struggling masses will ever
understand the causes for their distress. While Austrian economics
is readily understandable compared to the confused, ridiculous theories
of the Keynesians, socialists and Greens of all stripes, I think
what is most likely to stick in the heads of people is good writing
that is explanatory about everyday experience. I have recently read
a couple of examples of what I have in mind.
Here is George
Eliot from her novel The
Mill on the Floss (1860) on the subject of debt. "Mrs
Tulliver carried the proud integrity of the Dodsons in her blood,
and had been brought up to think that to wrong people of their money,
which was another phrase for debt, was a sort of moral pillory;
it would have been wickedness, to her mind, to have run counter
to her husband’s desire to ‘do the right thing’, and retrieve his
name." In this case the "right thing" is to pay off
creditors. The passage continues with some sarcasm directed at the
over-consumers of her day.
These narrow
notions about debt, held by the old-fashioned Tullivers, may perhaps
excite a smile on the faces of many readers in these days of wide
commercial views and wide philosophy, according to which everything
rights itself without any trouble of ours: the fact that my tradesman
is out of pocket by me, is to be looked at through the serene
certainty that somebody else’s tradesman is in pocket by somebody
else; and since there must be bad debts in the world, why, it
is mere egoism not to like that we in particular should make them
instead of our fellow-citizens. I am telling the history of a
very simple people, who had never had any illuminating doubts
as to personal integrity and honor.
Another genre
that can be very informative about economics is travel writing.
Here is a passage from V.
S. Naipaul’s, India:
A Wounded Civilization August 1975–October 1976. The true
nature of how investment and knowledge lead to improved productivity,
and then to more wealth is apparent in this poignant description
of work in Old India.
The plateau
around Poona is now in parts like a new country, a new continent.
It provides uncluttered space, and space is what the factory-builders
and the machine-makers say they need; they say they are building
for the twenty-first century. Their confidence, in the general
doubt, is staggering. But it is so in India: the doers are always
enthusiastic. And industrial India is a world away from the India
of bureaucrats and journalists and theoreticians. The men who
make and use machines – and the Indian industrial revolution is
increasingly Indian: more and more of the machines are made in
India – glory in their new skills. Industry in India is not what
industry is said to be in other parts of the world. It has its
horrors; but, in spite of Gandhi, it does not – in the context
of India – dehumanize. An industrial job in India is more than
just a job. Men handling new machines, exercising technical skills
that to them are new, can also discover themselves as men, as
individuals.
They are
the lucky few. Not many can be rescued from the nullity of the
labour of pre-industrial India, where there are so many hands
and so few tools, where a single task can be split into minute
portions and labour can turn to absurdity. The street-sweeper
in Jaipur City uses his fingers alone to lift dust from the street
into his cart (the dust blowing away in the process, returning
to the street). The woman brushing the causeway of the great dam
in Rajasthan before the top layer of concrete is put on uses a
tiny strip of rag held between her thumb and middle finger. Veiled,
squatting, almost motionless, but present, earning her half-rupee,
her five cents, she does with her finger dabs in a day what a
child can do with a single push of a long-handled broom. She is
not expected to do more; she is hardly a person. Old India requires
few tools, few skills, and many hands.
June
29, 2009
Ira
Katz [send him mail] lives
in Paris and works as a research engineer for a French company.
He is the co-author of Handling
Mr. Hyde: Questions and Answers about Manic Depression and
Introduction
to Fluid Mechanics.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The
Best of Ira Katz
|