Mexico and Mexicans
by
Fred Reed
by Fred Reed
When
I write that I like Mexico, that it enjoys much that we have lost,
that Latin societies are more livable if less prosperous than ours,
dismissive letters arrive. They amount to the same letter: "If
Mexico is so great, how come they all want to come to the United
States?" The writers invariably believe that they have made
a telling point.
Mexico
is not so great, of course. It has plenty of problems. But why do
Mexicans swim the river? Money. Period. If asked, an immigrant will
usually say that he seeks "una vida mejor,"
a better life. He means "Money."
Mexicans
and gringos have distinctly different views of the United States.
An American explaining the attractiveness of his country will usually
say, "I have a big house in the suburbs, three cars, a home
theater, and 300 channels on the cable. I can drink the water, and
in the mall I can buy anything, absolutely anything." He may
talk of freedom and democracy, often having only the vaguest idea
of whether he actually has them or what conditions might be in other
countries.
A
Mexican is more likely to say, "They are such a cold people.
They don't know their neighbors. They don't know their
children. They have no fiestas. Rules and being on time are more
important to them than other people. They have no religion."
(To a robust Catholic, bland agnostic Protestantism isn't
detectibly a religion.) Democracy means little to an illegal with
a second-grade education; in any event, Mexico is probably as democratic
as the United States. He knows the government left him alone in
Mexico, which is his definition of freedom. And mine.
But
money counts when you don't have any. It counts a lot. And so they
come whether they like the country or not. Very often they do not.
This is going to matter.
Now,
do the "all Mexicans" of my mail want to emigrate, to
attach themselves to the northern nanny's promiscuous dugs?
No. Few do. Who then are the emigrants?
For
starters, they are not doctors, chemists, and airline pilots. Successful
Mexicans do not want to go to the United States. Mexicans who are
merely comfortable do not want to go to the United States. They
like Mexico. This is very difficult to explain to most Americans,
who know beyond doubt that Mexico has lesser malls. But it is a
fact.
The
Mexicans who go north are the losers, the failures, the barely if
at all literate, those with little to offer. They go because the
Mexican economy is wretched, because the jobs that left the United
States for Mexico are now leaving Mexico for China. Money. The United
States can run a first-world economy. Mexico cannot. Why is debatable.
The fact isn't.
While
Mexicans are good people, their dregs often are not. On average
the immigrants are uncultivated, uneducated, and of low intelligence.
One may not mention the matter of intelligence, but it is well known
among people who pay attention to such things, and has implications
for the future. America is getting those Mexicans least worth getting,
the least assimilable, and getting them in circumstances that do
not encourage assimilation. Unlikely to prosper, they show signs
of becoming another unsalvageable underclass.
Being
Latins, they are not comfortable in an impersonal, technological
northern European culture that values performance, competition,
efficiency and punctuality. It isn't their way. Often they
plan to make money and return to Mexico; many then develop ties
and remain. Yet even then they stay among their own. Their numbers
as they swarm across the border are such that they can do it. If
they don't want to assimilate, don't have to assimilate,
and don't have the wherewithal to assimilate—don't
expect assimilation.
Further,
Latin Americans resent the United States for its great wealth and
for their own poverty, which they tend to blame on exploitation
by American corporations. Whether this characterization is correct
(it isn't) doesn't matter. The resentment does.
Mexicans
know that much of the American southwest was once part of Mexico,
taken from them by force of arms. Americans, having been the victors
and in any case being historically illiterate, know little of this.
Mexicans do. Few know the dates or the politics, yet they have a
sense of grievance, a sense that these states are really theirs.
They are getting them back. They know it. They view the reconquista
with the relish with which they watch a Mexican soccer team beat
the US.
Their
envy, their sense of inferiority and of failure, breeds hostility
in the southwestern barrios. This is far less true of Mexicans in
Mexico. In a couple of years in the interior, I have found people
to be friendly and courteous. The only exceptions, apart from my
experiences during a couple of unwise forays into seriously low
bars, have involved males who clearly had spent time in the US.
Comparisons
are made between Mexican immigrants and, say, Italians, a Latin
people who melded well into American society. A word of caution
here: Assimilation is proportional to contact. When a minority population
is sufficiently large, and sufficiently concentrated, the consequence
is not assimilation, but the establishment of a sort of country
within a country. There are for example countless huge black regions
of the cities where one can go for days without seeing a white face.
Whites barely know that these places exist. The inmates are not
assimilating. The same appears to be happening with the Mexicans.
Perhaps
as important, past immigrants have cut their ties with their native
countries, and have arrived with the conscious desire of becoming
Americans. Mexicans, very often, do not want to be Americans, and
the mother country is right across the border. The phrase "trans-border
de facto semi-sovereignty" is not Milton. It merits thought.
Worse
for America, much worse, is that far too many of them perform terribly
in school. Dropout rates are very high, auguring ill for the future.
Mexicans are not an academic people (as, increasingly, neither are
Americans). In the barrios, their Spanish is barbarous. So is their
English. Crime is high. The press will not talk much about crime,
but the police know.
And—here
I am on statistically shaky ground, as there are no statistics—the
young too often seem to be assimilating to the black underclass
rather than to the central white current. Mexican machismo and the
ghetto strut of the black underclass have much in common. Rap is
popular among low-class Mexican males. It is the music of defiant
losers, of macho swagger and rejection of white America.
Black
and Mexican won't unite. They don't like each other. Anger will
come when the growing and better organized Mexicans take the southwestern
cities from the blacks. One country, three nations, little compatibility,
and no love lost.
September
13, 2004
Fred
Reed [send him mail]
is author of Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a Well.
Copyright
© 2004 Fred Reed
Fred
Reed Archives
|