Gloom,
Boom & Doom Report
publisher Dr.
Marc Faber joins Infowars' Alex
Jones to discuss non-traditional investment strategies, global
inflation, social response and repercussions, and the phases to
expect as the crisis deepens.
(Full interview
available below excerpt and commentary)
Faber
on Inflation:
I think that
inflation or the cost of living increases in the US and elsewhere
is much higher than what the government is publishing. And, I
think this is having a negative impact on consumption, because
obviously the cost of necessities insurance, taxes, food, energy
is going up very rapidly. My answer to all of this is, the worse
the economic conditions will become, the worse the geopolitical
conditions will become, the more Mr. Bernanke and his fellow Fed
governors will print money.
Consumers in
the US are getting broker by the day. As food and energy prices
rise, consumers will be forced to adjust their spending habits.
Paying 30% 100% more for food at the grocery store means less
money spent at movie theaters, electronic stores and restaurants.
In turn, this spending adjustment in discretionary consumer spending
means more people will lose their jobs, and so too will people in
the industries that support those markets, for example, transportation
companies. It simply cannot be any other way.
The solution
from the financial masterminds in the White House and on Wall Street
no matter how jaded is, was and will continue to be the printing
of more money.
The real kicker
is, that as more money is printed, goods will continue to rise,
because most of that printed money ends up in speculative stock
market and commodity investments, further driving up prices on essential
goods. As those prices rise, there will not be an adjustment to
wages putting further pressure on consumer spending and job losses.
It's a negative feedback loop that simply cannot be stopped, and
the very actions we've been told are the solutions to our problems
are actually contributing to, and further enabling, the crisis.
Faber
on Stocks:
I'm not ultra-bearish
on equities. I think they will now correct because the market
is way over bought. And, so we can easily have a correction of
10% 15%. As soon as the markets drops, say, 15%20%, QE3 will
come into play. And all that is favorable for silver and gold.
The first round
of quantitative easing began around the time of the 2009 stock market
lows. Marc Faber
saw this coming in March of 2009, when he recommended to his
subscribers to take positions in stocks. Faber knew that The Fed
would pump as much money into the system as was necessary to change
the perception about our economic malaise. In that respect, QE1
worked. Stocks (and commodities) saw significant gains. While a
stock market crash may still be in the cards, the point that Dr.
Faber makes about QE3 should not be taken lightly. The US government
has already committed in excess of $30 trillion to resolve this
crisis. Be assured that they will keep going if they find it necessary,
regardless of the impact this will have on our national debt, the
US dollar or the end consumer, who according to Fed chairman Ben
Bernanke, is not experiencing any significant level of price inflation.
Faber
on Precious Metals and Value:
All of that
[money printing] is favorable for silver and gold. Now, the question
is, is gold and silver expensive or is it cheap? In 1999 you could
buy an ounce of gold for $252. Now it's $1400. Is it cheap or
expensive?
In a money
printing environment it's very difficult to decide what is expensive
and what is cheap because the function of money to be a unit of
account and a store of value has been lost through the money printing.
My view would be, yeah, relative to 1999 the price of gold is
expensive at $1400. But relative to the money-printing maybe not.
My advice
to all your listeners is to gradually accumulate gold. Don't buy
it on margin just gradually accumulate month by month.
…
I think the
US government is bankrupt. They will not default on the debt.
They will just print money. Not to own gold and silver is to trust
Mr. Bernanke. Now go and look at his speeches, and then you tell
me whether you rather trust gold or Mr. Bernanke.
Nominally,
gold has surpassed its record highs of the early 1980's (and silver
is well on it's way). In real terms, adjusted for inflation, gold
would have to hit roughly $2300 per ounce to have the same "value"
as what it had in the 1980's. When QE2 was announced in 2010, the
price of gold shot up relative to not just the dollar, but all global
currencies. One can surmise that QE3 would have a similar effect.
Add to that the strife around the world and the panic buying that
ensues in insolvent nations like Greece, where the street
value of gold during their 2010 riots was 50% higher than the
listed exchange values, and you can see the direction that precious
metals are headed.
From a preparedness
standpoint, gold should be a part of any complete emergency and
disaster plan. As we've mentioned in the past, and Dr. Faber suggested
in this interview, accumulate gold over time. You don't have to
invest all of your finances in precious metals but acquiring a
little bit every month wouldn't be a bad idea. The strategy of dollar-cost-averaging
let's you balance out your overall "buy" price in the event of volatility
where prices drop or rise rapidly.
With gold,
you don't have to worry about your US dollars, because you are,
in effect, your own central bank.
Faber
On Real Estate:
I think another
avenue is to own farmland. I think that real estate prices in
the US have come down OK, they may go down another 10% but
relatively to other countries and internationally, after having
declined, if you can find a house you like, it may not be a bad
time to buy a house in the US. It may not go up in value, but
it may preserve its value.
…
I know quite
a few extremely well to do people who have second thoughts about
life in big cities and security in big cities if the unrest in
the middle east were to also spread to developed countries. And
they also know that we might have problems with modern warfare
that would include cyber war, or switching off of the electricity
or biological warfare terrorism that would touch the big cities.
So, they want to be safe. They buy islands and they buy farmland
in the middle of nowhere.
We've suggested
in the past that real estate has not yet hit bottom and we maintain
this position. We could see housing collapse another 30% from here,
perhaps even more. However, the decision to purchase a home at this
point comes down to value.
If you are
looking to flip properties as a business like many did leading up
to the real estate detonation, you'll be hard pressed to generate
significant revenue. But if you have other intentions and goals,
it might not be a bad time to consider purchasing.
Farmland, for
example, is a real estate asset that produces commodities. Unlike
a suburban home with no real possibility for production unless
you're willing to do the work, farmland allows a family to generate
their own food, as well as their own energy essentially eliminating
the necessity of the ‘grid' on which most people depend. Not
only that, but outside of major cities you've got an extra layer
of security in the event of war, economic collapse or other disaster.
Additionally,
if the US dollar continues to be debased, which it will given historic
trends, we can expect interest rates on homes to start rising
significantly. In the 1980's rates exceeded 15% in some cases.
The following example demonstrates why it might not be a bad time
to buy now if you expect interest rates to rise:
Home Price:
$200,000
Current Rate: About 5%
Monthly Payment: $1073.00
Total Payments Over 30 Years: $386,500
or,
waiting until rates rise and prices decline 30%:
Home Price:
$140,000
Rate: 10%
Monthly Payment: $1228.00
Total Payment over 30 Years: $442,000
Unless you
plan on paying in cash after the next leg down in real estate, it
may be to your benefit to buy now and lock in a decent interest
rate, even if you expect a massive decline in prices. Additionally,
you may end up paying less simply because of inflation and (hopefully)
a future wage adjustment or earnings increase.
Faber
on The End Game:
We are in
the end game, but we are currently in a crack-up boom. A crack-up
boom is when you postpone a recession through money printing and
credit growth. The credit growth is not created in the private
sector but it's much worse it's in the government sector.
The government is the most unproductive sector in economic life.
So, this
crack-up boom will end very badly.
But, before
it ends badly, we'll have money printing, very high inflation,
and when everything fails the US will go to war. They are already
in war, but they'll increase it.
Our economic
policies dictate that no other end result can come of it. While
Dr. Faber gives the "end of the end game" a time frame of roughly
seven to ten years, there are many variables in play, any of which
can set the whole powder keg off at any given time.
As was suggested
in If
You Believe It Or Not, It Doesnt Matter, it is possible that
we are already on an accelerated path to a collapse of the world
as we have come to know it.
Listen
to Marc Faber and Alex Jones (February 21, 2011):