'Sovereign Citizens' and Government’s Monopoly
on Crime
by
William Norman Grigg
Recently by William Norman Grigg: Foreign
Aid Is a Tool of US Imperialism
Robert
Paudert refers to May 20, 2010 – the day his son Brandon was killed
– as the "worst day of my life, ever." Given that
losing a child is the most horrible thing that can happen to a parent,
Paudert isn’t exaggerating.
Brandon Paudert
was an officer in the West Memphis, Arkansas Police Department.
At the time Brandon was killed, Robert was the town’s police chief;
Brandon’s partner, Officer Bill Evans, was his cousin.
Until about
11:00 a.m. on that fatal day, Officers Paudert and Evans, who were
assigned to the narcotics interdiction team, had maintained surveillance
on what they considered to be a "suspicious" rental truck.
It turned out that the vehicle wasn’t being used to ferry narcotics;
it was filled with household possessions belonging to a pleasant
grandmother who was probably puzzled by the unwanted attention she
had received from the local police.
Chief Paudert,
who had been called to the scene, chided his son and his nephew
and told them to "get off their butts and back on the interstate,"
where they had a better chance of finding a vehicle carrying contraband
– or perhaps a
sizeable amount of cash that could be seized and "forfeited."
Crittenden County, where West Memphis is located, has become notorious
for this officially sanctioned variety of highway robbery.
A few minutes
after hitting the highway, Evans spied a white minivan with unusual
license plates and conducted a traffic stop. He called Brandon to
back him up as he went to interrogate the driver, 45-year-old Jerry
Kane. Within a few minutes a scuffle ensued, and Kane shoved the
officer into a ditch.
Jerry Kane
was not a drug smuggler. As an adherent of a loosely organized movement
referred to as "sovereign citizens," he insisted on exercising
his freedom to travel without obtaining government licenses, permits,
and similar bureaucratic impedimenta. A former long-haul trucker,
Kane traveled the country in a minivan organizing seminars in which
he taught dubious methods of avoiding foreclosure.
Shortly before
the fatal encounter in West Memphis, Kane had been arrested – and
fined $1,500 – for driving without a license in New Mexico. His
money was dissipating even as trouble with law enforcement continued
to accumulate.
When the traffic
stop degenerated into a shoving match, Kane’s 16-year-old son, Joseph,
emerged from the minivan armed with an AK-47. Evans reached for
his sidearm, but before he could draw he was shot several times.
Taking cover behind his vehicle, Brandon got off several shots before
he, too, was fatally wounded. Roughly two hours later, the Kanes
were
killed in a shootout with police that took place in a Walmart parking
lot.
The
funeral for Brandon Paudert and Bill Evans was attended by hundreds
of police officers from several states. "I hope that no
parent has to suffer through what we’ve been through," Chief
Paudert commented a few weeks after that sorrowful observance.
There is nothing
worse than the death of a child, and every parent who has experienced
such an unfathomable loss is entitled to sympathy. It’s worth pointing
out that there is no record of Chief Paudert extending condolences
to Debra Farrow, the mother of 12-year-old DeAunta Farrow, who was
murdered by one of the officers in his employ.
DeAunta Farrow,
who was unarmed and was not a criminal suspect, was fatally shot
on June 22, 2007 by West
Memphis Police Officer Erik Sammis. The twelve-year-old was
walking home from a convenience store at about 9:30 PM with his
14-year-old cousin, Unseld Nance.
Sammis, who
was commander of the Special Response Team (the West Memphis equivalent
of a SWAT team), had staked out the neighborhood. He and Officer
Jimmy Ellis were parked in a dark gray, unmarked pickup truck. They
were wearing gray shirts, camouflage pants, and black bulletproof
vests. They did not wear badges or other police insignia visible
from the front.
As the two
boys entered an apartment building, one of the officers saw what
he thought was a gun in the waistband of Farrow’s pants. In fact
it was a plastic toy. The officers came boiling out of the truck,
ordering the kids to hit the ground. According to Nance, neither
Sammis nor Ellis identified himself as a police officer. Nance also
insisted that Farrow, whose hands were raised and whose toy gun
remained in his waistband, "was fixing to get on the ground
when they shot."
Within seconds
of screaming at DeAunta to hit the ground, Sammis fired two shots.
"It’s
a toy gun," the fatally wounded youngster told Sammis as he
bled to death.
Nance was taken
into custody and interviewed the same evening by the Arkansas State
Police. Sammis, who sought
shelter in the protection of the
"Garrity" rule – which dictates that disclosures made
by a police officer can only be used for departmental investigations,
rather than criminal prosecution – didn’t
speak for the record about the incident until a month later.
Roughly five
months after DeAunta Farrow was killed, a special prosecutor announced
that there was "insufficient evidence" to charge Sammis
with a crime. Debra Farrow filed a wrongful death lawsuit that was
immediately challenged on the grounds of "qualified immunity"
– the incantation deployed by police and prosecutors to shield themselves
from the consequences of culpable misconduct.
In
a 2009 ruling, the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, observed
that "the officers approached Farrow and Nance without identifying
themselves as police officers … the toy gun was tucked in Farrow’s
pants throughout the entire confrontation … Sammis only said to
drop the gun and get to the ground, and … Farrow may have raised
his hand or hands while trying to get to the ground before Sammis
shot him twice without warning."
Since those
facts "could establish the excessive use of force," the
court concluded, it would be improper to grant the officers’ request
for a summary judgment on the basis of "qualified immunity."
In
April 2011, a federal jury in Jonesboro, Arkansas found in favor
of Sammis and Ellis, accepting their claim that the summary
execution of an unarmed, cooperative 12-year-old who was not a criminal
suspect was, in some sense, "reasonable."
Sammis, it
should be pointed out, was responsible for training other members
of the West Memphis PD in the use of deadly force. Chief
Paudert described his work in that role as "outstanding."
"It’s
tragic, but in my mind, it’s not wrong," Sammis had told investigators
during his belated debriefing in July 2007. "I did what I had
to do to survive and protect my partner. I feel confident that any
officer in the same position would have done the same thing I did."
Here’s an important
question: If Sammis was justified in gunning down a terrified, unarmed,
compliant 12-year-old, why was it morally wrong for Joseph
Kane to shoot an armed police officer who was perceived as threatening
his father?
It might be
said that the late Jerry Kane was a con artist, and that his previous
run-ins with various law enforcement agencies suggested criminal
tendencies. Whatever could be said about the merits of Kane’s seminars,
there is no evidence that he was a thief. Driving without government-assigned
"privileges" may be unwise – as Kane’s experiences demonstrate
– but this can’t be described as a "crime" in any rational
sense of the word.
Sammis, by
way of contrast, had a lengthy history of violent misconduct, including
behavior that can honestly be described as criminal.
Before finding
employment in West Memphis, Sammis was a "gypsy cop" with
a predictably troubled record. He had been reprimanded – and then
fired – by the North Little Rock PD for making "untruthful
statements." After a short stint in Gould, Sammis was hired
by the West Memphis PD. His background investigation noted that
Sammis, who was notoriously untruthful and had problems with his
temper, would need careful "supervision."
In 1998, Sammis
unleashed an attack dog on a non-violent suspect. Witnesses described
the attack as sadistic and unprovoked. The victim required 75 stitches,
and the city government discontinued use of K-9 "officers"
because of the episode. A year later, Sammis was suspended for a
day without pay after insisting on wearing his "battle dress
uniform" rather than a conventional patrol uniform. A few months
later he was investigated for "abuse of authority" following
a "confrontation" with security guards at a Pilot Truck
Stop.
At the time
of the shooting, Sammis was facing at least two lawsuits for abusive
conduct, one of them growing out of an incident in which he was
part of a police wolf-pack that beat and handcuffed a man named
Tim Howard. After Howard was restrained, Sammis – according
to witnesses – grabbed Howard by the hair and unloaded a canister
of pepper spray directly into his face. When Howard’s mother pleaded
with Sammis to stop, the officer slugged the 48-year-old woman in
the face, and then assaulted Howard’s father as well. Eventually
the lawsuit was settled out of court.
Sammis resigned
from the West Memphis PD in December 2007, weeks after the special
prosecutor had announced that no charges would be filed against
him.
"The FBI/DOJ
investigation, the Arkansas State Police investigation, the independent
prosecutor investigation, and the WMPD internal investigation have
all cleared me in this tragic event," Sammis
wrote in his resignation letter. "I am leaving this department
knowing that I did the right thing."
The "right
thing," according to the officials who reviewed the incident,
was to shoot and kill an unarmed 12-year-old boy who was not a criminal
suspect and posed no threat to anybody.
As a representative
of the State’s coercive caste, Sammis had an unqualified right to
kill DeAunta Farrow, and the child had an unambiguous duty to die.
The child’s killer is not required to express remorse. The grieving
mother isn’t even entitled to official sympathy from the Police
Chief who hired that killer, insulated him from accountability,
praised his performance, promoted him, and extolled him as a role
model to others on the force.
The only substantive
"reform" to occur because of the killing of DeAunta Farrow
was a
municipal ordinance banning the possession of toy guns.
Owing to the
fact that DeAunta Farrow was black, and Sammis is white, the child’s
shooting was exploited by Al Sharpton and similar figures in the
Indignation Industry’s race-baiting affiliate. One "civil rights"
group was conspicuous by its absence: The so-called Southern Poverty
Law Center (SPLC), the lucrative quasi-private secret police agency
founded by the degenerate fraud named Morris Dees.
The DeAunta
Farrow case – the murder, by an abusive white cop, of a poor black
child – would appear to be perfectly tailored for a "civil
rights" group focusing on issues of poverty and racial injustice.
This is especially true in light of the fact that in the years prior
to DeAunta’s murder, the West Memphis PD had been hit with a half-dozen
lawsuits alleging civil rights violations, and had lost five of
them.
Obviously,
West Memphis was a target-rich environment for the SPLC. Yet the
group didn’t pay any attention to the town until
after Officers Paudert and Evans were killed in an encounter with
"sovereign citizens" – that is, political dissidents
of a kind who figure
prominently in the SPLC-defined official demonology.
In December
2007, the
West Memphis City Council passed a resolution calling on Bob Paudert
to resign, along with Officers Sammis and Ellis.
"Why should
I resign?" responded Chief Paudert. "I haven’t done anything
wrong."
When Paudert
finally resigned in 2011, he treated it as a personal triumph that
he hadn’t been "run out of town" by his critics – including,
one assumes, the mother of DeAunta Farrow. He was immediately hired
by the Bureau
of Justice Assistance, a division of the
same "Justice" Department that found
no "civil rights violation" in Erik Sammis’s killing of
DeAunta Farrow. He has become an SPLC-promoted evangelist, touring
the country to "make sure others who wear the badge don’t
get murdered by a group of domestic terrorists," in the words
of a news account.
"We as
law enforcement officers must recognize this very real threat, so
we can protect ourselves," Paudert
said in an SPLC propaganda video. He insists that "sovereign
citizens" should
be regarded as a pervasive threat to officer safety. This refrain
is joined by the SPLC and the FBI, who – by way of demonstrating
the "deadly threat" posed by the estimated 300,000 members
of the "sovereign citizens" – point out that eight
police officers have died in encounters with people regarded as
"sovereign citizens" since 2000.
Although police
agencies diligently record the death of every officer, there is
no comparable tally of "the precise number of people killed
by the police, and the number of times police use excessive force,"
noted
Fox Butterfield of the New York Times about a decade ago.
An abortive effort was made in the mid-1980s to collect and publish
that data, but was quickly discontinued because "the figures
were very embarrassing to a lot of police departments," observed
James Fyfe, a professor of criminal justice at Temple University.
The SPLC describes
"sovereign citizens" as people who believe that they alone
"get to decide which laws to obey and which to ignore."
Some people thrown into that category have circulated worthless
financial instruments; others conduct business in a "peculiar
dialect" that is deliberately opaque and understood only by
a small, self-selected population.
If that description
were considered accurate, it would be difficult to distinguish the
behavior of "sovereign citizens" from that of the exalted
personages who call themselves the "government." Such
people take refuge in arcane language to justify law-breaking, including
the routine practice of monumental financial fraud involving the
public treasury.
The SPLC accuses
"sovereign citizens" of emitting "verbal fog"
as a way to distract attention from their schemes. One wonders if
anybody with that organization has ever been exposed to the artful
gibberish that dribbles down the chin of Federal Reserve Chairman
Ben Bernanke every time he makes a public effort to justify the
activities of his criminal cartel.
The SPLC depicts
"sovereigns" as lawless people who are primed to kill
and utterly remorseless in dealing with those they regard as enemies.
If this is the case they’re guilty of mimicking the government they
despise.
Disinterested
application of the SPLC’s definition would lead us to conclude that
Barack Obama is the most dangerous "sovereign citizen"
on the planet, given his assertion of the power to imprison or kill
anybody on the face of the earth. The SPLC’s zeal for the sanctity
of the law, and its compassion for "people of color,"
didn’t inspire the organization to protest the murder of 16-year-old
Yemeni-American Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, who was killed, on presidential
orders, in a CIA drone strike.
Decades ago,
the immortal Albert Jay Nock pointed out that a public functionary
who calls himself an "official" will routinely acts that
any objective, moral observer would describe as crimes. Such a person
can do such things "without any sense of responsibility, or
discomfort, simply because [he acts] as an official and not as a
man." In this fashion, "once could commit almost any kind
of crime without getting in trouble with one’s conscience"
– or with the public, once it has been properly indoctrinated regarding
the mystical
concept called "authority."
"Sovereign
citizens" supposedly believe that acts of force and fraud are
transmuted into justice when accompanied with the proper conjurations.
How would that differ, in principle, from the behavior of the governing
"officials" on whose behalf the SPLC labors? If "officials"
can commit acts of aggressive violence, on what moral basis do we
condemn similar behavior on the part of private individuals who
declare themselves "Sovereign" as well?
When a "Sovereign"
kills a police officer, the SPLC – speaking on behalf of the entire
police state apparatus – commands us to mourn and rend our garments.
When Officer Erik Sammis guns down a 12-year-old African-American,
or Barack Obama slaughters an Yemeni-American teenager with a drone-fired
missile, the SPLC maintains a reverent silence in the face of what
it must regard as the sacramental exercise of the government’s transcendent
authority – while it quietly adds names to its ever-expanding roster
of dissidents
and heretics.
September
22, 2012
William
Norman Grigg [send him mail]
publishes the Pro
Libertate blog and hosts the Pro
Libertate radio program.
Copyright
© 2012 William Norman Grigg
The
Best of William Norman Grigg
|