An elder
Cherokee was teaching his grandchildren about life. He said
to them, "A fight is going on inside me. It is a terrible fight
and it is between two wolves. One wolf represents fear, anger,
envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment,
inferiority, lies, false pride, and ego. The other stands for
joy, peace, love, hope, sharing, serenity, humility, kindness,
benevolence, friendship, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion,
and faith." "This same fight is going on inside you, and inside
every other person, too," he added. The grandchildren thought
about it for a minute and then one child asked his grandfather,
"Which wolf will win?"
The old Cherokee simply replied: "The one you feed."
For the word
"projection," a dictionary could offer no better illustration
of the meaning of this psychological trait than to quote a few
neocons. The practice of attributing to others one’s own "dark
side" (e.g., the fear that one might be capable of engaging
in some moral or illegal wrong) is essential to the health of
all political systems. We tend to be uncomfortable with the presence
of our "dark side" voices reminding us that, if adequately
provoked, we could resort to violence, or acts of dishonesty,
or other behavior we consciously reject. To alleviate such distress,
most of us are only too happy to have the state encourage us to
project our ill-motivated characteristics onto a "scapegoat."
Thus the
neocons – alarmed at the growing success Ron Paul is having in
focusing widespread popular opposition to the war machine that
is synonymous with neoconservatism – have resorted to projecting
onto Paul’s supporters attributes of their own. One American Enterprise
Institute hatchet man declared that Paul’s admirers "celebrate
the violent overthrow of established government." The explanation
for this charge? That November 5th – the anniversary
of Guy Fawkes Day, as celebrated in the film ’V’
for Vendetta – was used as the date upon which some $4.2
million was raised for Paul’s campaign!
The cable
television babbler, Glenn Beck, was not to shirk his neocon duty
to castigate Paul’s supporters. Yapping over a printed message
that read "there are enemies among us," Beck used the
Vendetta film as an opportunity to suggest that Ron Paul
might be appealing to people who want to use violence to overthrow
the government! Beck – more "knave than fool," to quote
Cervantes – trotted out the chameleonic David Horowitz to echo
the neocon party-line.
Let us put
aside the fact that the neocons are apparently unable to distinguish
the metaphorical nature of a motion picture from reality. I suspect
that, had Orwell’s Animal
Farm been used in such a figurative way, Beck would have
berated the Paul supporters for believing that farm livestock
could run a political system. I find the morally self-righteous
to be a humorless lot; for humor – like the use of metaphor –
challenges the rigidity of boundary lines upon which sanctimonious
thinking depends.
Let us focus,
instead, upon the charge that Paul supporters "celebrate
the violent overthrow of established government." Is there
anyone of such dull wit as not to see the psychological projection
inherent in such statements? What has the neocon-driven war machine
been if not a rapidly metastasizing campaign to promote "the
violent overthrow of established government," whether in
Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, or any other targeted country?
What
nation-state is more thoroughly committed to the "violent
overthrow" of other regimes than the neocon-dominated United
States of America? What government is more dedicated to the use
of terror – such as its "shock and awe" bombing of innocent
Iraqis, and the succeeding indiscriminate killing of Iraqi men,
women, and children – than that headquartered in Washington?
At a recent
Republican "debate" on "values," Ron Paul
was booed by neocon parrots for saying that Jesus was known as
the "Prince of Peace." What psychotic "values"
are embedded within the psyches of those who can condemn a man
for embracing "peace," and loudly cheer candidates whose
"dark sides" and their own run amok in a synchronized
dance of death?
Is
there any way out of our collective madness than for each of us
to return to that point of departure at which so many of us allowed
our "dark side" to become mobilized by ambitious men
and women? If we are to save ourselves, our children, and our
grandchildren from being devoured by the destructive forces that
we feed, we must look at what we most fear to see and to
accept: the "dark side" of our humanity. Only
by withdrawing our energies from such mobilized forces can we
rediscover the "values" that the power-brokers want
booed off the stage: the central role that peace and liberty
play in the better sense of what it means to be human.