Fiat: Let There Be Blight!!
by
Paul Hein
by Paul Hein
DIGG THIS
Fiat money
has got to be the best racket around. A few years ago I calculated
that the interest earned on the national debt amounted to roughly
a billion dollars per working day. That’s a pretty good return –
mathematically, an infinite return – on "money" created
out of thin air by the lender, who does so pursuant to no law that
I know of permitting him – a private individual – to create what
passes for United States money.
But there are
problems, which multiply and become ever more severe as the fiat
accumulates. For one thing, it loses its "purchasing power,"
which is as close as you can come to fixing a value for an intangible
"money." That means that continued lending, which is essential
if the system is not to implode, becomes more difficult, as the
burden of debt accumulates, and the return on future investment
may not be sufficient to retire it. And foreigners, holding huge
dollar amounts, may be reluctant to acquire any more of the stuff,
and dump some of their cache while it will still purchase something.
Bad news for dollar creators; if people won’t use/save the stuff,
there’s less profit in printing it.
And, of course,
there’s the latest problem, recently in the news. The coins, admittedly
an insignificant part of the money supply, achieve a value, thanks
to their metal content, which exceeds their face value. Embarrassing!
The mint stopped
using copper for pennies some years ago, but even with that metal
comprising only 2.5% of the coin’s weight, the metal in the coin
is still worth more than a cent. Specifically, the "cent"
is worth 1.12 cents. Older cent coins, minted prior to 1982, and
containing 95% copper, are worth about 2.12 cents.
Today’s nickel
contains 75% copper. It’s worth almost 7 cents.
These facts
illustrate another problem with fiat: there can be no monetary standards
when the "money" has no physical existence. You cannot
speak of the weight or purity of modern money. Thus, we have the
situation, really incredible or laughable – or both – that a "cent"
is worth 1.12 cents, or, depending upon its age, 2.12 cents. Or
a nickel is worth 6.99 cents. What’s going on here? How can one
cent be 2.12 cents? Or five cents be seven? Fortunately for the
money-creators, few people give this any thought, and even fewer
care. How sad, since no problem faced by our society is more serious.
How is the
government responding to this situation? Not surprisingly, with
bluster, threats, and lies. Obviously, it would be advantageous
to melt down pennies, thus realizing about a 10% profit, before
expenses, unless the pennies were pre-1982, in which case there’s
be a 100% pre-expense profit. Uncle Sam wants to make this a crime.
"We are taking this action because the nation needs its coinage
for commerce. We don’t want to see our pennies and nickels melted
down so a few individuals can take advantage of the American taxpayer,"
declared mint Director Edmund Moy. Huh? It isn’t immediately obvious
how the "American taxpayer" would suffer from the melting
down of pennies. Besides, if the pennies actually belong to the
persons melting them down, they’re melting their own property. It’s
a bit hard to see how government, to save the banker’s face, can
make it a crime to melt your own property. No doubt the U.S. is
encouraged by the fact that, in the 1930s, when it became a crime
for Americans to own their own (gold) money, there were few objections
to the "law," and the people allowed themselves to be
robbed.
The mint also
complains that it now costs more to make pennies and nickels than
they’re worth. Do you believe that? The mint can purchase whatever
it needs, and pay the salaries of its employees, with Federal Reserve
Notes produced by its partner in crime, the Bureau of Engraving
and Printing. Federal Reserve Notes cost nothing to produce, since
they will pay the cost of their own production. Just print a few
extra ones, and give them to the suppliers, workers, etc. Use the
rest of this free "money" to buy copper, zinc, nickel,
and pay the mint workers. Thus, we, the people, foot the bill, not
the mint. The hapless citizen’s savings grow increasingly worthless,
and the buying power of his income shrinks, but Uncle has no savings,
and he can always supplement his income by boosting taxes, and/or
printing more of the "money." This will continue until
the stuff becomes so useless that the jig’s up. Then they’ll switch
to a new size and color bill and start over. Unmentioned in the
mint’s press releases, incidentally, is the profit from its other
coins, which cost significantly less than their face value to manufacture.
If anything
reveals the duplicitous and dishonest nature of government, it’s
the way it treats money.
December
30, 2006
Dr.
Hein [send
him mail] is a retired ophthalmologist in St. Louis,
and the author of All
Work & No Pay.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Paul
Hein Archives
|