Freedom Communications, R.I.P.
by
John Seiler
by John Seiler
Previously by John Seiler: McCain
Flips Out on Leno
A great friend
of freedom died Tuesday, when Freedom Communications filed
for bankruptcy. Owned since its founding in the 1920s by the
Hoiles family, Freedom now effectively is owned by its banks. Long
the journalism profession’s major proponent of libertarianism through
its 30 daily newspapers and eight TV stations, Freedom’s demise
casts uncertainty over the continuation at the newspapers of the
"freedom philosophy," as company stalwarts call it.
R.C. Hoiles
(1878–1970) was a flinty old newspaperman who relished a fight into
his nineties. He loved to debate public school superintendents,
who headed what he always accurately called "government schools"
or "gun-run schools." People encountering R.C. on the
streets were left with a libertarian pamphlet on one topic or another.
A 1986 review
of his life by Carl Watner in The Voluntaryist described
one of his most famous battles:
Hoiles "entered
into one of the bitterest newspaper fights in the history of the
publishing business in Ohio." The Hoiles paper in Lorain had exposed
the corruption prevalent in the awarding of paving contracts to
the Highway Contracting Company of Cleveland. Horowitz, the owner
of this company, was eventually shown to be the owner of the newspapers
in Lorain and Mansfield, both of which strove to "get even" with
Hoiles for his part in exposing the fraudulent practices. The
rivalry between Horowitz and Hoiles prevailed till 1931, but in
the meantime the front porch of the Hoiles home was destroyed
by an explosion in November 1928, Hoiles' car was wired with dynamite
(which fortunately failed to detonate), and a dud bomb was discovered
in the office of the Mansfield News. None of this
gangsterism was ever explained, but it did motivate R.C. into
selling the papers in Mansfield and Lorain.
He moved to
California and in bought The Santa Ana Register (later named
The Orange County Register),
which became the flagship for the company. But even brought R.C.
into conflict with corrupt government power:
During the
New Deal days, R.C. became a victim of New Deal legislation. He
had effected the sale of his two papers in Ohio in 1931, but according
to the terms of settlement he was not to receive all of the proceeds
until 1935. By that time FDR had devalued the dollar and nullified
the gold clause in all private contracts. As R.C. expressed himself
in a private letter to Robert LeFevre, written on February 4,
1964, he "had a little experience" with the government abrogation
of contracts whereby "I lost $240,000 [at least $10 million in
2009’s inflated money]." It was for this reason, if no other,
that, he concluded, government should have nothing to do with
money or credit.
Defending
Japanese-Americans
R.C.’s perch
on the California coast providentially brought him to his finest
hour as owner of The Register. During World War II,
The Register was one of the few newspapers in America
to oppose the putting of Japanese-Americans in concentration camps
by Franklin "Dictator" Roosevelt and California Attorney
General (later Gov.) Earl Warren. R.C.’s editorials were especially
pertinent as he was located in the area where the Japanese were
being kidnapped and exiled.
An excellent
article describing R.C.’s heroism was published by Register
senior editorial writer and columnist Steven Greenhut. It’s worth
reading the whole thing. A follow-up article is
here.
Greenhut wrote:
What were
newspapers saying?
An editorial
in the March 6, 1942, San Francisco News argued:
Japanese
leaders in California who are counseling their people, both
aliens and native-born, to cooperate with the Army in carrying
out the evacuation plans are, in effect, offering the best possible
way for all Japanese to demonstrate their loyalty to the United
States.
By contrast,
here was Hoiles on Feb. 5, 1942, before the internment order was
announced:
The recommendation
of the grand jury to have all alien enemies removed from Orange
County calls for a difficult undertaking. Every bit of wealth
that these workers are prevented from creating, which we so
badly need during the war, will have to be created by the labor
of some other worker.
Of course,
there is no such thing as absolute security. We must run some
risks in every move. Risks are life itself.
"It would
seem that we should not become too skeptical of the loyalty
of those people who were born in a foreign country and have
lived in the country as good citizens for many years. It is
very hard to believe that they are dangerous."
Throughout
the year, the Register printed columns that worried,
in general, about the state of civil liberties in the nation.
By October, Hoiles stepped up the criticism of the internment
specifically, calling for a rollback of the order and a rethinking
of the evacuation process.
In an Oct.
14, 1942, editorial, the Register argued,
Few, if
any, people ever believed that evacuation of the Japanese was
constitutional. It was a result of emotion and fright rather
than being in harmony with the Constitution and the inherent
rights that belong to all citizens.
As Greenhut
notes, to this day the survivors of the crimes of FDR and Warren
are grateful for R.C.’s efforts defending them.
Libertarian
Leader
After the war,
R.C. continued his long, difficult fight for liberty. He published
such great libertarians as Frank Chodorov, Rose Wilder Lane, Robert
LeFevre, Ludwig von Mises, and Leonard Read.
He much respected
Mises, but was not afraid to tackle him from a position close to
the anarchism of Murray Rothbard. Watner writes:
Once he challenged
Ludwig von Mises on his "contention that we have to have monopolistic
local, state, and federal governments to protect our lives and
property." The two were personally acquainted as R.C. had at one
time in the mid-1950's invited von Mises to lecture in Santa Ana,
at R.C.'s expense. Some years later, in 1962, R.C. directed a
letter to von Mises in New York, asking him to reconsider his
rejection of voluntary defense agencies. R.C. said that he saw
von Mises doing so much good on behalf of free enterprise and
free market economics, that he hated to see von Mises "continue
to advocate any form of socialism, or any form of tyranny. And
when you are advocating that the free market is not the better
way of protecting man's lives and property, I think you are serious
in error... ." There is no record of von Mises' response.
That was pretty
cheeky, given that Mises was the world’s foremost economist and
libertarian and the scholar who
demolished the theoretical arguments for socialism. But R.C.’s
stance foreshadowed the total critique of government by Mises disciples
Rothbard and Hans-Hermann
Hoppe.
Libertarian
philosopher Tibor Machan began writing columns for R.C. in the late
1960s, something he has continued at The Register for more
than four decades. He recalls how R.C. asked him to drop out of
college and come to work at The Register as an ad salesman.
Tibor declined, finished his academic studies through his Ph.D.,
and today is Freedom’s
libertarian adviser.
The
Next Generations
After R.C.’s
death in 1970, his three children and several grandchildren carried
on his libertarian philosophy. Unfortunately, a family split developed
in the 1980s when son Harry Hoiles didn’t like how the company was
being run and wanted to split up the company to get his equity.
A long legal dispute was resolved against him.
I joined The
Orange County Register in 1987 as an editorial writer hired
by then-Editorial
Director K.E. Grubbs Jr. I stayed for 19 years until 2006, when
I took a buyout as the paper began its decline. The best thing about
the paper was that every politician in Orange County knew The
Register would oppose all new taxes and regulations. We didn’t
win every fight, but won many. This is the reason, I believe, that
Orange County’s taxes and regulations are significantly lower, and
its employment and economic growth rates higher, than in neighboring
Los Angeles, which must suffer the leftist Los Angeles Times’ perpetual
yelps for higher taxes and more government.
In recent years,
major campaigns have included Senior Editorial Writer Alan Bock’s
efforts to legalize medical marijuana, about which he wrote
a book; and Greenhut’s efforts against eminent domain abuse,
which also produced a
book. Both men are well known to LRC readers and to libertarians
around the country. (You can get either book now on Amazon for a
couple of bucks.)
And I must
have written 100 articles pointing out that California’s wild spending
couldn’t last, and the state budget would implode during the next
recession – which turned out to be the Bush-Greenspan Depression
we’re now suffering. I also wrote numerous articles warning about
the Greenspan inflation and how it would lead to a bust.
All of us were
followers of Austrian economics and fans of Ron Paul, H.L. Mencken,
LRC, Antiwar.com, and numerous
other great defenders of liberty.
The Commentary
section also produced award-winning cartoons by Mike Shelton and
illustrations by Art Director Jocelyne Leger. Some of their current
work is at PoliticalB******s.com.
Against
Bush’s War
But during
my tenure, The Register’s finest hour came in 2002–03,
when we were one of the few newspapers in the country to oppose
Bush’s unjust, unconstitutional, and unconscionable Iraq War. Most
of those editorials were written by Bock, with Greenhut and myself
chipping in.
As early as
August 23, 2002, I wrote an
editorial warning about the horrors to come should Bush invade
Iraq, as it was becoming clear he would. Bush and his retinue were
in Orange County, so I brought up the Weinberger-Powell Doctrine
as a last-ditch effort to talk some sense to the Bushies. I didn’t
agree with the Weinberger-Powell Doctrine (because it still made
war too easy to start), but used it as a way to get through to Secretary
of State Colin Powell and others in the administration. It didn’t
work, of course. But how many newspapers, seven months before the
war began, warned:
One of the
major lessons of history is that wars never turn out as planned.
Saddam’s troops might collapse quickly as they did in the desert
in 1991. But this time, defending their own cities and families,
they might be joined by civilian guerrillas and fight like the
Somalians did in 1993….
It is Americans
whose sons and daughters, fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters
would die in a war. The people have a right to be heard on whether
it’s necessary to make that sacrifice. In recent weeks, House
Majority Leader Dick Armey, Sen. Chuck Hagel and other members
of Mr. Bush’s Republican Party have questioned the need to attack
Saddam. We believe a declaration of war should be passed by Congress
before any war….
Diplomacy
still works. Saddam has indicated that he is willing to allow
arms inspectors back into his country. This avenue at least should
be pursued seriously.
In conclusion,
the Weinberger-Powell doctrine means that, despite America’s overwhelming
global military power, that power should not be used unwisely.
It means seriously thinking through whether other means, especially
diplomacy, can be used to achieve an objective, looking at all
the ramifications of an action and formulating an exit strategy.
War is not
the first-reach answer, even in the new War on Terrorism, even
as the anniversary date [9/11] of its horrific opening round comes
into view.
I don’t know
if Bush or anyone in his regime ever read the editorial. And Bush
is famous for being stubborn and ignorant. But it still was a worthwhile
effort. Unlike almost every other newspaper in the country, we warned
our readers of the horrors to come in Iraq.
Family
Feud
Unfortunately,
in the early 2000s the Hoiles family feud boiled over again. In
2004, about 40% of the family was bought out by the other 60%. The
money was raised through a
$500 million loan from Blackstone and other equity firms.
This was the height of the Bush-Greenspan Boom, with the Bust seemingly
far distant. So the company probably was much over-valued, as was
the payoff to the 40%.
Up until that
point, Freedom almost never had borrowed money, certainly not such
a large sum. R.C. was allergic to borrowing. If the money had not
been borrowed, Freedom still would have lost much of its private
equity value in the ensuing years, but would not today be in bankruptcy.
The 40% of
the family that got the cash did well financially. In a free-market
system, that certainly is their right. But the real heroes were
the 60% who kept the company so it could still advance the "freedom
philosophy" for a few more years. I knew some of these family
members and they were great folks who prized liberty. I only wished
more family members had been directly involved in the business,
instead of hiring outsiders who didn’t know what they were doing.
Almost immediately,
the company began suffering problems. The Internet reached the point
where it was taking over ad revenues, especially through craigslist.
An ad that cost $60 and ran for a week in The Register cost
nothing and could be repeated indefinitely on craigslist. Great
news for consumers, bad news for newspapers. Circulation also crashed
as readers preferred getting their news online, usually for free,
shortly after it happened, rather than wait for it to be dropped
on their doorstep, at a price, the next morning.
In 2006, a
major Freedom management blunder occurred when the company blew
$20 million (for starters) on a new newspaper in Orange County,
the OC Post. It was a dumbed-down tabloid of the kind popular
with subway commuters in New York City, Chicago, and Philadelphia.
Except in Orange County there is no subway and almost everybody
commutes by car. The paper was
canceled just over a year later.
In 2007, the
Bush-Greenspan Depression struck hard, cutting ad and circulation
revenues even more. Other newspapers – The
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, The
Rocky Mountain News – started failing. The Ann
Arbor News closed and went totally online.
The
Register is profitable for now, but that is unlikely to continue.
Other Freedom newspapers cannot be doing any better. The eight Freedom
TV stations still have value.
Whither
Freedom?
Even though
I don’t work for Freedom Communications any more, I still feel a
strong attachment to the company. It gave me a voice for 19 years.
I hope the new owners keep the "freedom philosophy" at
what remains of Freedom Communications. But I fear that won’t happen.
New owners usually have their own ideas about running things.
Many times
over the years, Register readers told me that they only bought
the paper for the libertarian editorial page. How much circulation
would be lost if the editorial page became a mirror of the leftist
L.A. Times,
or, worse, a bland, moderate voice like USA
Today? It’s hard to say, but I’d suspect 10% or more. Especially
nowadays, with so many choices on the Net, blandness doesn’t sell.
Whatever happens,
the legacies of the Hoiles Family, Freedom Communications, and The
Register are secure as great champions of freedom. If America
had only a few more such newspaper companies the past 100 years,
instead of so many sycophants to government, we would not have lost
so many freedoms. And our fight to regain those freedoms would not
be as difficult.
September
3, 2009
John
Seiler [send him mail]
is a freelancer writer and marketing
consultant.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
|