Iraq
Veterans Speak Out
by
Kevin B. Zeese
by Kevin B. Zeese
Yvonne
Latty is the author of In
Conflict: Iraq War Veterans Speak Out on Duty, Loss and the Fight
to Stay Alive (Polipoint Press 2006) and the critically acclaimed
We
Were There: Voices of African American Veterans, from World War
II to the War in Iraq (Harper Collins/Amistad 2004). She
worked for the Philadelphia Daily News for 13 years where
she was an award winning reporter specializing in urban issues.
Latty was featured in the History Channel’s Documentary Honor Deferred
and has lectured nationally. Born and raised in New York City, she
earned a BFA in Film/Television and later an MA in Journalism from
New York University. She has taught journalism at Villanova
University and in the fall will be a Clinical Professor of Journalism
at New York University.
What
made you focus on soldiers who have served in Iraq? Did you
have any goal with this book?
The war in
Iraq is endless. I got tired of hearing from politicians, pundits,
the media and activists. I wanted to hear what was going on from
those closest to it the soldiers who served. About 1 millions
have served so far. They are the ones that sacrificed their lives.
They are the ones on the front lines not the rest of us and in my
opinion their voices have been silent. I wanted to write a book
that gave them a chance to speak out, to tell their truth about
the war and the aftermath on their lives. I wanted the book to be
bipartisan not to have a political agenda, but to be honest accounts
and have the readers come to their own conclusion about the war.
It was also a natural follow to my first book, "We Were There:
Voices of African American Veterans from WWII to the War In Iraq."
Both books are done in first person so the voice you hear is the
voice of the veteran.
A recent Zogby
poll showed that 72 percent of soldiers currently serving in Iraq
believe we should get out of Iraq within a year. Is that consistent
with your research? For those that what to get out of Iraq,
why? For those that think we should stay, why?
Many of the
vets I interviewed believe we should not be in Iraq, but there were
also many who did and were very proud of their service. Those who
want us out of Iraq believe the war was started on fraudulent purposes.
They don’t support the president and feel used. Those that support
the war believe they liberated a country that was in dire need of
liberation. They spoke of positive changes they saw while in Iraq.
Others spoke on how we messed things up during the initial invasion
by dismantling the Iraqi Army and police. They stressed how we need
to right it, not cut and bail and leave a very unstable country.
So they want us to stay until the Iraqi people have a strong police
force and is more stable.
The poll also
showed a lot of confusion as to why we are in Iraq. Forty-five
percent said they did not know why and over 80 percent of those
who thought they knew why said it was because of Saddam's role in
9/11 and Saddam's work with Al Qaeda. Is that kind of misinformation
and lack of understanding consistent with your research?
No. The vets
I interviewed knew that wasn’t the case. I interviewed a medic who
was still in Iraq, but the rest of my interviews were done with
soldiers who had already returned home. But those who served in
the beginning of the war believed at the time it was because of
9/11, weapons of mass destruction and Al-Qaeda, which is what many
Americans believed. Some of the veterans I interviewed want to hold
on to the idea that the war was a good thing for the Iraqis. You
have to understand that for those who serve, who risked their lives
and in some cases now suffer from PTSD, have lost limbs, or watch
their friends being blown up, it’s very hard for them to say all
that they went through, all that they suffered, was because of a
lie or misinformation. Many want to stay the course because
to say it was mistake is too horrible a thought for them to bear.
Those who serve in the military are trained to follow their leadership,
if they doubt or ask to many questions it would be very difficult
to maintain their focus on their mission. In war you can’t sit around
and have long talks with your comrades on what you think. That can
get you killed. For most it’s when they came home when the doubts
surface.
What lessons
do you take from this book?
That we as
a country are not doing enough for Iraq War veterans. That their
needs are lost in the shuffle of this endless debate. When they
come home their issues are ignored. We need to do more. Why does
Terry Schiavo’s case spend weeks on the front page when soldiers
blown to bits by IED’s merit three paragraphs in the middle of newspapers
and don’t even make the evening news? Why do so many say "bring
them home now" without thinking of how to support that homecoming?
Most Americans are not affected by the war and that’s obvious by
how it’s discussed, but we are at war. All you have to do is listen
to those who have served to get a glimpse of how hellish war is
and its aftermath. Whether you are for the war or against it the
veterans need your help and support. VA services are being
cut, vets are homeless, unemployed suffering from post-traumatic
stress. They need us to advocate for them. That is something we
can all do and see results.
The military
people you talked with seem as divided as Americans as unclear
as to the solution. How do you see your book helping to end
the occupation? Does it give you a clearer perspective on
Iraq? If so, what is your view?
I didn’t write
this book as an attempt to end the war. But I would challenge anyone
to spend time with the amputees at Walter Reed, like I did, and
say, "stay the course." I was there. I saw what a roadside bomb
could do to a young, strong body. I wrote In Conflict because
I wanted to give those Americans most affected by the war, those
who fight it, a chance to tell people in their own words what’s
going on in Iraq and how they feel about it. They are in conflict
just as we are here when we speak about the war. There are so many
different sides, opinions and agendas. I didn’t write the book as
platform for my theories about the war or how I think it can be
ended. I feel if you read the book you will get a clearer, more
realistic view of the war and it will become more than just a theory
or debate. Readers will feel a personal connection to the soldiers
and want to help those returning from Iraq. You see in the book
how the president’s policies affect those who serve, and what happens
when they return home is some of the poignant parts of the book.
I don’t like war and I look forward to the day when this war ends.
But if it ends and some vets have to continue to fight to get benefits
and jobs, then it’ll be just a different war that they will be fighting.
Why should
someone read your book?
These stories
need to be heard. These men and women represent just a slither of
the over 1 million that have served. Some are back on their third
tours. Although I profile 25, they represent the veterans of this
war. They are from all over the country. They range in age at time
of service from 19 to 54. They are white, black, Jewish, Latino,
Asian and of mixed race. One of the veterans is gay. They
range from majors to privates. They are all courageous men and women.
I want people to connect to them and this war, make it personal.
After reading In Conflict my goal is for readers to be moved
to reach out and support the veterans who are coming home. Whether
it’s to help one find a job or donate your time and efforts to in
helping veteran’s organizations, like the Wounded Warrior Project
that helps returning amputees.
May
23, 2006
Kevin
Zeese [send him mail]
is director of Democracy
Rising.
Copyright
2006 Kevin Zeese
Kevin
Zeese Archives
|