When Trust Runs Out
by
Gary North
by Gary North
DIGG THIS
Every society
and every institution rests heavily on trust. There is active trust,
the result of "trust, but verify." I call this stage one trust.
Then there is stage two trust, which I call default trust: "Trust,
and assume that someone else has verified." Next, there is stage
three trust, which I call blind trust: "Trust, because there is
nothing else worth trusting." Then there stage four trust, which
I call tooth fairy trust: "Trust, despite all evidence to the contrary."
This form of trust is the foundation of all Ponzi schemes.
Bernard Madoff
took advantage of this final form of trust. He ran what is said
to be a Ponzi scheme of $50 billion. Or was it only $17 billion?
The initial reports are sketchy.
The magnitude
of these numbers boggles the imagination. How could anyone who is
regulated by the Securities & Exchange Commission run up bogus numbers
of $17 billion, let alone $50 billion?
More to the
point, if Madoff could do this, of what value is the Securities
& Exchange Commission? The SEC in this case has fostered the second
form of trust: "Trust, and assume that someone else has verified."
This form of trust is the most insidious, because it creates a widespread
mentality of trustworthiness when such trust is not deserved. It
reduces the investing public's suspicions.
Whenever widespread
regulation by government agencies lulls investors to sleep, investors
make investments that they would not otherwise make. Managers of
what are called trust funds defer responsibility for doing the necessary
due diligence. They can legally hide behind this excuse: "We invested
our clients' money only in investments regarded as prudent."
Prudent is
as prudent does. From October 2007 until today, prudent investments
have taken a financial bath. All the way down, the well-funded investment
advisors kept telling their clients, "Now is not the time to panic.
Now is not the time to sell stocks. Use this as a buying opportunity.
Buy on the dips. Maintain a well-balanced portfolio of stocks and
high-grade corporate bonds. Hold Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds.
They are recognized worldwide."
The hypesters
on Tout TV screamed: "This market is close to the bottom. Buy now!"
Government
officials issued no warnings. They even denied what should have
been obvious.
In a
long, detailed, and devastating article in the New York Times,
the authors savage the Bush Administration for its refusal to do
something about Fannie and Freddie as early as February 2003. The
article, in typical Times fashion, lays no blame on Congress,
especially Barney Frank, who promoted home ownership for low-income
constituents who could not possibly have afforded to buy homes under
anything like normal, i.e., low-inflationary times.
The article
tells the story of Armando Falcon, Jr., who ran the tiny and impotent
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. This was supposed
to be an official verifier. Like virtually all government verifiers,
it was expected never to call attention to problems with anything
remotely connected to the Federal government. These organizations
exist to foster stage two trust: "Trust, and assume that someone
else has verified." The Times reports: "In February 2003,
he was finishing a blockbuster report that warned the pillars could
crumble."
Mr.
Falcon's report outlined a worst-case situation in which Fannie
and Freddie could default on debt, setting off "contagious illiquidity
in the market" in other words, a financial meltdown. He also
raised red flags about the companies' soaring use of derivatives,
the complex financial instruments that economic experts now blame
for spreading the housing collapse.
Today, the
White House cites that report and its subsequent effort
to better regulate Fannie and Freddie as evidence that
it foresaw the crisis and tried to avert it. Bush officials recently
wrote up a talking points memo headlined "G.S.E.'s We Told
You So."
But the
back story is more complicated. To begin with, on the day Mr.
Falcon issued his report, the White House tried to fire him.
This was a
typical government response. Whistle blowers are regarded as traitors
in every organization. The government is no exception. Mr. Falcon
was blowing the whistle on a pair of over-leveraged government-related
but poorly regulated organizations. Falcon was the head of an organization
set up to regulate these two massive swindles, but he was never
supposed to blow the whistle. He therefore broke an unofficial rule.
He was going to be taught a lesson.
Mr. Falcon
survived, but resigned in 2005. He was replaced by James Lockhart,
an old high school friend of President Bush. On his watch, Freddie
and Fannie purchased $400 billion in sub-prime loans and alternative
mortgages, marketing these packages to investors. By mid-March,
2007, both companies faced bankruptcy. But the Treasury Department
did nothing. Treasury now ran policy. Its conclusion: no problem.
But
Mr. Lockhart continued to offer reassurances. In a July appearance
on CNBC, he declared that the companies were well managed and "worsts
were not coming to worst." . . . .
Mr. Lockhart
defended himself, insisting in an interview that he was aware
of the companies' vulnerabilities, but did not want to rattle
markets.
"A regulator,"
he said, "does not air dirty laundry in public."
This is the
heart of the matter. It always has been. It always will be. Government
regulatory agencies invariably become agents of the organizations
that officially are being regulated. This is the heart of stage
two trust: "Trust, and assume that someone else has verified." This
trust is fostered by the government and by the agencies supposedly
being regulated. The regulatory agencies' real economic function
is to increase trust, where trust is not appropriate, in order to
dupe the public.
At this stage,
investors' trust moves to stage three: "Trust, because there is
nothing else worth trusting." Investors bid up the assets' price.
This is the bubble phase of the market.
STAGE FOUR TRUST
Bernard Madoff
was able, on paper paper issued by his company to
generate 15% returns, year after year. It is not yet clear how he
was able to fool accountants. That he did fool them points to the
nature of the beast. We are living in an economy that is one gigantic
Ponzi scheme.
The most famous
one is Social Security. It is known to be a Ponzi scheme by anyone
who examines its funding. This has been known for a generation.
No one cares, least of all government accountants. Medicare is an
even larger Ponzi scheme. Yet Warren
Buffett assures us that the American economy can grow its way
out of the looming unfunded liabilities of these two organizations.
All it will take is a little prudence an asset which retains
its low price in Washington only because there is so little demand.
When the best
and the brightest insist that there is no major problem with the
two largest Ponzi schemes in history, the public has moved to stage
four trust: "Trust, despite all evidence to the contrary."
Madoff took
advantage of a mindset that is so widespread today that voters,
investors, and politicians not only believe in tooth fairy economics,
they take active steps to ridicule those who call attention to the
evidence to the contrary.
Madoff also
understood marketing. The late Mac Ross once told me this secret
of marketing.
There
are two ways to market something: the community college way and
Harvard's way. The community college sells education on the basis
of price. "It's the best deal around. Act now!"
Harvard
sells a marginally superior form of education by telling people
that they just don't qualify. "We aren't going to accept you,
but if you really want to waste your time, you can mail in an
application."
Madoff adopted
the Harvard approach. Alexandra Penney, one of his victims, describes
her dealings with his firm. She had become a millionaire author.
I
suddenly had a lot of money. I was in my late 40s, and I felt that
I was just too old to have it in a plain old bank account. But I
was a creative person, not a savvy investor, so I asked around and
talked to my smartest friends with Harvard and Wharton MBAs. There
appeared to be a secret society of Madoff investors. A friend who
was older, wealthier, and more established somehow got me in. I've
always had good luck, and I thought it was another stroke of good
fortune to be invested with the legendary Bernard Madoff.
Ah, yes: access
to the inside track! There is a dream of every wanna-be investor.
Find the next Warren Buffett and let him handle your money. Yes,
Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway can be bought on the New York Stock
Exchange. All it takes is about $100,000 a share. But that is not
good enough for investors in dreams. She wrote: "There appeared
to be a secret society of Madoff investors." Yes, yes, that's it!
Get on the inside!
Every
month I got detailed statements, and my money looked to be growing
around 9 to 11 percent. It didn't seem greedy because I knew other
people who were making 15 or 20 percent. I thought, "This is just
a very smart investor."
On the contrary,
he was just a very smart con man a con man who plugged into
stage four trust. But he did not do this on his own. He got a lot
of help from the confidence industry's friends: government agencies
that operate their own Ponzi schemes, creating widespread trust
in impossible dreams.
The woman
who was conned by Madoff thought she was rich. She no longer thinks
so. She lived high on the hog. She no longer will. This scares her.
First, she
always wanted to be an artist. She used her money to buy a studio
in New York City. If she ever made a living with her art, she does
not say. It's too late now. The recession has killed the art market.
The
art market, as everyone pretty much knows, is dead. If I can't sell
my work, I am going to have to find some way to make money.
Indeed, she
is. Here
is the former editor of Self magazine who is going to
have to find herself in a competitive environment. This will not
be easy. She must now make adjustments in her lifestyle.
I've lived
a great and interesting life. I love beautiful things: high thread
count sheets, old china, watches, jewelry, Hermes purses, and
Louboutin shoes. I like expensive French milled soap, good wines,
and white truffles. I have given extravagant gifts like diamond
earrings. I traveled a lot. In this last year, I've been Laos,
Cambodia, India, Russia, and Berlin for my first solo art show.
Will I ever be able to explore exotic places again?
Frankly, Ms.
Penney, the rest of us really don't care. We have problems of our
own. She goes on.
Since
this happened last Thursday, I have barely left my apartment, I
haven't been out for dinner; haven't bought groceries. Can't remember
the last time I ate a full meal. Food, which is one of my most favorite
things in the world, has become meaningless.
The reality
of Ponzi schemes eventually comes to this, whether the victims are
rich or poor. Reality intrudes.
The entire
Western world is trapped in a Ponzi scheme sold by politicians:
free lunches in our golden years of retirement. Social Security
will provide this. Socialized medicine will provide this.
I spoke with
a health insurance agent last week. He had come at my request to
discuss Medicare B. This is the physician-coverage section of Medicare.
Medicare A covers hospitalization. This new Plan B will give me
free prescriptions, which I don't take. It will give me access to
any physician's office at $5 per visit. I will get partial dental
care. All I will pay is about $1,000. In my previous location, northern
Mississippi, my agent said in 2007 the average payment per enrollee
per year was over $6,000. This is a region with a low cost of living.
This is a
Ponzi scheme. As the population ages, there will be too many recipients
and too few new entrants into the scam. We know what is going to
happen. But the best and the brightest say we are wrong, that everything
is covered, that experts have verified everything, that we will
grow out way out of this.
TRUST
IS RUNNING LOW
The stock
market in 2008 proved to 401(k) investors what I had told my readers
in March 2000: the stock market is not going to provide positive
returns any longer. The dreams of millions of investors have not
been smashed not yet. They will be, but not yet. The dreams
have been called into question. There is real doubt that the stock
market will recover fast enough to give investors their golden retirements.
The 401(k)
programs are also Ponzi schemes. They depend, not on economic growth
to provide wealth, but rather new investors in the stock market.
Earnings are insufficient to provide the income required to provide
a comfortable retirement. After deducting fund expenses, until 2008,
earnings were zero or close to it. The dream of easy retirement
always rested on the sale of shares to newcomers. This is Ponzi
scheme financing.
American households
are net dis-savers today. They have been for almost a decade. Who
is going to buy the shares of retirees? Not the coming generation.
Trust in stocks
as a way to wealth is fading. This is a good thing, because the
trust was always misplaced.
What
will replace this fading trust in stocks? Another problem: When
people sell their shares in the final phase of the falling stock
market, pushing stocks lower, who will buy them? Who will believe
that, after nine years of losses, discounting for price inflation
20002009, that stocks will ever recover? In final sell-offs,
pessimism is widespread. This pessimism will be justified. Where
will the productivity come from in our new age of monetary base
inflation, corporate bailouts, and trillion-dollar annual Federal
deficits?
Who will buy
a Chrysler today? Who will buy General Motors shares? Who will trust
the hypesters on Tout TV, when they say to buy shares? Buy with
what? Their viewers are down 40% or more, and the decline may not
be over.
CONCLUSION
The American
dream, as with any dream, is based on trust. But trust, to be maintained,
must eventually be confirmed by reality. The economic reality today
is stagnation, rising unemployment, falling home prices, and bankruptcy.
Reality is
catching up with stage four trust.
December
24, 2008
Gary
North [send him mail] is the
author of Mises
on Money. Visit http://www.garynorth.com.
He is also the author of a free 20-volume series, An
Economic Commentary on the Bible.
Copyright ©
2008 LewRockwell.com
Gary
North Archives
|