One Sure Way To Profit From Obamacare
by Don Cooper
by
Don Cooper
Recently by Don Cooper: Terrorist
State
One sure way
to tell which political lobbies stand to benefit from Obamacare
is to note who is supporting it with expensive TV and online ads.
I’ve seen commercials sponsored by big Pharma, trial lawyers and
now today on Abcnews.com I saw a big fold-out banner ad at the top
of the website sponsored by the American Association for Retired
People (AARP).
Not being a
senior citizen, I haven’t had much exposure to AARP, but when I
saw and read the ad, I couldn’t help but think how irresponsible
for them to use their influence over seniors to try and push something
on them like this with big, bright, colorful, intelligent-sounding
but misleading advertising.
Their ad consisted
of 5 what they call "myths" about Obamacare that they
want to clear up for their members and explain why they are false:
Health care
reform will be a government takeover
The details
of any healthcare bill are irrelevant. What needs to be
considered is only the fact that the government is planning on
regulating and hence distorting production and prices, in yet
another industry and the historical precedents set by the federal
government that never sees a government program die, but rather
grow with time. If it won’t be a takeover at first, it will be
eventually. Don’t call it a takeover then. Call it taking control,
call it regulating, call it whatever you want, it’s government
legislation that will force doctors and patients to make decisions
about their healthcare that they normally would not make. It introduces
the same moral hazard as any and all government regulation.
We can’t
afford to fix healthcare in this economic crisis
I agree with
AARP on this one. We can do something to address the high costs
of healthcare even in hard economic times: get the government
out of the healthcare business and address tort reform to prevent
frivolous malpractice suites. Both of which would save the government
and Americans money.
Healthcare
reform will be the end of Medicare
Don’t know
much about Medicare except that the U.S. government sold the program
in the 1960’s with the lie that by 1990 Medicare would only cost
the taxpayers $6 billion. By 1990 it had cost $67 billion in real
dollars. If nothing else we can use this as factual historical
evidence of government-run healthcare. What more does one need?
The government is always wrong with their predictions about anything.
Whether it be on purpose, otherwise known as lying, or ignorance.
Either way, they need to stop making predictions.
Healthcare
reform will lead to rationed health care
All economic
goods, which is everything except for air and sunshine, are scarce
and need to be rationed somehow. In a market economy that rationing
mechanism is price. As an economist who has lived many years in
European countries where healthcare is regulated, controlled,
provided by the federal government, I can tell you unequivocally
that YES, healthcare will end up being rationed not by price but
rather by some commission of bureaucrats who will set "guidelines"
for who can receive what care. That is in fact the whole purpose
of this healthcare reform: to reduce costs, to make costs equitable
across social lines. Those artificial costs imposed by government
intervention of any kind, will be lower than the true market value
and hence we’ll end up with a shortage and of course an excess
demand for healthcare. Then healthcare will have to be rationed
by other means than price. As with any economic good, as price
goes down more of the good is demanded. Of course the cost to
people won’t actually go down due to increased taxes, interest
on the debt and inflation that will occur so the government can
pay for it, but in people’s minds it will be cheaper. So
people will go to the doctor for any and all ailments. Dr. offices
will become overcrowded so they’ll start going to the ER which
will become overcrowded. So the bureaucrats will ration it.
I’ve seen
it firsthand. Not a single author of these bills, as far as I
know, has ever lived in such a country. They don’t know what they
are talking about, pure and simple.
Healthcare
reform means the government will make life and death decisions for
you
Absolutely,
they will. They won’t look at it as such, but that’s what it will
be. If someone needs medical care of any kind and they are not
free to find a doctor of their choosing from the entire doctor
pool but rather are given a list to choose from, and the doctor
is forced to only provide a government-influenced schedule of
services at set prices then again, the moral hazard issue dominates
here. Doctors and patients will make decisions that they otherwise
would not make without government intervention. And who’s to say
whether they are life or death decisions? Maybe some decisions
aren’t, maybe some are. Maybe a doctor would have treated a patient
differently which could have prevented or detected early some
life-threatening condition, but didn’t due to government regulations.
Maybe the patient would have died anyway. Who can say? But one
thing for sure, we’ll know that those decisions were not made
by the free will of the doctor–patient relationship and so we
cannot say that "everything was done to prevent it."
As with all
government intervention, the government assumes the role of being
our moral compass. They are in a position to dictate to an entire
nation of 300 million plus, what is the "right thing to do."
Of course they’re true objective is to get votes from people at
election time while at the same time, getting as much money and
power as possible from special interests, campaign donors and political
parties.
September
11, 2009
Don Cooper
[send him mail] is a Florida
native, Navy veteran and economist living and working in the Midwest.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Don
Cooper Archives
|