The Spam
Problem: Solved
by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
by Jeffrey A. Tucker
For
a few months now I've been sending out emails that resulted in a
reply message from Spamarrest
requesting that I type in a small password before the message is
delivered. Easy enough. I would then receive a notice that I would
not need to do this again, because now I am in the recipient’s approved
email box. It was one extra step, a bit strange, but no big deal.
It seem a bit extreme to me. I hadn't had much of a spam problem
myself.
Until
this week. I've faced a sudden explosion of it. Spam is becoming
ever more sophisticated, with real-sounding names and intriguing
subject lines. It is ever more difficult to recognize. Mostly it
is just a deleteable nuisance, but some of it contains porn and
much of it is just horrifyingly tacky.
With
new worms and viruses coming out every day, spam has become actively
dangerous. Anti-virus programs are wonderful but even with auto-update
there is always a few hours of time that passes between the unleashing
of the worm and the delivery of the fix. The attempted delivery
of 30 or so worm-carrying spams yesterday convinced me that I had
to act.
A
new survey shows that one is every two emails is spam. It is
seriously compromising the entire email system, causing people to
dread going to their in-boxes. Others change names to avoid it.
Of
course the state has seen the main chance. The menace of spam has
prompted calls for anti-spam
legislation. Politicians are calling for a national "do
not spam" registry proof that they know nothing of the industry
or technology in question. Another suggestion demands
prison terms for bulk emailers! The existence of spam itself
has become the most useful stick out there with which to beat up
on the new technology.
What
do to? If the market rules, the way follows the will. It was just
a matter of time. And now, thanks to the miracle of private solutions,
the spam problem does not need to exist at all. The solution is
in one word: Spamarrest.
Glory be to private solutions! The result is far better than I imagined.
Conventional
spam filters can only do so much. And I tried Earthlink's system
and found myself in some sort of bog. Yes, maybe I clicked the wrong
button but long experience tells me that if a piece of software
isn't intuitive, it is probably not worth having and that there
is probably something better out there.
Spamarrest,
a quick download, works by serving as a buffer email server. It
receives your email and evaluates its source. A new sender is notified
that you are using this, and he or she must take the extra step
of entering a code a very quick process. But it is one that automated
spammers do not and cannot take. Thus does it immediately end all
spam. The problem just vanishes in an instant.
You
can then go to the Spamarrest site and examine the unverified email.
The ones you hate can be blocked, and the spammer receives a rejected
notice back. This is something that regular email cannot do. Outlook
Express says it "blocks" but it merely throws the email in the delete
can. So not only can you block spam with Spamarrest, you can give
the spammer a little punch in the chops.
As
for anyone in your Spamarrest address book, they immediately get
through. You can upload your own address book from your email program
if you want to, using an easy interface. New senders take that extra
step of entering a code not much to ask if someone is trying to
contact you.
One
major issue that had worried me concerned automated emails that
are not spam. For example, everyone receives auto-email from Amazon,
or someone else with whom you like to do business. What about services
to which you subscribed like LRC
and Mises.org? How
are these to be delivered? Are these going to be zapped like spam?
Spamarrest
has that problem solved. With an easy interface, you can examine
all attempted email deliveries. If there is one you want, you check
deliver and it puts it in your address book. It will arrive normally
from then on. If it is one you don't want, you can block it or do
nothing. This completely solves the problem.
The
whole program is simple and slyly ingenious for that reason. But
my main point here is not to advertise Spamarrest something even
better could come along--but to highlight how the market has solved
a major problem, and made it available for anyone who wants the
problem solved. And it took place in the midst of political hysteria.
The politicians and regulations prattle and fret, even as the market
is busy solving problems even a problem that very recently seem
insoluble.
Spam
doesn't have to be a problem anymore. The brilliance of private
enterprise has solved it for now. The only remaining problem is
the political establishment that would use it as an excuse to regulate
by force this medium that produces solutions precisely because it
is so unregulated. If the market can so beautifully solve the problem
of spam, is there anything it can't do if it is permitted?
August
21, 2003
Jeffrey
Tucker [send him mail]
is editorial vice president of www.Mises.org.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Jeffrey
Tucker Archives
|