Gott
Mit Uns
by
Laurence
M. Vance
by Laurence M. Vance
"Religion
is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless
world and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the
people" (Karl Marx Critique
of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right).
Marx
was right.
This
admission may sound strange coming from someone who is both a conservative
Christian and an unabashed advocate of laissez faire, but what Marx
said about religion being a drug is nevertheless correct. He may
never have said anything else in his entire life that was true or
worth reading, and
probably didn’t, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
It
goes without saying that people high on drugs do not act normal.
They may think, say, and do strange things that they would not normally
do. They may even do some wild and crazy things that they would
never dream of doing when they were not high.
Many
supporters of the senseless war in Iraq are high on religion. Add
a religious element to a war and the faithful will come out in droves
in support of it. In the case of the current war in Iraq this is
easy to do. Because the United States is supposedly a "Christian
nation," the war can be turned into a modern-day crusade since
Iraq is a "Muslim nation."
The
use of religion in war is as old as history itself. If there is
one thing that men are willing to fight and die for it is their
religious beliefs. But unfortunately, it is also historically true
that many are willing to kill or justify killing under the guise
of religion.
This
is especially disheartening of those who would defend aggression
in the name of Christianity. As the Baptist minister who called
himself Veritatis Amans lamented in the pages of The Christian
Review back in 1847:
War
has ever been the scourge of the human race. The history of
the past is little else than a chronicle of deadly feuds, irreconcilable
hate, and exterminating warfare. The extension of empire, the
love of glory, and thirst for fame, have been more fatal to
men than famine or pestilence, or the fiercest elements of nature.
The trappings and tinsel of war, martial prowess, and military
heroism, have, in all ages, been venerated and lauded to the
skies. And what is more sad and painful, many of the wars whose
desolating surges have deluged the earth, have been carried
on in the name and under the sanction of those who profess the
name of Christ.
The
last time the United States experienced such religious intensity
during a war was back during the misnamed
conflict commonly called the Civil War. The blasphemous "Battle
Hymn of the Republic" is still sung today in many northern
churches around the fourth of July and Veterans Day.
American
preachers were used during World War I to keep war fever high. Here
is a typical example: "It is God who has summoned us to this
war. It is his war we are fighting…. This crusade is indeed a crusade.
The greatest in history the holiest … a Holy War. Yes, it
is Christ, the King of Righteousness, who calls us to grapple in
deadly strife with this unholy and blasphemous power" (Randolph
McKim, For God and Country or the Christian Pulpit in War Time,
1918). For more on religion during World War I and the Progressive
Era see Richard Gamble’s The
War for Righteousness: Progressive Christianity, the Great War,
and the Rise of the Messianic Nation.
President
Bush has mastered the art of using religious rhetoric to capture
the support of gullible evangelical Christians. Even while the federal
debt
and deficit
skyrocket, the body count
in Iraq continues to rise, and he makes war
on the bill of rights, Bush has continued to maintain that he
is a man of faith who is doing the will of the Lord. And so have
others: see Stephen Mansfield’s The
Faith of George Bush and David Aikman’s A
Man Of Faith: The Spiritual Journey of George W. Bush. Christian
"leaders" like Pat Robertson, Ralph Reed, James Dobson,
Donald Wildmon, Tim LaHaye, D. James Kennedy, John Hagee, and Jerry
Falwell are some of the most vocal apologists for Bush and the Republican
Party. Even that great paragon of virtue, Rudolph Giuliani, has
gotten on the religious bandwagon, recently
saying that "there was some divine guidance in the President
being elected."
It
is no overstatement to say that many of these so-called Christian
leaders consider George Bush to be God’s gift to the human race.
Jerry Falwell, who, in the wake of the elections, has resurrected
his Moral Majority organization,
said his group would capitalize on the momentum of the elections
"to maintain an evangelical revolution of voters who will continue
to go the polls to ‘vote Christian.’" Said Falwell: "On
election night, I actually shed tears of joy as I saw the fruit
of a quarter century of hard work. Nearly 116 million Americans
voted. More than 30 million were evangelical Christians who, according
to the pollsters, voted their moral convictions. I proudly say .
. . they voted Christian!!" Although Bush fails on all three
counts, Falwell has actually called him a "socially,
fiscally, and politically conservative president." When
it comes to the subject of politics, Christian leaders and their
followers are a perfect example of the blind leading the blind (Matthew
15:14).
There
is another regime in recent history that used religious rhetoric
in wartime. Soldiers in the German Wehrmacht wore belt buckles inscribed
with Gott Mit Uns (God is with us). Now, I am not in any
way comparing the United States to Nazi Germany or George Bush to
Adolph Hitler. However, there are an abundance of Bush/Hitler comparisons
out there, most perhaps written by "any Democrat-but-Bush"
leftists, but some that are at least worth reading like the
one that was linked
to on LRC, and a recent
one that raises some good points. Anyway, there really is no
comparison between the two "leaders," for as has been
pointed out, Bush is not the orator
that Hitler was, and he doesn’t promote the production of small,
cheap cars.
But
in all seriousness, there are two passages in Hitler’s Mein Kampf,
which was published in two volumes in 19251926, and which
can be read today in print
or online,
that are uncanny.
In
volume I, at the end of chapter 2, the Führer said: "Hence
today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of
the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am
fighting for the work of the Lord." Substitute "Muslim"
or "terrorists" for "Jew" and this sounds like
George Bush. According
to Bob Woodward’s book Plan
of Attack, Bush prayed as he walked outside the Oval Office
after giving the order to begin the attack on Iraq: "Going
into this period, I was praying for strength to do the Lord’s will.
. . . I'm surely not going to justify war based upon God. Understand
that. Nevertheless, in my case I pray that I be as good a messenger
of His will as possible."
In
chapter 13 of volume 2, Hitler mentions the German people asking
God to bless their troops:
Each
point of that Treaty [of Versailles] could have been engraved
on the minds and hearts of the German people and burned into
them until sixty million men and women would find their souls
aflame with a feeling of rage and shame; and a torrent of fire
would burst forth as from a furnace, and one common will would
be forged from it, like a sword of steel. Then the people would
join in the common cry: "To arms again!"
Then,
from the child’s story-book to the last newspaper in the country,
and every theatre and cinema, every pillar where placards are
posted and every free space on the hoardings should be utilized
in the service of this one great mission, until the faint-hearted
cry, "Lord, deliver us," which our patriotic associations
send up to Heaven today would be transformed into an ardent
prayer: "Almighty God, bless our arms when the hour comes.
Be just, as Thou hast always been just. Judge now if we deserve
our freedom. Lord, bless our struggle."
For
an unpretentious war prayer that no Christian "leader"
would dare to pray see Mark Twain’s "The
War Prayer."
In
fairness to Bush, the "Gott Mit Uns" belt buckle was not
just used by Germany in World War II it was also worn by
German soldiers in World War I. But contrast this with the supposedly
"Christian" United States, where, as defense consultant
Josh Pollack, in his "Saudi
Arabia and the United States, 1931–2002," has documented,
Air Force chaplains were forbidden to wear Christian insignia or
hold formal services during the early decades of the American troop
presence in Saudi Arabia. It is also true that during the first
war in Iraq, the importation of Bibles for Christian troops was
discouraged, and no alcohol was permitted to U.S. troops in accordance
with Islamic Law.
The
lesson here is clear: The state uses religion for its own sinister
purposes, and especially for that most destructive purpose of all
what Jefferson called "the greatest scourge of mankind"
and Washington called "the plague of mankind" war.
But if war is so destructive then why does the state engage in it?
As Randolph Bourne (18861918)
so succinctly stated: "War
is the health of the State."
December
20, 2004
Laurence
M. Vance [send him mail]
is a freelance writer and an adjunct instructor in accounting and
economics at Pensacola Junior College in Pensacola, FL. His new
book is Christianity
and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State. Visit
his website.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
Laurence
M. Vance Archives
|