The Security-Industrial-Congressional Complex (SICC)
by
Robert Higgs
by Robert Higgs
DIGG THIS
Bringing our
fellow Americans to a greater understanding of the evils of a government-dominated
society and the virtues of a free society has always been difficult
and frustrating work. It's no wonder that Albert Jay Nock likened
it to Isaiah's
job. People are easily misled by promises of government salvation,
especially when they are consumed by fear for their physical safety
or their economic security. Making matters even more difficult is
the state's co-optation of a large number of people who have discovered
that in the United States the rise of Big Brother offers enormous
opportunities for personal enrichment – fascism's greatest advantage
over socialism.
The potential
for making off with such loot has long been appreciated in connection
with the military-industrial-congressional complex (MICC), and recent
years have witnessed another great bonanza there. Between the fiscal
years 2001 and 2006, Department
of Defense (DoD) outlays, excluding payments to military personnel,
increased from $217 billion to $366 billion, or by 69 percent (49
percent after the DoD's generous allowance for inflation). Nearly
all of this money finds its way into the pockets of the owners,
employees, and suppliers of military-contracting companies. We are
not likely to win many converts to the cause of liberty in this
crowd.
Alongside
this entrenched predatory monstrosity, the government has built
during the past five years a completely new and even more menacing
apparatus, which I call the security-industrial-congressional complex
(SICC). According to Paul Harris's September 10, 2006, report in
the Guardian:
"Seven years ago there were nine companies with federal homeland
security contracts. By 2003 it was 3,512. Now there are 33,890.
The money is huge. Since 2000, $130 billion of contracts have been
dished out." Harris adds: "With so much money on offer and such
riches being made, there is a powerful economic incentive to exploit
the threat to America. The homeland security industry has an army
of lobbyists working for its interests in Washington. It grows bigger
each year and they want to keep the money flowing. America is in
the grip of a business based on fear."
I tracked
one of Harris's sources to the informative Web site of the Center
for Public Integrity. If you want to become truly discouraged
about the prospects for liberty, spend some time perusing the center's
voluminous data on the lobbyists, their clients, the amounts of
money being spent, and so forth. According to these data, the number
of companies and other organizations registered as lobbying the
federal government with regard to homeland security increased from
3 in 2001 to 671 in 2004 (the latest year for which the center has
compiled such data). Small wonder that Alex Knott, manager of the
center's Lobby Watch project, declares: "All this money in the industry
is just up for grabs. It's like a gold rush."
No gold
rush, however, ever involved the massive amounts of money now on
tap in the SICC. To gain an appreciation of the contours of this
piratical apparatus, visit the Web site of Government
Security News (GSN), an online publication that bills itself
"the newspaper of record for government security." In only the few
issues I examined, I discovered enough material to throw any sane
person into a funk of despair for the cause of liberty. In an August
2006 issue (vol. 4, issue 12), for example, one finds a beautiful
advertisement in full color with the headline, "Looking for Billions
in Upcoming Government Contracts?" Underneath a pie chart depicting
the dimensions of the various categories of loot up for grabs, the
text continues: "Knowing where to look is half the challenge. Federal,
State and Local Government IT Spending Will Exceed $70B in 2007.
What are you waiting for?" After which the reader is directed to
a Web site "to learn more about System Integration contracts and
who's winning." You can be sure that the winners do not include
the taxpayers in general or the citizens whose rights are being
suffocated by the fear-exploiting opportunists who are rushing to
get rich by supplying goods and services to the Surveillance State.
Among the
many fascinating features in GSN are "Around the Country," which
describes contracts placed in various states (extensive geographical
spreading of government contracts, long an attribute of the MICC,
is a telltale sign of congressional intervention), "Contracts,"
which gives the details of recent awards, and "Business Opportunities,"
which describes "recent and upcoming government solicitations."
In the August 2006 issues, GSN features an eye-popping list of leading
SICC companies, which range from obscure firms such as 4D Security
Solutions, Alutiq, and Cernium to familiar names such as Boeing,
Diebold, Northrop Grumman, and Lucent Technologies. Come one, come
all. The only losers are the citizens' wallets and their liberties.
As in any
other dynamic industry, the SICC firms are being brought together
in trade shows to display and tout their new wares. (If you've never
checked out the trade publications and shows in the MICC, you don't
really know the meaning of gruesome, slick yet disgusting advertising.)
Thus, the GSN for August 2006 contains an ad for a massive trade
show to be held at the Jacob Javits Convention Center in New York
on October 2425. There you can "source new products and solutions,
make new contacts and gain critical industry knowledge." The participants
will include "9,100 industry professionals" and "more than 400 leading
exhibiting companies," including Bosch, Brinks, Honeywell Security,
Panasonic, Tyco, and many others.
GSN also
makes available a job
placement service, where employers and employees can find one
another. Among the nearly two thousand jobs listed, those for systems
and software engineers, IT managers, and other techie types loom
largest, but other sorts of jobs are available for you and me – well,
truth be known, probably not for me, but surely many takers will
come forth to occupy these well-paid positions.
After
all, the U.S. government is sparing no expense ostensibly to protect
all Americans from every known form of threat and from many threats
yet undreamt of, too. Americans expect nothing less from their government,
which constantly presents itself as their savior of first resort.
Strange to say, however, no one seems especially distressed by the
bogus quality of most of the goods and services being procured under
the rubric of "homeland security," a nebulous objective that now
elicits – not by accident, but by design – little more than
a gigantic exchange of political pork
for items that merely purport to protect Volk und Vaterland.
For present
purposes, however, the bad news is that the owners and employees
of the SICC firms are not likely to have any interest in joining
a movement to restore our lost liberties. On the contrary, these
people are literally Big Brother's little brothers and sisters.
However unwittingly, these private-sector facilitators and handmaidens
of the government's pervasive invasion of everyone's privacy have
formed a new bulwark against those who seek to divert the American
people from their headlong rush into tyranny.
October
19, 2006
Robert
Higgs [send him mail] is
senior fellow in political economy at the Independent
Institute and editor of The
Independent Review. His most recent book is Depression,
War, and Cold War: Studies in Political Economy. He is also
the author of Resurgence
of the Warfare State: The Crisis Since 9/11 and Against
Leviathan.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Robert
Higgs Archives
|