A New
Look at How World War II Happened
by
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
DIGG THIS
Nicholson
Baker’s new book Human
Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization,
is one of the most unique nonfiction books you’ll ever read. Based
on voluminous research of newspaper and magazine articles, radio
speeches, memoirs, diaries, and biographies, Baker’s 566-page book
gives the reader an extraordinary look into the mindsets of all
the major actors in the lead-up to the war.
Each paragraph
of the book is written like a press release of an important event
on a particular day, and is not necessarily related to the previous
or succeeding paragraph. At first I thought this would be an extremely
boring read, kind of like looking through old newspapers. But the
information in the book is so interesting (and sometimes astounding)
that I read it in one sitting (admittedly a forced "sitting"
on a 9-hour flight from Vienna to Washington, D.C.).
Many of the
icons of "the greatest generation" are portrayed not quite
as heroically as they are by their hagiographers and government-school
textbook writers. Perhaps the most striking facts in this regard
is how Baker portrays the real Churchill.
Winston Churchill
is shown to have been consumed by an extraordinary hatred of the
German people from an early age. "The British blockade"
of Germany, Churchill is quoted as saying approvingly in 1914, "treated
the whole of Germany as if it were a beleaguered fortress, and avowedly
sought to starve the whole population – men, women, and children,
old and young, wounded and sound – into submission." General
Sherman could not have said it better if one transposes "Germany"
for "the South."
In 1918 Eleanor
Roosevelt complained about being invited to a party by financier
Bernard Baruch, saying "I’d rather be hung than be seen at"
the party because the attendees were "mostly Jews." Her
husband Franklin, noticing in 1922 that one-third of the freshman
class at Harvard was Jewish, "went to the Harvard Board of
Overseers, of which he was a member," leading to a change in
admissions policy such that "over a period of years the number
of Jews should be reduced one or two percent a year until it was
down to 15%."
Churchill published
a newspaper article on February 8, 1920, in which he apparently
took a break from his unbridled hatred of everything German to declare
that his "real enemy" was "the sinister confederacy
of international Jewry," which he blamed for communism.
He then turned
his talents to India, Iraq, and other recalcitrant parts of the
British empire. Being given responsibilities for developing British
air power, he advised a subordinate that "I am strongly in
favor of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes." Subsequently,
the British air force "bombed and strafed rebellious tribes"
in Iraq, "fired on them with gas-filled shells, burned villages
. . ." Churchill congratulated the British commander "upon
the distinct improvement in the situation" in Iraq. If there
was a British Fox News Channel at the time, it would have spent
months celebrating the success of Churchill’s "surge"
policy.
Meanwhile,
the "Royal Air Force dropped more than 150 tons of bombs on
India" in 1925 to tame the "rebellious tribes" there.
War is hell for those who wish to secede from exploitative empires.
In the 1920s
Churchill admired Mussolini as much as he admired any man. "I
could not help being charmed by Signor Mussolini’s gentle and simple
bearing, and by his calm, detached poise in spite of so many burdens
and dangers," he said on January 20, 1927.
As
late as the mid 1930s Churchill was also heaping lavish praise on
Hitler. "Those who have met Herr Hitler," he said, have
found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an
agreeable manner, a disarming smile, and few have been unaffected
by a subtle personal magnetism." Has there ever been a worse
judge of character than Winston Churchill?
The man who
just recently had a statue erected in his honor at Hillsdale College
was a highly paid "consultant" to the munitions industry
during the 1920s and 30s, fetching $12,500 per speech, paid
for by such people as Sir Harry McGowan, deputy chairman of Imperial
Chemical Industries, which manufactured TNT, bombs, ammunition,
and poison gas. He went on multi-city tours warning of dire consequences
if the nation did not become "strongly armed." He was
an early 20th century Richard Perle, Bill Kristol or
Dick Cheney, to make an America analogy.
As soon as
Gandhi began influencing millions of Indians, he and some 60,000
of his followers were imprisoned in 1930. This led Churchill to
declare that "Gandhi-ism and all it stands for [peaceful resistance
to tyranny] will, sooner or later, have to be . . . crushed."
"Gandhi had replaced Lenin as Churchill’s arch nemesis,"
writes Baker.
Baker discusses
how the diabolically-evil Stalin, bosom buddy of FDR and Churchill,
intentionally starved to death millions of Ukrainians in the early
1930s, forcing survivors to eat field mice, insects, and dead children.
Baker also
provides chapter and verse of the evidence that FDR knew how horrifically
the European Jews were being persecuted in Germany and elsewhere,
but steadfastly refused to lift a finger to help them. When a reporter
asked him if there was any place in the world where the persecuted
European Jews should be able to seek refuge, FDR answered "No,
the time is not ripe for that." As far as allowing Jewish refugees
into the United States, FDR said in 1938 that that would be impossible
because "We have a [immigration] quota system."
Baker provides
additional information in support of the well-documented book by
Robert Stinnett, Day of Deceit, that FDR not only knew in
advance about the attack on Pearl Harbor, but had been orchestrating
an effort to get the Japanese to attack the U.S. for years. He correctly
anticipated that it would be the best excuse to get the U.S. involved
in the European war. He cites Henry Stimson’s diary where he talks
about a White House meeting with FDR on November 25, 1941 where
Stimson said: "The question was how we should maneuver them
[the Japanese] into the position of firing the first shot without
allowing too much danger to ourselves."
Once the war
was on, Churchill gleefully waged total war on German civilians
as well as its military. When asked why he was not bombing more
German cities populated mostly by civilians, he said "My motto
is business before pleasure."
British
subjects were sacrificed in order to heat up war fever, just as
some 2000 Americans were sacrificed for the same purpose at Pearl
Harbor. Knowing about a planned German air raid on Coventry, Churchill
made sure that the city was not warned. Five hundred people died
in the raid and much of the city was destroyed. Churchill did not
visit Coventry after the raid, but "asked for heavy publicity
to be given to the Coventry raid."
Baker also
cites some first-hand accounts from people who had met with Hitler
and came away with a very different opinion of him than the one
Churchill had formed in the 1930s. They said things like, his eyes
bulged out from his head in a most un-natural way; he had a maniacal,
unstable temper; he was clearly insane; etc. Most Americans of my
generation have always held such opinions, but it is interesting
to read these first-hand accounts of unmitigated evil.
The
words of war opponents are also chronicled in Human Smoke,
and the book is worth the price for these facts alone – facts that
are always ignored and dismissed as the rantings of "isolationists."
The book is dedicated to them for their heroic but unsuccessful
efforts "to save Jewish refugees, feed Europe, reconcile the
United States and Japan, and stop the war from happening."
May
1, 2008
Thomas
J. DiLorenzo [send him mail]
professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the
author of The
Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an
Unnecessary War,
(Three Rivers Press/Random House). His
latest book is Lincoln
Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe
(Crown Forum/Random House).
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at LRC
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at Mises.org
|