Polar
Bears Endangered – by Greenie Bureaucrats
by
Humberto Fontova
by Humberto Fontova
DIGG THIS
There's roughly
twice as many polar bears in the world today as thirty years ago.
But on May 14th U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, invoking
the US Endangered Species Act, proclaimed polar bears as a "threatened
species." In 1972 the creatures had already lost value in the
US when the Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibited their hunting
in Alaska. (And no, it's not the hunting ban that caused their increased
numbers; they proliferated equally in Canada which continued the
polar bear season.)
After 1972
US hunters started hunting polar bears in Canada. But Kempthorne's
recent proclamation means that US hunters will be barred by law
from bringing their trophy bear skins into the US, so again Polar
Bears have lost value. Lately hunters (primarily from the US) have
been paying $30,000 for the chance of whacking a polar bear during
a grueling hunt in the Canadian arctic on dogsleds and in subzero
weather. If successful, then the hunter's taxidermist landed another
$5,000 or so for converting the beast's epidermis into an infuriatingly
politically-incorrect rug for the hunter to display to his politically-correct
guests at dinner parties. Generally speaking, the most spirited
reactions from guests came after uncorking the eighth bottle of
wine.
Most of these
guests were usually his wife's friends from the local Art Council
and Kayak Club and spittle sometimes landed on his valuable rug
of thick white fur, but without lasting damage. The often lipstick-smeared
sprayings quickly evaporated and whatever effort was involved in
wiping them up was well worth the spectacle of pulsating veins on
pretty crimson-hued foreheads with earrings jangling below from
the bobbing motions, along with the slender, perfumed (but always
white-knuckled) fists constantly thrust to within millimeters of
his nose.
"Ah, but
they look so sexy that way!" the hunter would always remark
to his glowering wife as she frantically motioned the guests into
another room. "Like a woman in a Tango!" the smirking
hunter persisted. "In the words of legendary poet, Jorge Luis
Borges: 'The tango shows that a fight may be a celebration!'"
Alas, the hunter's
philosophical reflections were always lost on his guests – not to
mention his wife.
At any rate,
most of the $30,000 spent by the hunter for his foolproof conversation
piece went to Canada's Inuit (Eskimo) communities whose members
had served as his guide, cooks, outfitters, etc., during the hunt.
The Eskimos also got the polar bear meat, which has been a historic
staple in their diet.
"It's Inuit
food," says Canadian Inuit Jayko Alooloo in an interview with
Canada's CTV, "like cows for you southern people.''
Alooloo also
regards the newly-designated status of polar bears as "endangered"
as a complete crock.
"They're
actually increasing every year," he says. But what does he
know? He only lives amongst them? Whereas, from his Washington D.C.
Office, U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne relied on computer
weather model to predict that in 50 years, due to Global Warming's
effect on arctic ice fields, polar bears will decrease in numbers.
My own weatherman's computer model's rarely get it right for the
next four days. Kempthorne's nails it for the next fifty years!
Recreational
hunters (again, overwhelmingly from the US) pumped $3 million a
year into Eskimo communities for polar bear hunts. These Inuit communities
get a quota of bear tags (licenses) from the Canadian government
to use as they see fit. They can hunt the bears themselves for the
meat, and for the roughly $1000 per hide if they sell it. Or they
can sell the tag to a recreational hunter for $30,000 – serve as
his guide, (i.e. experience most of their culture's traditional
and integral parts of the hunt) and still keep the meat. Only a
Federal bureaucrat would miss the implications here.
In fact, these
hunts being such an integral part of their culture, a few Inuits
elect to retain the tags for themselves to do the killing. The new
ruling means that now they'll probably keep all. A recreational
hunt lasts a few days and – like all hunting – does not always climax
with kill. But the tag is considered used once it's sold to a recreational
hunter, kill or no kill. On the other hand, Inuit hunters always
kill a bear because they have months to fill that tag. So now that
US Recreational hunters are barred by US Federal law from bringing
home their conversation-piece rug, the Inuits have no choice but
to keep their tags, assuring that more polar bears will be killed.
May
31, 2008
Humberto
Fontova [send him mail]
is the author of Exposing
the Real Che Guevara and the Useful Idiots Who Idolize Him.
Visit his website.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Humberto
Fontova Archives
|