Vampires, Money, and Economic Cycles
by
Bill Walker
by Bill Walker
DIGG THIS
Jesús
Huerta de Soto has written the ultimate vampire book. He tracks
these bloodsucking monsters from the first documentary records in
ancient times to the modern apologia for their maintenance at public
expense. At last, there is a single book that scientifically explains
the origin of vampirism, the magnitude of their drain on society,
and proposes a systematic plan for their humane extermination.
De Soto starts
out by driving a stake through the heart of the pro-vampire argument:
that somehow vampires have legal rights. He goes through old legal
arguments and shows that the right of a person to keep their own
blood was established in Roman times. Also, he demonstrates that
the concept of "fractional-reserve blood banking" violates
all logically derived legal codes. Two people cannot both own and
use the same hemoglobin molecules in different bloodstreams at the
same time.
That’s silly,
you say? No one would ever try to establish a system where two or
more people owned the same property at the same time? That’s generally
true, except where vampires are involved. Now, if you look at the
grain industry, the elevator operators don’t try to loan out ten
times more grain than they actually have in their bins. The same
principles apply in the blood industry; if you make an autologous
blood deposit for an operation, they won’t loan your blood to ten
different vampires so that it’s gone by the time your operation
comes around. But that’s because vampires don’t control the blood
storage industry; they control the banking industry.
In Chapter
Two, de Soto traces the history of the vampire bank, back into Greek
and Roman times. Archaeologists have laboriously dug up the dusty
records of many ancient banks. The records have a unifying feature:
the banks, from whatever century, were fractional-reserve frauds,
and every single one eventually defaulted. And the histories of
Athens, Ptolemaic Alexandria, and Rome indeed show the effects of
monetary expansion and contraction.
The author
points out that one overriding factor pushes bankers into fraud.
Of course there is always the desire for short-term gain, but that
would generally be overcome by the desire for good reputation and
long-term business. The deciding factor is the threat of confiscation
by government. Banks with actual precious metal in their vaults
were more tempting targets for gangsters like Alexander, Caesar,
Herod, Cleopatra, etc. than "banks" which had loaned out
their reserves a couple of times over. Fractional-reserve banks
offered an opportunity for cooperation with the gangsters, in the
form of armed force against depositors who wanted their money back.
The history
lesson continues into the late Middle Ages, where we are shocked,
shocked to find that the Medici banks were not completely honest.
So dishonest were the Italian banks that they caused a decade-spanning
economic collapse right before the Black Death.
Then in a bizarre
twist we have to suffer through the story of the Bank of Amsterdam
and a 150-year period of perfect banking honesty. No panics, no
cheating, no economic cycles, just steady economic progress through
revolutions, wars, and disasters of every kind. (Don’t worry, it’s
the only known example of such length).
Chapters 38
could be called "You can’t eat your cake and have it too."
You may think a long theoretical explanation of this unnecessary…
but go ask your brother-in-law how banks work. He will loudly explain,
using his thousands of hours of instruction from TV and the business
pages, that the "money multiplier effect" creates prosperity,
prevents Depressions, and slices our cake for us. He will also be
asking you for large "loans" during the upcoming recession.
Let me try to summarize the important points that he needs to know
now (while you inform him in advance that you will be making no
fractional-reserve loans):
What Your
Brother-In-Law Should Know About Fractional-Reserve Banking:
- The economic
damage is done during the inflation. Not the recession, the inflation.
It’s the inflation, stupid.
Politicians
and central-bank bureaucrats like to pretend that only deflation
is the bad guy; poor ol’ inflation is totally innocent, even beneficial.
They claim to be "experts" at "keeping the boom going,"
"keeping the economy from overcooling," etc. etc. However,
if you look at the flow of real resources, it is easy to see that
printing more money doesn’t create more oil, silicon, etc. The economic
damage is done the instant the first dollar of freshly printed cash
lands in the bank vault and is loaned out to ten different businessmen.
The ten newly optimistic entrepreneurs immediately run out and buy
things. Now they have those things, and you don’t.
Then the damage
is made worse. Not only do they reduce your access to real resources,
but the overoptimistic dot-commers (e.g.) now organize those resources
for a fantasy economy; an economy much bigger and richer than the
real one. This causes them to buy more and different capital equipment
than the actual economy wants. Eventually they are all set up to
produce products that aren’t in demand, and find that people don’t
buy their products. This is called "recession," and is
actually the time when the economy repairs itself. The repair process
involves devaluation of the misinvested capital resources, and unemployment
(which is a devaluation of misinvested human resources).
- (There
is no "2." It’s the inflation, stupid.)
BTW, this is
where we are today. The Fed has printed piles of money during the
Clinton-Bush years. The capital structure contains piles of misinvestments.
Now, either there has to be a reduction in inflation, and a recession
while we reorganize our resources to produce for the consumers that
actually exist. Or the Fed can just keep increasing the rate of
the presses and print us into a hyperinflation, like Weimar Germany
or Chiang
Kai-Shek’s China. If they can’t find businessmen to borrow and
malinvest, they can always find politicians ready to launch expensive
WMD searches… at least until we run out of nations that don’t have
WMDs.
The last chapter
of Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles points out that we don’t
have to live like this. We don’t let grain elevators lend out ten
times more grain than they have, then back them up with tax-supported
bailouts. We don’t let vampires run the blood banks. If we didn’t
let vampires run the money supply, then systematic malinvestment
and recession would be a thing of the past. The cost of wars would
be harder to conceal as well. No wonder vampires like fractional-reserve
banks.
The
book is free online, an anti-vampire service of Mises.org.
February
19, 2007
Bill
Walker [send him mail]
works in HIV and gene therapy research in Rochester, Minnesota.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Bill
Walker: Archives
|