Things You're Not Supposed To Know About the South
by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
DIGG THIS
Clint Johnson,
The
Politically Incorrect Guide to the South (and Why It Will Rise Again)
(Washington, D.C.: Regnery, 2006).
From The
Simpsons, "Much Apu About Nothing," episode 151, May 5,
1996:
Citizenship
Test Administrator: What was the cause of the Civil War?
Apu:
Actually, there were numerous causes. Aside from the obvious schism
between abolitionists and anti-abolitionists, economic factors both
domestic and international….
Administrator:
(Interrupting) Hey, hey.
Apu:
Yeah?
Administrator:
Just say slavery.
Apu:
Slavery it is, sir.
Over the past
couple of years the Politically Incorrect Guide series has released
numerous successor volumes to my Politically
Incorrect Guide to American History, covering topics ranging
from English and American literature to climate change – the latter
subject treated in The
Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism),
the third New York Times bestseller in the series.
The beginning
of this year saw the release of still another entry in the series:
The Politically Incorrect Guide to the South, by Clint Johnson.
The professional haters and emotional hypochondriacs who pounce
on anyone with anything favorable to say about the South will have
a hard time digging up much dirt on Johnson, the respected author
of seven books on the misnamed Civil War, ranging from volumes on
the conduct of the war to guides for visiting Civil War sites today.
This enjoyable
and wide-ranging book is arranged into two parts. The first is a
quick introduction to Southern culture, including discussions of
manners, music, food, and pastimes, and a useful overview of historic
Southern homes, events, and locations. The second part is trip through
American history, from the colonial period through Reconstruction,
from a Southern point of view. This makes the book a valuable primer
– and an enjoyable, easy-to-read one at that – for friends who are
curious to know why you hold an interpretation of American history
that doesn’t exactly conform to what everyone was taught in fourth
grade.
As with Clyde
Wilson’s recent book, I am struck by a central point in The Politically
Incorrect Guide to the South: the demonization of all things
Southern, a recent phenomenon, would have struck most Americans
even half a century ago as grossly unfair, even bizarre. "If
you watch films from the golden era of Hollywood (and the golden
era of television)," Johnson writes, "you’ll find plenty
of sympathetic portrayals of Southerners and the Confederacy. Political
correctness – and the virtual banning and sometimes actual banning
of pro-South portrayals (like the disappearance of the classic Disney
film Song of the South) – didn’t happen until Hollywood decided
to focus on bad language, brutal violence, pornography, and liberal
preaching."
Johnson later
refers to an incident that occurred in December 1898, when President
William McKinley traveled to Atlanta to deliver a speech: "After
a rousing round of ‘Dixie,’ during which McKinley jumped up and
waved his hat, the president announced that ‘every soldier’s grave
during our unfortunate civil war is a tribute to American valor.
He then announced that the United States would take responsibility
for caring for more than four thousand Confederate graves scattered
around several national cemeteries in the North."
I mention this
incident not because I am particularly interested in the opinions
of politicians, but rather to show that there was a time in American
history when it was not considered completely crazy to honor the
sacrifices of Southerners who had fought to protect their homes
against invaders. And that, of course, was exactly what the typical
Southern soldier was doing: not defending slavery, but defending
his home and family.
This respect
for Southern valor continued even into the presidency of Theodore
Roosevelt, who loathed Jefferson Davis and the very idea of secession.
Nevertheless, in 1905 Roosevelt asked Congress to pass a law authorizing
the return of 440 Confederate battle flags in the possession of
the War Department. "We think it will be a graceful act of
the Congress to return these flags," he said. (That, of course,
was before we found out that those flags were something to be ashamed
of – and, in classic Jacobin, totalitarian style, to be systematically
expunged from the popular consciousness.)
In a speaking
tour of the Southern states, Roosevelt declared, "Only a heroic
people could have battled successfully against the conditions with
which the people of the South found themselves face to face at the
end of the Civil War." "All Americans," he later
said, "must ever show high honor to the men of the War Between
the States, whether they wore the blue or the gray, as long as they
did their duty as the light was given them to see their duty with
all the strength that was in them."
Now again,
the point is not that TR is an especially lovable fellow whose opinions
we are obliged to respect; my contribution to the book Reassessing
the Presidency makes my own appraisal of the man clear enough.
Rather, the point is that even TR, who – like the neoconservatives
and left-liberals who adore him – despised the Confederacy and its
blasphemous sundering of the sacred American Union, was able to
summon some kind words for the sacrifices made by men defending
their homes. Not for a moment did he think he was thereby defending
slavery.
Particularly
interesting is the example of Moses Jacob Ezekiel: born to a middle-class
Jewish family in Richmond in 1844, Ezekiel went on to become one
of the most sought-after sculptors in the world. As a young cadet
Ezekiel had fought at the Battle of New Market, Virginia, where
his roommate died; Ezekiel held his hand until the moment the young
man passed away.
When approached
by the design committee of the United Daughters of the Confederacy
to sculpt a Confederate monument, Ezekiel was delighted, waiving
his usual commission and offering to sculpt the monument for the
cost of materials. "I have been waiting for forty years to
have my love for the South recognized," he explained.
Ezekiel’s "Virginia
Mourning Her Dead" depicts the classical female figure from
the Virginia state seal sitting with her head in her hands, grieving
over the deaths of young Southern men at New Market. Ezekiel went
on to sculpt several other Confederate statues.
These
are the kinds of facts and anecdotes that can be found throughout
Johnson’s brisk narrative.
To
be sure, there were a few little things that grated on me here and
there; I don’t think it is particularly helpful to call the antiwar
Federalists of the War of 1812 "liberals," for example,
or to argue that their embrace of "isolationism" was obviously
something to be deplored. Still, The Politically Incorrect Guide
to the South is an excellent and welcome defense of all that
is good and valuable in the Southern tradition. Thomas Jefferson,
James Madison, George Mason, Patrick Henry, St. George Tucker, John
Taylor, John Randolph, Abel Upshur, and Spencer Roane, to mention
only the tip of the iceberg, constitute not exactly the most shameful
philosophical lineage in human history. When combined with the South’s
literary heritage – Poe, Twain, and Faulkner, for starters, are
not exactly to be sniffed at – and her contributions to countless
other aspects of American life and culture, the result is not, as
Johnson reminds us in this light-hearted and useful book, a package
to be ashamed of after all.
March
22, 2007
Thomas E. Woods, Jr. [view
his website;
send
him mail] is
senior fellow in American history at the Ludwig
von Mises Institute. His
books include How
the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization (get a free chapter
here),
The
Church and the Market: A Catholic Defense of the Free Economy
(first-place winner in the 2006
Templeton Enterprise Awards), and the New York Times
bestseller The
Politically Incorrect Guide to American History.
Copyright
© 2007 Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
Thomas
Woods Archives
|