Red October: Killing the Truth in Moscow
by Chris Floyd
by Chris Floyd
DIGG THIS
I.
Early October
can be dismal in Moscow. The short, harsh summer is over, the brief
and beautiful refreshment of September has passed, yet the snow
in which the city has its deepest life has not yet
come. Instead there is often miasma: gray days pocked with rain
or fog, vague and ragged days, neither autumn nor winter but suspended
in a limbo state.
They say last
Saturday was just such a day in Moscow: tepid, damp, fog through
the morning, clouds all afternoon, a limp breeze pushing at the
torpor. The muffled sunlight would have just begun draining toward
night when a young man dressed in black, carrying a 9mm Makarov
pistol approached the non-descript apartment building at
18/13 Lesnaya Street. His target was in sight: a woman, early middle
age, laden with groceries, walking toward the door. A few stray
lines of the setting sun might have split the clouds as he moved
toward her or perhaps it stayed dim, miasmic. He wouldn't
have noticed in any case: the door was open, they were inside, the
pistol was out, he fired a few shots to the body, one to
the head; the woman fell. Her life was gone; the job was done. He
dropped the pistol, as he'd been taught to do, and left the scene.
It was, they say, about 4:30 in the afternoon.
That's how
Russia's leading journalist, Anna Politkovskaya, came to die last
week. Many details of the death are still unclear and as
the Russian authorities launch their usual "thorough investigation"
of yet another reporter's murder, no doubt the details will grow
more and more muddled, more vague and ragged, until the chain of
accountability leading back to the real culprits, the instigators
of the hit, is lost in the murk. All we will be left with is this
stark, basic fact: one of the world's most fearless voices for truth
and human decency has been silenced forever.
II.
Who was Anna
Politkovskaya? Although her death generated a spate of headlines
in the Western media usually some variant of "Fierce
Putin Critic Slain" neither her name nor her work was
widely known outside Russia. She occasionally had a column in the
Washington Post usually whenever the prevailing political
winds from the White House turned temporarily cool toward the Kremlin
leader whose "soul" George W. Bush had mystically seen
into and embraced in 2001. Her devastating book-length critique
Putin's
Russia was first published in the UK in 2004 but
didn't appear in the U.S. until late last year, to little effect.
Yet inside
Russia, Politkovskaya a 48-year-old reporter working for
Novaya Gazeta, one of the last genuinely independent papers in the
country had come to be regarded by many as "the conscience
of the nation." This is a role that Russian society has long
required in its public life, from the time of the Tsars through
the Soviet period to the oil-state authoritarianism of today: some
prominent figure to serve in the absence of viable civic
structures as a moral counterbalance to the ruthless machinations
and arbitrary will of the ruling cliques. It has been filled by
such people as Lev Tolstoy, Boris Pasternak, Anna Akhmatova, Aleksandr
Solzhenitsyn, Andrei Sakharov and Yelena Bonner.
Politkovskaya
was thrust into this ever-dangerous role by the simple expedient
of reporting truthfully about what she saw and heard: in the killing
fields of Chechnya; in the drab kitchens of families broken by torture,
kidnappings, beatings, murders; in the anguished, fearful voices
of the Russian Army's own young recruits, brutalized, robbed and
abused by their own officers; in the courtrooms and command posts
and corridors of power, where death-dealing corruption flows like
a river of raw sewage overtopping its banks in all directions.
Like so many
of Russia's "consciences," Politkovskaya came from a relatively
privileged background. She was actually born in New York City, the
daughter of Soviet diplomats posted to the UN, although she returned
to Russia at the age of five. As the daughter of diplomats, she
had access to banned books, was sent to the best Soviet schools,
later worked as a writer for top Soviet institutions: the national
newspaper Izvestiya, then the in-house paper of Aeroflot,
the Soviet airline. It was the latter job that opened her eyes to
the reality of her native land, she told the Guardian in
2004:
"Every
[Aeroflot] journalist got a free ticket all year round; you could
go on any plane and fly wherever you wanted. Thanks to this I saw
the whole of our huge country. I was a girl from a diplomatic family,
a reader, a bit of a swot; I didn't know life at all."
When Mikhail
Gorbachev began his momentous reforms in 1985, Politkovskaya took
her newly-acquired knowledge of Russia's depth and breadth to the
independent papers then blossoming, as the Guardian reports.
There she documented the world-shaking collapse of the Soviet Union,
and the tumultuous casino of the Yeltsin years, with its volatile
mix of new personal and political freedoms, extreme social turmoil,
rampant criminality and clueless drifting at the center of power.
She was there for the first Chechen War, Yeltsin's botched and furiously
brutal campaign that ended in ignominious defeat.
She was there
too for the sudden and perplexing rise of the bland-faced former
KGB apparatchik, Vladimir Putin. Anointed, out of nowhere, as Yeltsin's
successor, Putin put an end to Kremlin drift, steadied the social
turmoil somewhat, curbed some of the rampant criminality, and curtailed,
often severely, the political freedoms that flourished briefly
and ineffectually in the post-Soviet era. But above all,
Putin was determined to renew the attack on Chechnya and eradicate
the results of the earlier debacle. Indeed, as Politkovskaya reported,
this unrelenting and ruthless new war would be the basis upon which
Putin would establish his presidential dictatorship and the overwhelming
dominance of his political faction.
Politkovskaya
once said the First Chechen War was "the Russian media's greatest
achievement." Dozens of brave reporters waded into the conflict,
reporting from the front lines and from behind the lines
documenting atrocities on both sides, bearing witness to
the homicidal frenzy that razed Grozny to the ground, and to the
murderous incompetence and brutality of the Russian military leaders.
They brought the war into Russia's living rooms, and as in Vietnam,
the folks back home were shocked to see what was being done in their
names.
But the Second
Chechen War Putin's war was the Russian media's greatest
shame, said Politkovskaya. Putin was determined to control the media
presentation. Independent reporting was virtually banned, although
approved "embeds" could join Russian forces and report
back gritty but ultimately uplifting reports of the "battle
against the terrorists." Those few reporters who went their
own way, like Politkovskaya, found themselves balked at nearly every
turn, and in danger from both Russian forces and Chechen freebooters,
as the war drove extremism on both sides to new levels of virulence.
But again and again, she brought back the goods the facts
and laid them out before the people. And she kept going back
to Chechnya in the war's aftermath, recording the new crimes and
atrocities of the thuggish regime of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov,
installed as the local boss-man by the Kremlin.
In fact, Politkovskaya's
last story for Novaya Gazeta which she was finishing
on the day she was murdered was another carefully documented
piece about torture under the Kadyrov regime. The story will probably
not appear now, the paper's editors said. Russian police have confiscated
her computer and all her files as part of the murder investigation,
while key bits of photographic evidence backing up the story have
mysteriously disappeared, the Moscow Times reports.
III.
That's who
Anna Politkovskaya was: a reporter, a mother (of two grown children),
a bearer of national conscience. But why was she killed? Who sent
the "tall young man wearing dark clothing and a black baseball
cap" captured on cameras in the foyer of the building, as the
Moscow Times reports?
Early suspicion
in the West has fallen heavily on Putin; that was the clear implication
of the many headlines and stories that identified Politkovskaya
largely (and sometimes solely) as a "Putin critic." But
whatever else you can say about this inscrutable little man, he
is not stupid. And Politkovskaya's murder would be a stupid move
indeed for Putin to make; it would bring him little or no benefit,
and a great deal of unwelcome heat at a critical moment.
Politkovskaya
had been criticizing Putin for years to no avail, in practical,
political terms. For example, this summer long after her
book had been published Putin played genial host to the G-8
leaders in yet another of their grandiose, meaningless confabs.
They were glad to come wine and dine with Vlad, to grip and grin
with him for cozy photos, to accord him all the respect due to the
leader of a great power i.e., one with nukes and oodles of
oil. Politkovskaya's years of revelations about the depredations
of his rule had obviously cut no ice with the great and good. Anyway,
she was known mostly for writing about Chechnya; and to Bush, Blair
and other leaders of the "developed" world, Chechnya is
now considered just another front in the "war on terror,"
with Vlad fighting the good fight against "worldwide Islamofascism"
(or whatever the term of propaganda art is these days). If he has
to play a little rough with those evildoers, well, that's just what
a Commander-in-Chief has to do sometimes to defend national security,
right?
Given the West's
tacit countenancing of atrocities in Chechnya, and its indifference
to Politkovskaya's revelations not to mention her increasing
marginalization in the Kremlin-dominated Russian media itself
her life posed no real threat to Putin. But her death makes her
a martyr, and is already dredging up some of her long-ignored attacks
on his regime. And this comes at a time when Putin is making a major
play to secure a prominent if not dominant role for Russia
in Europe's energy market, as well as playing hardball in "renegotiations"
of deals with Western oil giants. Why make trouble for yourself
by having the "national conscience" bumped off in such
a conspicuous way?
Kadyrov is
also a prime suspect, and a somewhat more likely one, although here
again, with the Kremlin backing him he was unlikely to suffer any
serious damage from Politkovskaya's stories, and ordering a hit
would have been a stupid move on his part too. Then again, thuggish
warlords who collaborate in the repression of their own people are
not exactly immune from stupidity. Other suspects include the ever-corrupt
Russian Army, which has often benefited from the sudden demise of
reporters who were looking too closely at its operations; or one
of the nation's criminal clans; or the ultranationalist groups which
had placed Politkovskaya on a death list for her "anti-Russian"
attacks on the nation's leader, as the Moscow Times reports.
Speculation
can even extend to forces trying to make Putin look bad agents
of Georgia or Ukraine, perhaps, both now being pressured heavily
by Moscow; or those Western oil giants, looking for leverage against
Putin's hardball, or maybe a CIA black op to bring him into line
on a Security Council squeeze play against Iran. Such is the murk
that envelops not only the Russian state but the entire grand chessboard
of geopolitics today that anything is possible, and most of it is
plausible. When "developed" democracies officially embrace
torture and aggressive war, flouting the very notion of law while
their leaders, like Dick Cheney, talk openly of "going to the
dark side," is it any wonder that conspiracy theories flourish
at every turn?
And in this
new world order of "dark siders" ruling by fear, force
and lies, is it any wonder that an unarmed teller of unwanted truths
would be gunned down in the miasma of a Moscow October?
Anyone who
craves light in this universal darkness, who prefers hard fact to
the blood-soaked fantasies of presidential dictators, anyone who
honors courage in the service of knowledge and compassion should
mourn the death of Anna Politkovskaya and take inspiration
from her remarkable life.
October
13, 2006
Chris
Floyd [send him mail]
is the author of Empire
Burlesque: The Secret History of the Bush Regime.
Copyright
© 2006 Chris Floyd
Chris
Floyd Archives
|