In Praise of Ryan McFadyen
by
William L. Anderson
by William L. Anderson
DIGG THIS
While much
of the hate fest that accompanied the Duke Non-Rape, Non-Kidnapping,
Non-Sexual Assault case has subsided, the vilification of one Duke
lacrosse player continues. Ryan McFadyen perhaps has received more
bad press in this affair, with the possible exception of
Durham District Attorney Michael B. Nifong.
I say "possible"
because next week Nifong goes before the North Carolina State Bar
for what most of us hope is the first of many trips to the legal
woodshed. The fact that "Nifonging" has become a "verb"
in legal parlance and his name has been cited by judges elsewhere
in association with legal travesties is gratifying, but even Nifong,
as evil as he has been, has not received the notoriety that McFadyen
has been given – and continues to receive.
The reason
this member of the lacrosse team has a prominent place on the Internet
and in Wikipedia
is because of an email he wrote to teammates early in the morning
of March 14, 2006. After two strippers had taken $800 from the team
and "danced" for about four minutes before beating an
exit from the infamous party (or perhaps "bust" is more
accurate), the players realized that they were had and were firing
emails back and forth afterward about having been "ripped off."
One of the emails came from McFadyen:
"Tomorrow
night, after tonights show, ive decided to have some strippers
over," the message read. "However there will be no nudity. i plan
on killing bitches as soon as the walk in and proceeding to cut
their skin off while cumming in my duke-issue spandex."
Anyone familiar
with Bret Easton Ellis’ novel American
Psycho can recognize that the email was a bad parody of
one of the characters. (One must understand that American Psycho
is required reading for many classes at Duke University, so I can
guarantee you that many students and faculty members – including
the self-righteous faculty members who signed the infamous "Listening"
advertisement – immediately recognized the language and the novel’s
character.)
The email was
sophomoric in tone, but, then, McFadyen was as sophomore.
Moreover, while I have not read the other emails in the exchange
that night, from what people who have read them tell me, it was
clear that neither McFadyen nor anyone else actually was advocating
violence against anyone.
Ultimately,
what is important about this email involves how police obtained
it, and what they did with it. I will go a step farther and say
this: Far from being the psychopathic villain that many blogs and
mainstream journalists have called him, the affair surrounding the
release of this email – the illegal release, I might add
– demonstrates that Ryan McFadyen has much better character than
his accusers, for McFadyen refused to commit a felony and
has paid a very high price for his integrity. I will repeat my claim:
Ryan McFadyen, far from being a "dirtbag
extraordinare," as one blogger called him, demonstrated
that he had integrity that is missing from the entire Durham Police
Department and the office of the district attorney of Durham County,
North Carolina. Let me begin.
First, no one
ever has officially come out and explained how Durham police
actually were able to obtain the McFadyen email and the others.
The players never turned over those emails, nor did investigators
ask for them. We do know that someone sent a bogus email from a
player’s address which claimed he was going to "give it up"
and tell police about the "rape." It almost certainly
was a plant from police, an illegal plant, which means that
someone committed a crime in writing and sending it, a crime for
which no one will be prosecuted.
While I have
read many discussions on the blogs as to how police obtained the
infamous McFadyen email, I never have read a definitive explanation
on what happened. It almost is certain, however, that the Durham
police illegally obtained the emails in question. Moreover, the
criminal conduct of Nifong and the Durham police did not stop with
obtaining the emails. It runs much, much deeper.
On April 4,
2006, Crystal Gail Mangum went through the illegal and improper
"photo lineup" of the lacrosse players. (Much
has been written about this exercise and even the City of Durham
officially admits that it was an "improper" mechanism
for choosing the alleged assailants.) This "lineup" was
the sole method by which Mangum identified anyone, given she had
already gone through six previous sessions with police and
had failed to point out any alleged "attackers." Because
the lineup itself was not done legally, police needed something
to bolster their case. Using DNA was out, since all of the DNA testing
had turned out negative, and there literally was nothing else to
demonstrate that Mangum had been raped, or that any lacrosse players
had raped her.
Having illegally
obtained the McFadyen email, Nifong and the police had him come
downtown for a "visit" on April 5 and presented the following
choice: either be willing to testify that he saw the "attackers"
in the bathroom with Mangum and turn state’s evidence on the rape
charges, or the authorities would release the email. One has to
understand what was happening. Nifong and the police were giving
him the choice either of committing perjury or being humiliated
publicly.
By giving him
this choice, of course, those involved were committing a felony.
First, they had broken the law in obtaining the email and, second,
they actively and knowingly were suborning perjury. People who commit
such crimes can spend many years in prison, but in this situation,
those who allegedly enforce the law in Durham were the ones who
shamelessly were breaking that law.
McFadyen, to
his everlasting credit, told police and the prosecutor he would
not lie for them. After all, there had been no rape, no kidnapping,
no sexual assault, no "brutal" beating, nothing. He had
seen nothing and would not testify to having seen that which did
not happen. Unfortunately, because of the state of law in North
Carolina, Ryan McFadyen paid a horrific price for showing integrity,
something that anyone in authority in Durham or Duke University
has yet to show, even more than a year after this affair began.
After McFadyen’s
refusal to commit perjury, Judge Ronald Stephens, the former Durham
County prosecutor who covered for his one-time employee, Nifong,
then released the email, which was given to journalists all over
the country. Stephens, a judge who has sworn to uphold the law,
ordered that an illegally-obtained email that had nothing
to do with the case be released and publicized because the young
man who wrote it was refusing to break the law (which Stephens had
sworn to uphold) by lying under oath.
The aftermath
of the release was predictable. Duke
University suspended McFadyen, and he is roundly attacked even
now. (The university lifted the suspension in late June, 2006.)
Writers from publication like Sports Illustrated and Newsweek
have claimed that he had done everything but commit Crimes Against
Humanity. A Google search turns up more than 80,000 hits, and he
has had his life threatened on more than one occasion.
In writing
this defense of McFadyen, a young man with whom I have had the opportunity
to speak at length about the lacrosse affair in general, I realize
that I am almost certain to receive hateful emails myself, as I
usually receive when writing on this subject. Yet, those who attack
McFadyen forget (or perhaps simply refuse to recognize) that this
is a young man who has integrity and demonstrated integrity when
the authorities demanded he lie under oath in a court of law.
Ryan McFadyen
is someone who paid a very heavy price for being honest. Duke University
has an honor code, but when one of the university’s students demonstrated
honor under real pressure, the university suspended him. Perhaps
President Richard Brodhead would have preferred that McFadyen lie
under oath and save the university the embarrassment of one of its
students having written a sophomoric email (for which McFadyen has
apologized repeatedly).
Given
the mountain of lies and outright criminal behavior coming from
those people who allegedly enforce the law in Durham County, North
Carolina, we should not be surprised at what happened. But throughout
this sorry affair, we can be thankful that at least one young man
was willing to undergo humiliation and vilification at a level that
few of us could understand in order to tell the truth. That
he had to pay such a high price for his integrity tells us everything
we need to know about the Durham police, Michael B. Nifong, and
the administration at Duke University.
June
5, 2007
William
L. Anderson, Ph.D. [send him
mail], teaches economics at Frostburg State University in Maryland,
and is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute. He also is a consultant
with American Economic Services.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
William
Anderson Archives
|