North Korea’s
"Dear Leader," Kim Jong-il has long supported the
desperately poor nation he inherited from his father by playing
a game in which he truly excels, Pyongyang Bluff Poker.
Kim long
ago learned that frightening his neighbors and the United States
with nuclear weapons and truculent behavior was the best way
to get food and cash aid from the rich nations. Though North
Korea’s nuclear program was clearly designed for self-defense
and thwarting an American attack, both the Clinton and Bush
Administrations rose to bait and treated with the isolated Marxist
state as if it was an existential threat to the United States.
As his
economic woes mounted, Kim figured that staging a nuclear test
would shake even more money out of the imperialist devils.
However,
Kim’s tiny nuclear explosion four months ago backfired badly.
Japan, the leading potential target for North Korea’s potentially
nuclear-armed medium range missiles, went absolutely ballistic.
PM Shinzo Abe’s new conservative government began openly talking
about dropping Japan’s traditional military and strategic timidity
and adopting a far more muscular stance. This would include
the ability to strike at North Korea with missiles and strike
aircraft, beefing up military forces, and erecting a multi-layer
anti-missile shield.
China,
which lost 10 million people fighting Japan’s invasion of the
1930’s and 40’s, and never tires of beating the war drums over
alleged reborn Japanese militarism, also got seriously angry
at the Dear Leader for provoking the Japanese.
Beijing
fears Japan will one day use its huge economic strength to restore
itself to a major military power that would challenge China’s
growing might. China is concerned North Korea’s saber rattling
might induce Japan to produce its own nuclear weapons – which
it could do within three months. Some years ago, this writer
obtained a copy of a diagram for a Japanese nuclear device.
Beijing
reacted with unprecedented anger and criticism to North Korea’s
nuclear test, openly calling it reckless and dangerous. China
is North Korea’s only ally, sole source of oil, and supplies
much of its food. Soon after Kim’s nuclear test, Beijing started
squeezing North Korea by cutting back deliveries of oil and
foodstuffs.
The inevitable
ensued. North Korea was forced back to the negotiating table.
Secret direct North Korean-US talks in Germany in January reached
a tentative deal. Last week, the US, South Korea, Russia, and
Japan initialed a nuclear deal with North Korea in Beijing that
is a significant diplomatic accomplishment, but one that must
also be taken with an excess of caution.
North Korea
is notorious for backing away from deals, and, claims the US,
has violated numerous previous ones. The latest agreement, trumpeted
by the Bush Administration as a great diplomatic victory, was
really due to China’s intervention. Whether it holds up and
advances, or Kim is just buying more time, remains to be seen.
This column
has long predicted that North Korea would eventually be bribed
to junk its nuclear program. The US was not prepared to go to
war against North Korea which, unlike Iraq, could fight back.
Bombing North Korea was not an option since South Korea’s capitol,
Seoul, is within range of North Korean artillery and missile
batteries dug in to the DMZ. So payoffs were the only logical
recourse.
The latest
deal mostly mirrors the one offered North Korea by the Clinton
Administration in 1994 and denounced by Republicans as a "sell-out."
The Clinton deal was scuppered by neocons in the Bush Administration
who accused North Korea of secretly developing a Pakistani-supplied
uranium enrichment program. The neocons’ primary concern was
not US national security but the fear that North Korea might
sell nuclear warheads and delivery systems to Israel’s Arab
foes.
This time,
however, North Korea will not get a light water power reactor
promised under the Carter deal, but $400 million worth of oil.
In return, North Korea agrees to seal its Yongbyon reactor.
But under
the Beijing Accord, North Korea will still retain its nuclear
weapons and delivery systems. The secret uranium enrichment
operation the US claims North Korea has hidden away remains
unresolved. This and many other contentious issues were left
open for future discussions. They promise to be extremely difficult.
At least the Bush Administration wisely opted to deal with North
Korea in a step-by-step process of rewarding Pyongyang in well-defined
stages for each concession it makes.
American
neoconservatives are furious at President George Bush for what
they claim is pandering to "axis of evil" North Korea
in order to achieve a desperately needed foreign policy success
after so many gross failures.
What
really worries them, of course, is that direct talks with North
Korea raise the obvious question: why not direct talks with
Iran over its so far peaceful nuclear program? The neocons want
war with Iran, not talks, so the example of North Korea is undermining
their carefully developed strategy.
Meanwhile,
back in North Korea, Dear Leader Kim must be figuring out his
next poker hand. He could always play his favorite hand. Which
is to make a deal after torturous negotiations, agree to terms,
then break the deal. Then later resume talks, using the final
terms agreed to in the first negotiations as the starting point
for achieving even better terms in the new talks.