Who
Cares About Your DNA?
by
Tricia
Shore
by Tricia Shore
DIGG THIS
When the elite
want something, they are not above cheating their way to it. We
see this example easily with mainstream media’s blackout of Ron
Paul and Mike Gravel as presidential candidates, despite the candidates’
novel ideas. Candidates not elite-anointed are dismissed as crackpots
and ignored by the Los Angeles Times and other mainstream
propaganda outlets because they do not further the elite’s plans,
which include tracking and surveillance that closely emulate plans
laid out by Aldous Huxley and George Orwell.
One sneaky
way that the elite obtain their goals is to use a voice vote, which
is what recently happened with H.R. 3825, a giant step toward the
Brave New World that Huxley described. H.R. 3825 and S. 1858, soon
to be rubber-stamped by King Jorge unless there is a massive protest
along with a miracle, gives the federal government authority over
every newborn’s DNA, without parental consent. Not only the
average Oprah and Dr. Phil watcher, but many alert citizens are
also unaware of this horrid legislation, which will make any newborn’s
DNA government property. This massive intrusion into privacy and
family will be funded by yet another massive federally-funded program,
paid for by the money that the government forces from you.
I find it especially
interesting, when considered along with this recent Orwellianly-named
"Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act" that in the government’s
latest attempt to separate families en masse, government social
wreckers are forcing over 400 children to have
their DNA tested:
More than
400 children taken from a polygamous sect's ranch will undergo
DNA testing this week, an attempt to determine who their parents
are and if any sexual abuse took place.
Officials
plan to begin taking DNA samples Monday at the coliseum in San
Angelo where the children are being housed, but may need three
or four days to complete the job.
The fact that
this horrid invasion of privacy is being done, even to children
who are still breastfeeding, without parental consent and without
an established accuser or proof of any abuse, tells me that there
are far too many people hooked on mainstream media. Otherwise, there
would be blood in the Texas streets. Just 100 years ago, an alert
citizenry would have protested the taking of these children and
their DNA by showing some social wreckers what the end of a gun
barrel looks like.
In post-Constitutional
America, however, where habeas corpus, that long-standing
idea that we’ve had around for a few centuries, has gone the way
of the dinosaur, people are okay with taking children from mothers
and forcing these children, many of whom are not even old enough
to say no, to give the government their DNA.
"A
Critical Analysis of the Implications for Genetic Privacy and Consent
Rights in Congress’ Proposed ‘Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act
of 2007’" states how the government plans to treat the
DNA of every newborn, even those whose parents are completely aligned
with the mainstream:
- Establish
a national list of genetic conditions for which newborns and children
are to be tested.
- Establish
protocols for the linking and sharing of genetic test results
nationwide.
- Build surveillance
systems for tracking the health status and health outcomes of
individuals diagnosed at birth with a genetic defect or trait.
- Use the
newborn screening program as an opportunity for government agencies
to identify, list, and study "secondary conditions"
of individuals and their families.
- Subject
citizens to genetic research without their knowledge or consent.
Since my firstborn’s
birth over seven years ago, I have read a lot about our government’s
roots of freedom and a truly free market and I have acquired great
disdain for our current government and mainstream media; I wish
that were not the case. However, a country focused on the false
choices of Hillary, Obama, and John, as if there’s a dash of difference
among the three, does not protest a bill that claims to save lives
of newborns. Nor do these people care much about taking DNA from
innocent children who’ve been separated from their parents, with
no accuser identified and no solid evidence of abuse. I realize
that I’ve mentioned the last part of that sentence previously, but
it’s important enough to state twice: The Constitution states that
we have the right to face our accuser, an impossible thing
to do when there is not one.
That’s the
way that things work, however, in post-Constitutional America,
where a King that seems to be elected by the people rules through
Executive Orders and the elite have their way, whether rushing legislation
through, as with the Patriot Act, or taking an underhanded voice
vote, in which legislators are not forced to take responsibility
for their vote.
| |
 |
| |
Photo
Credit: Mr. Comic Mom
|
| |
|
Unfortunately,
most people are too concerned with the junk food that mainstream
media are feeding us to worry much about the database that the government
is building, using their descendants’ blood. The United States’
forefathers expected us to be an intelligent, literate folk. But
the literacy rate was much higher two hundred years ago than it
is now, proving what a wonderful job that the government schools
have done. People don’t much read anymore and they certainly don’t
care. In the near future, the elite will pass legislation that requires
microchipping of every newborn and Oprah will say how wonderful
it is and there will be some kind of "saving lives" rhetoric
added to the bill and people will think that microchipping is fabulous.
Despite the
massive power that the elite pretend to have, in reality, we have
only ourselves to blame.
April
24, 2008
Tricia
Shore [send her mail],
Comic Mom, is the breastfeeding, homeschooling, thinking
mama of three sons and the wife of their dad, Mr. Comic
Mom. Currently living in Los Angeles, where she has recently become
hip enough to be on MySpace,
she misses the sweet tea and barbecue of North Carolina.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Tricia
Shore Archives
|