Insanity
by
Charley
Reese
by Charley Reese
DIGG THIS
President
George Bush and his tag-along buddy John McCain are repeating almost
word for word about Iran the pattern of lies and threats they used
to justify the war against Iraq.
Our intelligence
agencies have said that Iran gave up the pursuit of a nuclear weapon
three years ago. President Bush makes speeches as if he's never
heard of any intelligence agencies. That's what worries me about
President Bush. His words very often defy and contradict reality.
Recently,
he almost repeated word for word a theme he often used in the buildup
to the Iraq aggression. It was, he said, unthinkable to allow "the
most dangerous regime to acquire the most dangerous weapons."
This guy might actually launch an attack on Iran before his term
expires. If he does, you can kiss the world economy goodbye. You
don't like $4-a-gallon gas? How about $10 a gallon?
In the first
place, Iran is far from the most dangerous regime in the world.
I would say it is not dangerous at all, so far as the United States
is concerned. Except for idiots, sane people assess threats based
on capability, not on political rhetoric, intentions or imagination.
So what are
the capabilities of Iran? It has no nuclear weapons. We have about
3,000 or more. One American submarine could destroy the entire country
of Iran and its population. Iran has no missiles that could reach
us. It has no aircraft that could reach us. Its army couldn't even
defeat Iraq.
So what I
want to know is how in the blankety-blank Hades Bush and McCain
define the word "dangerous"? When their statements about
Iran are placed side by side with the known facts, Bush and McCain
sound insane.
Nothing alarms
me more than the thought of an irrational person in the White House.
I'm OK with stupid. I can live with venal. I can tolerate a womanizer,
even a drunk, but a crazy person in command of our nuclear forces
gives me the heebie-jeebies. Somebody who can't tell the difference
between a nuclear-free Iran with no ICBMs and Russia with thousands
of nuclear warheads sitting atop advanced intercontinental missiles
has no business being allowed in the White House, even as a tourist.
There are
two countries that have the capability of being a threat to us
Russia and China. That's foreign policy and geopolitical strategy
at the kindergarten level. They have the capability. No other country
in the world does. Only a moron would worry more about an ex-college
professor with a long name whose office doesn't even control the
armed forces than he would about Vladimir Putin. This present American
administration, in one of the dumbest moves in the history of diplomacy,
neglected our relations with Russia while it got us bogged down
in two small desert countries that don't amount to a hill of coffee
beans.
Also
bear in mind that it doesn't matter diddly squat if some small country
manages to make a few nuclear weapons. A few is no threat to many.
Nobody with a few would be tempted to attack any country with many
nuclear weapons.
Deterrence
worked when the Soviet Union had 30,000 nuclear warheads, but these
moronic, unscrupulous, intellectually dishonest, dishonorable neocons
would convince you that deterrence wouldn't work against Iran.
I know most
secular folks equate religion with insanity, but they are not the
same. Iran is a religious nation, but its leaders are not crazy.
They are smart and well-educated. They fought a long, grueling war
with Iraq, and I think what they want more than anything else is
a little peace and prosperity. But I think they are worried about
Bush, McCain and Israel, and I don't blame them.
May
24, 2008
Charley
Reese [send
him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.
©
2008 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
Charley
Reese Archives
|