Pol
Tax
by
Becky Akers
by Becky Akers
Mayors across
the country increasingly see smokers as God's gift to spendthrift
governments. They steal from them accordingly. This is especially
true of New York's Michael Bloomberg, whose ambitions along these
lines match his outsized city. Let other places diddle around with
ten-cent
tobacco taxes, as does Hueytown, Alabama, or even a buck (Washington,
DC); New York is bigger than that. Mike
wants to boost its already-staggering tax on cigarettes by a whopping
50 cents. This will push the price of a pack past $8, with Leviathan
grabbing $3.50 of that. New Yorkers will then suffer the dubious
distinction of paying the highest tobacco tax nationwide: even Chicago
steals only $3.05 per pack.
Mike shrugged
off suggestions that he's picking smokers' pockets a tad aggressively.
"Its not a revenue source," he announced, and he's right about
that. It's a revenue geyser. "We're trying to save the lives of
our children."
I won't pretend
to understand how bankrupting their parents saves children's lives,
but perhaps Mike's onto something here. Can taxing smokers and other
dangerous folks really save lives? If so, let's tax politicians.
Smokers and
politicians have more in common than you might think. Both blow
smoke. Both stink the place up. Both stand around in the cold and
solicit strangers, one for a light, the other for votes. Both are
addicted, though smokers kick their filthy habit a heck of a lot
more easily and often than politicians do.
Think how many
lives would be saved had we taxed politicians all along. No more
Americans dying of boredom during endless political campaigns and
debates. Outraged citizens would never again suffer heart attacks
over the latest Congressional scandal. And without politicians'
pork larding the budget, government spending should shrink so we're
less likely to keel over from shock after figuring our taxes every
April.
But the number
of lives saved here is modest compared to those spared by our tax's
effect on war. I predict this scourge will disappear once politicians
are too busy coughing up their tax bills to shove troops at the
world's hot spots. With the biggest killer of all time eliminated,
life expectancy should zoom.
There are other,
less obvious ways that taxing politicians back into the holes they
popped out of will save lives. For starters, it should scare the
daylights out of their appointees at bureaucracies large and small.
Those at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may well be so terrified
we'll tax them, too, that they'll release the cures for cancer they're
delaying or at least the remedies for obesity and crow's feet.
Perhaps the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) will
become too nervous to demonize and regulate alcohol. Red wine could
finally prevent as much heart disease here as it does in France.
With any luck,
we'll observe the same chastening effect at the other alphabet agencies,
including those that may not directly take lives but try their hardest
to ruin them. Name your poison the IRS, FEMA, the TSA, the DEA
and imagine the furor as their employees dive for cover.
Given stakes
this high, we want our tax to succeed, so let's take some pointers
from Mike the Knife. First, the rate should be exorbitant enough
that folks think we're joking. But of course we're not: lives hang
in the balance. So don't be shy. Pull a number out of the air and
double it. Now triple it. We want politicians to gasp as loudly
as smokers have.
Secondly, notice
that Mike foists his preposterous tax on an unpopular minority.
The minority we're targeting is even more loathed than smokers.
Also in our favor is that politicians tend to be millionaires, while
smokers cluster at the lower end of the economy. If Mike can justify
picking on the poor for their own good, how much more can we justify
taxing politicians for ours?
The IRS's sliding
scale has snagged trillions of our taxes over the years; I bet it'll
work for us, too. We'll tax city councillors at 100% of their paychecks;
mayors at 200%; State Assemblymen, 300%; US Congressmen and Senators,
400 and 450%, respectively, and Presidents at 1000% 2000% if they
ask, "What Constitution?"
What will we
do with all this loot? The sky's the limit, but we might consider
funding preliminary R&D on a PAC patch or governing gum. If
those wean politicians from their cravings as well as nicotine patches
and gums wean smokers from theirs, we'll research a vacillation
vaccine next.
Some might
call my tax a pipe dream. But with a bit of tinkering, it should
work. So sit back, relax, and get ready to enjoy a politician-free
paradise!
March
8, 2006
Becky
Akers [send her mail]
writes primarily about the American Revolution.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Becky
Akers Archives
|