Award-Winning
Edu-Speak
by
Linda
Schrock Taylor
by Linda Schrock Taylor
It
is actually a relief that I will never be named, 'Teacher of the
Year,' to represent any public school district. I am positive that
my perspective on education differs greatly from that of mainstream
educators and administrators, and I would be unwilling to make the
kind of speeches that such a role would require.
There
is an additional problem, as well; I neither speak, nor fully understand,
the new PC education language. Normally I am very adept at communication.
I understand the speech of nearly every deaf and hard of hearing
person I have ever met. I study linguistics and the roots of language.
I studied French for seven years in school. During my year spent
with Chilean and Venezuelan friends at Manchester University, I
came to understand Spanish well enough to follow conversations.
I correct my son's Latin translations with rather good accuracy.
But despite my frequent exposure to Edu-Speak, I never become accustomed
to it.
Recently
I was researching the field of educational speakers, when I read
this quote on a brochure,
"I
believe the children and teachers I serve are strong, capable,
and rich in knowledge. All humans are curious and interested in
constructive learning and understanding. Learners are very capable
of generating curriculum within parameters set by national, state,
and local standards. Learners deserve the opportunity to work
in collaboration with others to socially construct knowledge."
I
have been pondering this supposedly meaningful utterance but doubt
that I have completely and accurately interpreted the message. This
fact especially concerns me for I note that the speaker teaches
at the elementary level, and I am wondering how her young charges
could possibly begin to make sense of instruction patterned after
such trends in speech and thought.
"I
believe the children and teachers I serve are strong, capable, and
rich in knowledge." Odd…I think of myself as a teacher and
a co-worker, rather than as a servant. I fear that someone
too eager to play the servant role might do too much for those capable
of doing much more for themselves. I don't believe in spoon-feeding
students. I can believe that many teachers are 'rich with knowledge'
but if the students were already so knowledgeable, one would think
they might be in an accelerated program or charter school.
"All
humans are curious and interested in constructive learning and understanding."
Well, I, for one, know several students, as well as many adults,
who certainly do not fit this description. I wonder if this isn't
more 'wishful thinking' than accurate description.
"Learners
are very capable of generating curriculum within parameters set
by national, state and local standards." For a fleeting
moment, I hoped this meant that students could undertake the job
of writing curriculum that will meet the Michigan standards and
benchmarks, thereby saving our committees a great deal of work.
However, I simply cannot believe that students are capable of generating
complex curriculum when experienced teachers find that trying to
meet the varying parameters of the national, state and local standards,
is a near-impossible task.
"Learners
deserve the opportunity to work in collaboration with others to
socially construct knowledge." …. Oh, dear. I can understand
why parents avoid the schools, rather than feel foolish when challenged
to interpret a statement such as this. To "construct knowledge?"
I have spent a small fortune to build a family library containing
thousands of volumes because I want my son surrounded by the wisdom
of the ages; the discoveries of science; the geography of the Earth;
the wonders of living things; the Truths of life. In my lifetime
busy with study, I have only learned a miniscule portion of the
knowledge available to us. I certainly have no intention of wasting
my son's precious learning years by foolishly encouraging him to
'construct knowledge' out of the thin air of his limited, and very
youthful, experiences.
Reading
this teacher's 'weighty' statements brought to mind a game that
is again making the e-mail rounds. With but a few changes, one can
adapt the game to accommodate Edu-speak. It is sure to bring some
laughter; possibly relieve some tension; even if it fails to clarify
the lingo or bring about comprehension. Enjoy!
- Create
a 5" x 5" 'bingo' card, divided into twenty-five spaces: 5 rows
down and 5 rows across.
- Write one
of the following edu-terms in each space of the card:
| core competencies |
strands |
| best practices |
benchmarks |
| collaboration |
standards |
| strategic
fit |
social
constructs |
| embedded |
self esteem |
| school-to-work |
construct
knowledge |
| parameters |
paradigm |
| result-driven |
mindset |
| knowledge
base |
value-added |
| proactive |
student-led |
| win-win |
curriculum
framework |
| balanced
instruction |
authentic
assessment |
| teach
to the test |
|
- During
educational meetings, seminars and conferences, check off the
appropriate blocks whenever you hear one of the words/phrases
spoken.
- When you
get five blocks horizontally, vertically, or diagonally, stand
up and shout …
"HOMESCHOOLING MAKES MORE SENSE!"
October
27, 2003
Linda Schrock Taylor [send
her mail] lives in Michigan.
She is a free-lance writer and the owner of "The Learning Clinic,"
where real reading, and real math, are taught effectively and efficiently.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Linda
Schrock Taylor Archives
|