American
Idols
by
Michael Tennant
by Michael Tennant
DIGG THIS
The Ten Commandments
begin thus: "I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of
Egypt, out of the land of slavery. You shall have no other gods
before me. You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of
anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters
below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them . . ."
(Exodus 20:2–5a).
How I wish
that Christians who are outraged over the removal of a monument
of the Ten Commandments from a courthouse would instead concern
themselves with their own fealty to the commandments! If they did,
these same conservative Christians would realize that they do indeed
worship another god – one that they put on an equal footing with,
if not above, the God of the Bible. That god, of course, is the
United States government; and the
idol of many of these Christians is George
W. Bush.
How else can
one explain the willingness – even eagerness – of so many Christians
to accept the mass murder of their fellow human beings by their
own government while harshly criticizing foreign governments or
terrorist organizations for doing, or even contemplating, the same
thing on a much smaller scale?
For example,
Joseph Farah, a professed Christian, recently endorsed Congressman
Tom Tancredo’s suggestion that terrorist
attacks on the U.S. by al-Qaeda be met with nuclear attacks on Muslim
cities from Mecca to Damascus, thus consigning millions to certain
death as a result of the actions of a few who may or may not even
reside in the cities which Farah wishes to bomb. Farah rightly condemns
the murder of innocent civilians by Muslim terrorists but then turns
right around and proposes that the U.S. government murder many times
more innocent civilians in retaliation for terrorist attacks. If
Farah is willing to allow his own government to play God with the
lives of people in other countries, then he must consider that government
to be the equal of God. Talk about bowing down to idols!
The Catholic
Sean Hannity, for his part, has expressed dismay that Michael Vick
might serve only a year in prison for torturing dogs yet continues
wholeheartedly to stand behind the U.S. government’s policy of torturing
human beings. One suspects that Hannity would not condone the torture
of dogs even if the government repealed the laws under which Vick
is being prosecuted or, worse, actually encouraged or paid Vick
to torture dogs. Somehow, though, when the government says that
torturing certain human beings is permissible and possibly even
a patriotic duty, Hannity suddenly drops all his objections to the
practice and excoriates those who continue to object.
The Bible clearly
holds governments to the same standards as it does individuals (see
the story of David and Bathsheba in II Samuel 11 and 12), but the
alleged Christian Hannity does not. The only explanation is that
Hannity considers the U.S. government the equal of God, possessing
the authority to make its own rules of conduct. (Needless to say,
Hannity is also in favor of our government’s continued occupation
of Iraq and its impending military actions against Iran.)
The agenda-driven
pundits are, unfortunately, not the only ones who have conflated
Uncle Sam and Father God. I recently received an email from an acquaintance
which requested that I say the following prayer: "Lord, hold
our troops in your loving hands. Protect them as they protect us.
Bless them and their families for the selfless acts they perform
for us in our time of need. Amen." It’s misguided and sickening.
The troops are not protecting us from anything; they are invading
and occupying foreign countries that have done us no harm. We are
in far more danger from the regime in Washington, D.C., which controls
the troops and could easily use them against us, than we are from
the regimes in Tehran, Damascus, or Pyongyang. Why should God bless
invaders who have brought death and destruction to millions of innocent
people?
Even
worse than the prayer were the accompanying images. Take this one
(right), for example.
The clear implication
is that God is the power behind the U.S. military, which is doing
his work throughout the world – you know, bombing, killing, maiming,
and all those other wonderful things that the God who is described
as the embodiment of love (I John 4:8) would be doing if he weren’t
so busy doing bleeding-heart liberal things like showing mercy and
forgiveness.
Furthermore,
the Ephesians passage is blatantly misapplied to a flesh-and-blood
struggle for power in the physical world. The passage is, in fact,
part of the Apostle Paul’s description of the "full armor of
God" (Ephesians 6:11), which he clearly states is not for use
"against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the
authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the
spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms" (Ephesians
6:12). Turning that passage into an endorsement of the U.S. military’s
imperial adventures is to make a liar of Paul and, by extension,
God.
Even
more egregious than that picture, however, is this one (left).
Here we have
the cross, the very symbol of love, redemption, and forgiveness
through Jesus Christ, juxtaposed with the flag, the symbol of the
U.S. government and its world-girdling empire built on violence
and bloodshed. Without doubt, the irony of the association of an
implement of state-sanctioned torture and execution with Old Glory
is lost on the person who came up with this piece of blasphemy.
The federal government, like all governments, subsists on theft
and retains and expands its power through force and the threat of
force. Jesus, on other hand, forces himself on no one and, as
Joseph Sobran recently noted, rejected the kind of power we
now invest in our presidents and, I add, which so many Christians
worship as long as it is in the hands of George W. Bush.
Further
proof of the complete lack of a sense of irony on the part of these
worshipers of Uncle Sam’s "benevolent global hegemony"
comes in the form of this last image from the email (right).
A boy attends
the funeral of his father, a U.S. Marine, and struggles to hold
back the tears. Now if that doesn’t make you reconsider the whole
imperial project, which is directly responsible for thousands of
such scenes across America, then you either have a heart of stone
or are so blinded by state worship that you consider the death of
a father and resulting instability in his family a sacrifice worth
making to your god. If the latter is the case, you’re in good company:
Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright considered the deaths
of half a million Iraqi children as a result of U.S. bombings and
sanctions to be a
worthy sacrifice to Moloch,
too.
So, dear Christian
brother or sister, which is it? Do you genuinely try to obey the
Ten Commandments; or are you merely concerned that they be displayed
somewhere, preferably on government property where, perhaps, they
will add a sense of legitimacy to the state? Does God make rules
that apply to both individuals and governments, or are governments
free to write their own rules if doing so makes you feel safer?
Is it the crime of the century for Osama bin Laden to engineer the
deaths of 3,000 Americans but a boon to humanity for George W. Bush
to take actions that have resulted in the deaths of another 3,000
Americans (and counting) and untold thousands of Iraqis and Afghans?
Be careful
how you answer those questions. You may find that you do have another
god, the U.S. government, before the one you claim to worship "with
all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind"
(Matthew 22:37).
August
30, 2007
Michael
Tennant [send
him mail] is a software developer in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Michael
Tennant Archives
|