What
Does Taking Fallujah Get Us?
by
James Glaser
by James Glaser
It
was reported on Sunday that the Marines have taken Fallujah. Now
this isn’t like when the Marines took Iwo Jima or Guadalcanal, but
Washington wants us to think that. The truth is that this battle
did almost nothing to shorten our troops’ stay in Iraq.
The
Department of Defense reports that 38 U.S. troops were killed and
275 wounded in the ongoing operation in Fallujah. 60 of the wounded
could return to duty. Without our incredible medical care, we might
have lost a couple of hundred troops; as it is over 300 casualties
in less than a week is bad enough.
Remember,
this is just our losses in Fallujah. According to Defense Department
reports, another 17 soldiers were killed in the rest of Iraq. Depending
on which report you read, we lost either three or four helicopters,
several tanks and who knows how many other vehicles.
Now
I was in the Marine Corps and it really tears me up to see these
losses, but what is even harder to cope with, is that these deaths
and wounds were for almost nothing. Washington kept telling the
country and the enemy that we were going to attack for weeks. Therefore,
any of the top enemy commanders who wanted to, could walk away from
Fallujah long before any fighting started.
We
claim we killed anywhere from 600 to a 1,000 of the enemy fighters,
but there has been no count on the number of innocent civilians
we killed. Just like in Vietnam, you see a leg lying there and you
just know that leg belonged to an enemy soldier. No way could that
leg have belonged to an old man or woman or some teenager in the
wrong spot at the wrong time.
You
drop a 500-pound bomb or a 155 artillery round on a house, you're
lucky if you can identify a leg. Sure we killed a lot of the enemy,
but to put a number on them and no number on the civilians killed
tells us a lot. We haven’t a clue as to whose body parts we were
counting and we really don’t want to know. Civilian deaths are hard
on troop morale.
Will
taking Fallujah get our troops home faster? Only the ones coming
home in a box or shipped to some state-side hospital. How about
enemy troop strength, did we cut that down? Iraq has a custom of
"blood feuds" and by destroying a huge city like Fallujah
(Pop. 300,000+), we very well might have increased the number of
fighters against us.
Before
this war, all we talked about was how Saddam destroyed whole towns
and villages of those who opposed him and now we are using that
same tactic.
The
world sees a lot more of the fighting going on in Iraq this past
week than we see here in the States. All of our coverage is approved
by the military and we only see what they want us to see. The world
on the other hand sees only what we don’t want our own citizens
to see. If there is a dead child, you know the rest of the world
is going to see that little body over and over again.
We
are in a War on Terrorism and the rest of the world watches in horror
as American troops bomb, fire artillery, use tanks and attack helicopters
and jets against a city whose claim to fame is that it has over
two hundred houses of worship.
We
are losing this War in Iraq and I believe, even though we took that
city and killed several hundred Iraqi fighters, we have lost this
battle. There is no way that we could win, when we displace hundreds
of thousands of innocent people, kill who knows how many innocent
civilians who couldn’t leave for one reason or another, and destroy
much of a huge metropolitan area.
The
whole world sees what were are doing and they have to ask is the
price the innocent people had to pay worth it so that the United
States could kill maybe less than a thousand Iraqi freedom fighters?
How many of those Iraqis died defending their own homes? Wouldn’t
most Americans do the same and fight, if a foreign power was destroying
their home town?
November
16, 2004
Jim
Glaser [send him mail],
a Marine Corps Vietnam War veteran and Commander of VFW Post 3869,
works to educate the American public on the consequences of war.
His personal website is James-Glaser.com.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
James
Glaser Archives
|