"Freeway
Blogging": A problematic but inventive method of political
protest.
Jonas Phillips
is the third resident of Asheville, North Carolina to be arrested
in recent weeks for displaying a pro-impeachment sign.
Unlike Mark
and Deborah Kuhn, who were targeted for official abuse because
of a display erected on their own property, Phillips was arrested
for "freeway blogging" that is, displaying a sign
on an overpass spanning the interstate near his workplace.
While different
considerations apply to protests on "public" property,
it's significant that Asheville authorities are finding it difficult
to identify a specific offense with which to charge Phillips. That
difficulty is symptomatic of institutional dishonesty: The Asheville
Police Department can't afford to admit that it arrested Phillips
because of the content of his sign, rather than because of some
danger his protest posed to the public.
Last Wednesday
(August 15), Phillips was "standing alone with my [Impeach
Bush-Cheney] sign for about 10 minutes, when I was approached by
Police Officer Russell Crisp," he
recounted. "He asked me how long I was planning to stay
there and I told him just a few more minutes because I had to go
to work at 8:00. He asked for my ID and I obliged. I asked him if
I was doing something wrong, and he said that his Sergeant was on
the way and he was going to wait for him. So, I went back to my
sign holding over the interstate."
If
Phillips had been obstructing pedestrians, or imperiling motorists,
Officer Crisp could have addressed the problem by warning the cooperative
protester to leave. He didn't issue such a warning.
A few minutes
later the Sergeant, Officer Randy Riddle, "showed up with a
paper in his hand," continues Phillips. "He spoke briefly
to Crisp, then walked over to me and told me to put down my sign,
put my hands behind my back, and that I was under arrest! I was
shocked and almost thought he was joking until he told me again
to put down the sign and put my hands behind me and I was under
arrest. So I peacefully agreed and he cuffed me. I asked him why
I was being arrested, he told me I was in violation County Ordinance
16-2 (the print out in his hand that he didn't bother to read to
me or show me). He told me I was obstructing the sidewalk. I told
him I was not and that officer Crisp had witnessed a guy walk by
me moments before."
"Riddle
yelled at me, 'You were obstructing the sidewalk!' and 'I'm sick
of this sh*t!' then he said, 'Here's your 15 minutes of fame buddy!'
I looked back to see his name plate and he said in a mean condescending
tone, 'Yea, that's "Sergeant Riddle" get it right!' He
then put me in Officer Crisp's police car. Riddle took my sign with
him and I was taken downtown and booked by Crisp. I was never read
my Miranda rights."
Two days later,
the charges
against Phillips had mutated from the relatively innocuous offense
of "obstructing the sidewalk" which would hardly
merit being handcuffed and stuffed into a police car to "endangering
motorists."
"The intent
[behind arresting Phillips] was public safety and the banner being
a hazard," insisted Asheville police Capt. Wade Wood. "Thats
basically to the benefit of the motoring public," which ran
an imperceptibly small chance of being endangered should the activist
lose control of his 5'x1' sign. It's likelier that motorists would
be killed in a bridge collapse, or perhaps in an accident involving
falling space debris. But Wood had to pull some charge out of his
emunctory aperture, and this was the best he could do.
Similar dishonest
ingenuity has been on display in Kent, Ohio, where City Law Director
James Silver announced plans to charge activist Kevin Egler with
"littering" an offense carrying a fine of up to
$500 for posting an "Impeach Bush" sign in a public
garden. The original charge, advertising in a public space, proved
useless because Egler's sign had no commercial content.
The littering
charge is obviously an instance of content-based selective prosecution:
Egler has presented dozens of photographs documenting the display
of other posters including commercial advertisements and military
recruiting pitches that were displayed without incident.
As I've
noted before, many police departments increasingly operate under
the "we'll find a reason" standard meaning that
when given an opportunity officers will contrive some excuse to
cite or arrest individuals who have committed no immediately recognizable
offense. Cases like those of Jonas Phillips, Kevin Egler, and the
Kuhns remember: three or more instances constitute a pattern
suggest that police are particularly prone to display their
creativity when dealing with certain forms of political protest.
In his valuable
new book You
Have No Rights: Stories of America in an Age of Repression,
Matthew Rothschild, editor of The Progressive, has compiled
dozens of accounts from Americans who endured harassment, arrest,
and various forms of official mistreatment after exercising their
right to protest peacefully.
In May 2004,
Joe Previtera, a student at Boston College, staged a protest of
the Abu Ghraib abuses outside a military recruiting center. He chose
to mimic the iconic photograph of a hooded detainee standing atop
a box with his arms outstretched and electrodes attached to his
body.
Previtera was
surrounded by four policemen who told him the bomb squad was on
its way. He was arrested and jailed overnight on $10,000 bond, accused
of making a "false bomb threat"; obviously, he hadn't
made a bomb threat, but because one of the heroes in blue (they're
all heroes, don't you know?) claimed to think the milk crate and
wires could be a bomb, Previtera was charged with making a false
threat. In the middle of his night in jail, Previtera was awakened
by police who tried to catechize him about the virtues of the Iraq
war: They "showed me pictures of U.S. soldiers with smiling
Iraqi children," he recalled. "The officers told me these
were pictures I'd never see in the media...."
Eventually
the charges were dropped, but the point is that Previtera, like
a growing number of others, spent time in jail for conducting a
peaceful, legal protest the local police didn't like.
Rothschild
describes how police in Miami, with $8.5 million in federal funding
tucked into an $87 billion war appropriation, waged a literal street
war against protesters during the December 2003 Free Trade of the
Americas Summit. Police eagerly used tasers, pepper spray, rubber
bullets, billyclubs, and other "non-lethal" weapons against
peaceful and largely cooperative protesters.
At one point,
riot police firing rubber bullets shot a female protester several
times in the back; during the next morning's briefing, the black-clad
champions of public order enjoyed a giddy laugh at the victim's
expense:
According to
Rothschild, Miami Police Chief John Timoney, who insisted that his
troops had acted with proper "restraint," won praise nation-wide
"for what is being called the 'Miami Model'" of protest
management.
The "Miami
Model" could be described as Tiananmen Square minus the tanks,
with non-lethal ammo ... for now:
With those
images of our heroic local police in action fresh in your mind,
please review this trailer for the 1986 ABC mini-series "Amerika,"
which portrayed the USA as a Soviet-dominated vassal state in which
public order is maintained by Soviet-controlled UN peacekeeping
troops in Imperial Stormtrooper outfits:
Adjusting for
present geopolitical circumstances and relatively minor differences
in the dominant ideology, "Amerika" in 1997 (as shown
in the program of that name) is often not that radically different
from America, 2007. Life is still relatively normal, despite the
Terrorist Event That Changed Everything (a Soviet-engineered Electromagnetic
Pulse in the television program, 9-11 for us).