The Awful Strife of Nature
by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
DIGG THIS
Environmentalism,
it’s been said, is the ideological luxury of city dwellers in modern
life, for anyone who lives just outside an urban or suburban environment
knows the truth: nature is vicious and cruel and works relentlessly
to make the life of man a living Hell.
I was reminded
of this when looking at the horrible, bloody gashes on my brother’s
domesticated cat, a sweet animal that lives in harmony with his
superiors, the human family that owns and cares for him. The violence
had been inflicted by another cat, a wild animal that is much bigger
and lacks the mirage of conscience that we try to infuse in our
pets.
The wild animal
arrives at the back porch of this house nestled in the country on
the edge of the West Texas desert. When no one is looking, the wild
animal terrorizes the domestic cat, stealing food, slashing at his
fur and skin, and generally try to rid the world of its competition
for survival.
One would think
it would be easy enough to kill it, but it is cunning beyond all
expectation. I wandered through the mesquite and wild grass looking
for him, rifle in hand, but he knew where I was going and hid magnificently.
Once I gave up he would appear again as if to taunt me. I would
go out with the gun again, and it would start all over.
As my brother
and I waited in silence by the reservoir, I noted a skull sitting
by the water. Where did this come from? Wild dogs, came the answer.
They have been prowling for three months. They target the goats.
Three months ago, there were 16 goats, domesticated and happy. Then
one day the dogs arrived. At night, they hop the fence, and kill
them and drag them away. Sometimes they ravaged them to the bone
right on the spot, and leave the remains to bake in the sun.
Man’s best
friend!
The goat herd
was down to three. One missing goat made everyone particularly sad.
It was undersized, born early, white with brown spots. It was brought
close to the house and reared in safety. After several months, it
was big enough to care for itself and it was allowed to roam with
the others. It only took a day, however. It was the first one targeted
in the season’s opening massacre. The baby goat was dinner for dogs.
Such problems
as this dominate country life. When it’s not dogs and coyotes and
wild cats, it’s other varmints such as raccoons and hyenas, not
to mention snakes and scorpions. Flesh-eating birds devour the fish
in the pond. Turtles compete for food. Then there is the plant life
itself, which is far from innocent to the well being of people.
Poison plants and thorny bushes dare us to walk outside areas we
have tilled. They choked out new plantings. Then there is the weather
itself, which seems to be constantly conspiring to make our lives
miserable and foil our plans.
Generally the
picture you gain from living in this environment for more than a
few days is the very opposite of the "preservationist"
outlook you get from environmental propaganda. If we are to survive
in this cruel world, the only option is to tame it or kill it. It’s
them or us. We hear about the precious and delicate balance of nature,
how species help each to thrive in a mystical cycle of being, but
all we witness is a "natural" kill-or-be-killed practice
that is so awful you can hardly watch.
The cruel competition
for survival is not limited to animals. It extends to plants, to
all things. And it could easily characterize the actions of people
absent the civilizing institution of exchange, ownership, and the
marketplace – the scene of peace in which man uses his reason to
create and develop, cooperate and flourish.
And what is
war but the very opposite of this impulse, a reversal of reason
and an attempt at practicing authentic "environmentalism"
in which the choice is to kill or be killed?
As I thought
of the lessons here, going through my head were the words of a speech
delivered by Absalom Weaver in Garet Garrett’s novel Satan’s
Bushel, a book of agricultural life with a speech by Weaver
that has profound economic and political significance. For in this
speech, he compares what is the same and what is different between
man and nature. In so doing, he draws attention to aspects of nature
that are completely forgotten amid the propaganda.
The setting
is a gathering of farmers, who are being lectured by a government
bureaucrat at the turn of the 20th century. They are
being told to join the federal effort to coordinate wheat sales
among themselves, as a means of driving up prices. The problem,
as they see it, is that farmers were fighting for their livelihoods
in an age of rising industrialization. How can they survive? The
bureaucrat offered one way. Weaver offered another:
"This natural
elm," he began, with an admiring look at the tree, "was once a tiny
thing. A sheep might have eaten it at one bite. Every living thing
around it was hostile and injurious. And it survived. It grew. It
took its profit. It became tall and powerful beyond the reach of
enemies. What preserved it – cooperative marketing? What gave it
power – a law from Congress? What gave it fullness – the Golden
Rule? On what was its strength founded – a fraternal spirit? You
know better. Your instincts tell you no. It saved itself. It found
its own greatness. How? By fighting.
"Did you
know that plants fight? If only you could see the deadly, ceaseless
warfare among plants this lovely landscape would terrify you. It
would make you think man's struggles tame. I will show you some
glimpses of it.
"I hold up
this leaf from the elm. The reason it is flat and thin is that the
peaceable work of its life is to gather nourishment for the tree
from the air. Therefore it must have as much surface as possible
to touch the air with. But it has another work to do. A grisly work.
A natural work all the same. It must fight.
"For that
use it is pointed at the end as you see and has teeth around the
edge – these. The first thing the elm plant does is to grow straight
up out of the ground with a spear thrust, its leaves rolled tightly
together. Its enemies do not notice it. Then suddenly each leaf
spreads itself out and with its teeth attacks other plants; it overturns
them, holds them out of the sunlight, drowns them. And this is the
tree! Do you wonder why the elm plant does not overrun the earth?
Because other plants fight back, each in its own way.
"I show
you a blade of grass. It has no teeth. How can it fight? Perhaps
it lives by love and sweetness. It does not. It grows very fast
by stealth, taking up so little room that nothing else minds, until
all at once it is tall and strong enough to throw out blades in
every direction and fall upon other plants. It smothers them to
death. Then the bramble. I care not for the bramble. Not because
it fights. For another reason. Here is its weapon. Besides the spear
point and the teeth the bramble leaf you see is in five parts,
like one's hand. It is a hand in fact, and one very hard to cast
off. When it cannot overthrow and kill an enemy as the elm does,
it climbs up his back to light and air, and in fact prefers that
opportunity, gaining its profit not in natural combat but in shrewd
advantage, like the middleman.
"Another
plant I would like to show you. There is one near by. Unfortunately
it would be inconvenient to exhibit him in these circumstances.
His familiar name is honeysuckle. He is sleek, suave, brilliantly
arrayed, and you would not suspect his nature, which is that of
the preying speculator. Once you are in his toils it is hopeless.
If you have not drowned or smothered him at first he will get you.
The way of this plant is to twist itself round and round another
and strangle it.
"This awful
strife is universal in plant life. There are no exemptions. Among
animals it is not so fierce. They can run from one another. Plants
must fight it out where they stand. They must live or die on the
spot. Among plants of one kind there is rivalry. The weak fall out
and die; the better survive. That is the principle of natural selection.
But all plants of one kind fight alike against plants of all other
kinds. That is the law of their strength. None is helped but who
first helps himself. A race of plants that had wasted its time waiting
for Congress to give it light and air, or for a state bureau with
hired agents to organize it by the Golden Rule, or had been persuaded
that its interests were in common with those of the consumer, would
have disappeared from the earth."
Garrett
provides this speech as a warning to producers tied to the land:
they must be fighters or die. The warning to all of us is that we
must understand that nature is only provisionally tamed. In truth,
we live in the wild, and we are only a step away from being devoured
by it.
November
23, 2007
Jeffrey
Tucker [send him mail]
is editorial vice president of www.Mises.org.
Comment on
the Mises blog.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Jeffrey
Tucker Archives
|