The
Conqueror’s Shifting Ground
by
Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
Following
Iraq’s decision to allow an unconditional return of United Nations
weapons inspectors to that country, a rational person might have
acknowledged that such a humiliating capitulation represented at
least the slightest indication of progress toward satisfying U.S.
demands. The White House, however, immediately dismissed the offer,
declaring: "This is not a matter of inspections." Not
one inch was conceded – not that this was a welcome step forward,
not that it could be the beginning of a peaceful resolution to the
crisis, nothing.
For
reasons that Jude Wanniski and other observers have pointed out,
alleged "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq’s possession
or that country’s defiance of the United Nations cannot possibly
be the real reasons for the Bush administration’s belligerence toward
Iraq, which is why it is so amusing to read a neoconservative punditry
so at pains to defend these arguments. (Is any invasion of Israel
planned for having defied the United Nations for 35 years over its
occupations of the West Bank and Gaza?)
It
is obvious enough that nothing the Iraqi government could have said
would have satisfied the White House. Thus I have conjured up the
following scenario:
Wire
service, September 21, 2002:
"Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein today put on the table a still bolder proposal:
he will allow weapons inspectors from any country anywhere in the
world full access to any site in Iraq they wish to investigate,
and at Iraqi expense will be permitted to comb every inch of Iraqi
soil for evidence of illicit weapon construction.
"The
White House, however, is dismissing the offer as yet another example
of Iraqi stonewalling. ‘This isn’t about permitting inspection of
every inch of Iraqi soil on demand,’ a White House spokesman said.
‘This is about forcing Saddam Hussein to be forthcoming about his
weapons programs and to come clean before the international community.’"
Wire
service, September 26, 2002:
"Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein put an additional offer on the table today:
he will, again at Iraqi expense, authorize the deployment of a series
of surveillance satellites to be used by the United States and any
country that is interested, to keep constant watch over any Iraqi
installation the international community indicates. Surveillance
aircraft will also be permitted free access to the skies of Iraq,
so that the development of any potentially illicit weapons may be
monitored and prevented.
"‘This
isn’t about forcing Saddam Hussein to be forthcoming about his weapons
programs,’ said National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. ‘It
is about transforming an irresponsible and despotic regime into
one that will obey the will of the international community and the
mandate of the United Nations.’"
Wire
service, October 7, 2002:
"Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein, faced with overwhelming American intransigence,
is now offering to establish a coalition government consisting of
himself and officials from neutral countries designated by the United
Nations. Diplomatic historians and political scientists around the
world were unanimous in declaring such a move by Hussein to be absolutely
without precedent in the history of international affairs.
"The
White House, however, remained unimpressed. ‘This isn’t about transforming
Saddam’s regime into one that will obey the United Nations,’ a White
House source said. ‘It’s about ensuring that Iraq will be absolutely
unable to threaten its neighbors or even the United States with
weapons of mass destruction.’"
Wire
service, October 14, 2002:
"Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein made today what he says is his final offer.
For the next three months, he says, every Iraqi citizen will lie
prostrate on the ground and will remain motionless, with the exception
of three meal allowances, which will be administered by UN personnel
at Iraqi expense. Otherwise the entire Iraqi population will remain
absolutely still for a full three months while UN officials take
any action they consider reasonable or necessary to ensure that
Iraq is not a danger to her neighbors.
"When
asked for his opinion of this most recent Iraqi proposal, Press
Secretary Ari Fleischer told reporters that the President was skeptical.
‘Saddam must be forthcoming and cooperative, and his persistent
stonewalling and defiance are only trying the patience of the international
community,’ Fleischer said. ‘The President has made his position
very clear. The peace of the world, from New Zealand to Canada,
is menaced as long as Saddam is alive.’"
Wire
service, October 15, 2002:
"In
a surprise move today, Iraqi President Saddam Hussein stepped up
his diplomatic offensive, and said he would in fact commit suicide
on live television if that was what it would take to forestall an
invasion of his country. Physicians approved by the United Nations
would perform all the necessary tests to verify his identity before
bringing about his death by lethal injection.
"Asked
for comment today, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld replied
that he was growing tired of Saddam’s lack of cooperation and reminded
Americans that ‘this has never been about just one man.’"
September
18, 2002
Copyright
2002 by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
Professor
Thomas E. Woods, Jr. [send
him mail] holds a AB from Harvard and a PhD from Columbia.
He teaches history, is associate editor of The Latin Mass Magazine,
and is co-author (with Christopher A. Ferrara) of The Great Façade:
Vatican II and the Regime of Novelty in the Roman Catholic Church
(2002). The book (as well as a sample chapter) is available at greatfacade.com.
Thomas
Woods Archives
|