Democracy’s Debunking
by
Becky Akers
by Becky Akers
DIGG THIS
From the department
of "No Great Loss Without Some Small Gain": perhaps Leviathan’s
$700-billion bail-out and nationalization of the economy will finally
awaken Americans to the fact that we live in a dictatorship, not
a democracy.
Lovers of liberty
know there’s little difference between the two, and that only of
degree. But lulled by Lincoln’s
lie – "government of the people, by the people, for the
people" – Boobus "Baa Baa" Americanus fondly, foolishly
giggles however the State ravages him. Taxation stealing more of
our wealth than it leaves us? Hey, no problem: the thieves are us!
Little
kids gassed at Waco and a
mother murdered while holding her baby at Ruby Ridge? That’s
just us at work again! Feel
us up or photograph us naked before allowing us to board planes?
Wheeeee: democracy is fun!
But then along
comes the bail-out, and Baa Baa suddenly, overwhelmingly objects.
"Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, has received
nearly 17,000 e-mail messages, nearly all opposed to the bailout...,"
according
to the New York Times. "Senator Sherrod Brown, Democrat
of Ohio, said he had been getting 2,000 e-mail messages and telephone
calls a day, roughly 95 percent opposed." And Republicans are
hearing "much the same." Meanwhile, Baa Baa actually forsook
his TV, staggered off his couch, and took to the streets, with 200
protests scheduled nationwide last Thursday.
You might
suppose such intense opposition would send elected criminals scurrying
back to their holes. Certainly politicians who live or die by the
people’s will must abandon anything this vehemently, virulently
vetoed. But no. Even as protestors demonstrated and phones in Congressional
offices rang off the hooks, Our
Masters conspired at the White House. They are utterly, shockingly
oblivious to the serfs’ displeasure.
As is the
chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee,
Christopher Dodge – sorry, Dodd (D-CT). "We’ve reached a fundamental
agreement on a set of principles," he
lied. Who you fooling, Dodge? You wouldn’t know a principle
if it smacked you upside the head. Nevertheless, another of Our
Masters swore to Dodge’s whopper. "I now expect we will indeed
have a package that can pass the House, pass the Senate, and be
signed by the president," fibbed Sen. Robert "Robber"
Bennett (R-UT). Seems our fury didn’t so much as dent either cretin’s
cranium. How could it? – $165,400
and $107,999 respectively in "campaign contributions"
from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy impenetrable helmets. Meanwhile,
Dodge, Robber, and their accomplices worked over the weekend lest
any of us vassals retain a dime after bailing out Wall Street: they
spent another $634 billion of our money when they passed a "sprawling
spending bill...to keep the government operating beyond the
current budget year."
Over in the
House of Reprehensibles, Barney Frank (D-MA) disdains not only Baa
Baa’s preferences but his intelligence, too: "I'm
convinced that by Sunday we will have an agreement that people
can understand on this bill." Yo, Frankie-poo: the problem
isn’t that "people" don’t understand; it’s that we understand
too well.
Then again,
why wouldn’t this socialist
dismiss us as fools, given that the Baa Baas of Massachusetts have
returned him
to office for almost three decades? And that despite his
congress with a prostitute named Stephen Gobie. Leviathan brands
such transactions criminal, and Frankie frankly admitted his guilt.
Yet he was never charged or even arrested. Must be something in
the Bay State’s water: kill
a campaign worker or traffic in sex, and so long as you’re a
politician rather than a taxpayer, you’ll wind up in DC instead
of in prison.
Then there’s
Frankie’s "committed
relationship" with Herb Moses – so committed it lasted
a whole ten years. Talk about your temporary-romp-propagandized-as-"till-death-do-us-part"!
No doubt this was a match made in...well, for sure not Heaven. Herbie
happened to be an executive at Fannie Mae while Frankie happened
to sit on the House Banking Committee – which happened to oversee
the unconstitutional Fannie and other "GSE’s" ("Government
Sponsored Enterprises." Yep, there are so many of these scams
they actually boast their own acronym). Guess who vehemently defended
Leviathan’s mucking about in the mortgage market, denied
time and again that his boyfriend’s company was troubled, and
also pocketed $40,000
from the obliging Fannie for his pains? Sadly, the Congressman
the Washington
Post praised as "brilliant" may not be so astute
after all: Herbie left Fannie Mae and then, no longer in need of
a Committeeman, ditched Frankie a few months later. Perhaps Frankie
still carries a torch since he’s blaming the free market instead
of the GSE’s for the financial meltdown. Nor has the people’s rage
against a bail-out swayed him.
We find the
same imperious disregard for the electorate’s wishes on other issues
as well. For example, term limits, which New
York City’s residents have twice supported at the polling booth.
But it’s been 12 years since we last voted to throw the bums out,
so it’s time for another attempt at circumventing our will: Mayor
Michael Bloomberg and much of the City Council will otherwise find
themselves hunting honest work when their terms expire in 2010.
Ah, but it’s not their own interests that concern them. No, sirree:
as always, the tyrants have our good at heart.
G. Oliver Koppell, a Democrat from the Bronx, told the New York
Times that term limits "rob the public of a choice."
He mused, "If one looks at members of the City Council,…some
of the most creative served for 20 years." Creative, huh? I’d
like to see a non-Council thief try that: "Ya honor, gimme
a break, I was just bein’ creative."
Alas, Our
Masters fear we silly citizens will spurn their benevolence yet
again if we go to the polls. So this time they won’t entrust so
vital a matter to us. Instead, they’ve resurrected an
obscure precedent from 1961 that they claim allows them to void
our previous votes. Nor are they alone: despots
around the country are trying to topple term limits.
Also scorning
our screaming is that über-bureaucracy, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). One of its pet schemes is a national ID card. Coincidentally,
that’s the only totalitarian totem that Americans adamantly reject.
Whatever else they tolerate from Big Brother – public schools, checkpoints,
wiretapping, cops running rampant, torture – they consistently oppose
a national ID. And have for decades.
That doesn’t
faze the DHS. Brandishing the REAL
ID Act, it’s spent the last 3 years coercing the states to reformulate
their driver’s licenses according to its whims. Among other horrors,
those whims include linking the states' databases to a federal one
as well as RFID chips to track our movements. (N.B. DHS currently
denies plans to incorporate RFID; it also employs the biggest collection
of liars ever assembled outside Congress.) This has sparked the
most widespread rebellion since 1861, with 27
states passing resolutions or even laws against REAL ID.
Again, we
might expect bureaucrats in an alleged democracy to bow to the will
of the people. And again, we are disillusioned. Indeed, the fiercer
the opposition, the harder DHS rams REAL ID down Baa Baa’s throat.
Michael Chertoff, the agency’s head honcho, not only pits citizens
from defiant states against their governments, he threatens them
with sexual assault: "Chertoff
said… [they’ll] have to use a passport or certain types of federal
border-crossing cards if they want to avoid a vigorous secondary
screening at airport security. ‘The last thing I want to do is punish
citizens of a state who would love to have a REAL ID license but
can't get one,’ Chertoff said." But his regret didn’t keep
him from gloating about the chance to play God: REAL ID "is
a great teaching moment on the challenges of really reconfiguring
a society…"
Admit it, Baa
Baa: your democracy is a dictatorship. And the wolves are circling.
September
30, 2008
Becky
Akers [send her mail]
writes primarily about the American Revolution.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Becky
Akers Archives
|