I am striving
. . . to discover whether man still has a place in this tangle;
whether he still has any authority among these colossal masses
in movement; whether he still can exert any force whatever on
the statistics which are slipping from his hands into the abstract
and the unreal. Can he have a place, authority, and possibility
of action on a better basis than ill-founded declarations of hope
or blind acts of unreasonable faith?
~ Jacques
Ellul
A friend
of ours has observed that one of the consequences of having children
and grandchildren is that "they give you more people to worry
about." As both a father and grandfather, her observation
is correct. I have long been of the view that a parent has a moral
obligation not to allow his or her children to live under tyranny.
My adult life has been preoccupied with this duty but, while I
believe my efforts have produced some marginal benefits, Leviathan
still reaches out to devour all within its grasp. My continuing
focus on this danger has, at least, helped my daughters – and
hopefully, in time, my grandchildren – to develop an awareness
of the threat to their well-being posed by political systems and
the uncertainties that lie before them.
It is interesting
– albeit not pleasant – to witness the collapse of Western civilization.
A vibrant system that once was productive of the material and
intangible values supportive of human well-being, has reached
a terminal state. Civilizing principles and practices that found
sufficient – albeit inconstant – expression in Western societies,
have deteriorated into an acceptance of corruption – provided
it is carried out in high places – and the celebration of violence
– provided it is directed against plausible categories of wrongdoers.
In such ways has the multi-trillion dollar looting of taxpayers
on behalf of an entrenched corporate-state plutocracy combined
with the ongoing conduct of endless wars against endless enemies
to send a morally, intellectually, and economically bankrupt culture
to an awaiting black hole.
As I watched
politicians, members of the mainstream media, and selected academicians
discuss the self-styled "stimulus" plan designed to
confer trillions of dollars to the establishment’s favored institutions,
I found myself recalling those early days following the Bush administration’s
bombing of Baghdad, with thieves engaged in the wholesale looting
of artifacts from the National Museum of Iraq. How fitting that
Americans, with their insistence upon procedural due process,
should content themselves with watching Congress carry out such
pillaging on C-SPAN, with the regularities of Roberts Rules
of Order being faithfully observed.
The desperation
with which presidents Bush and Obama urged this grand-scale despoliation
was breathtaking, with Mr. Bush going so far as to threaten a
declaration of martial law should Congress not accede to his plan.
Even the terminology underwent a rapid transformation: what began
as a "bailout" quickly took on a bad name, and was changed
to "stimulus." But who or what was to be "stimulated"
remained open to question. The more uncertainty that underlay
this program, the more Boobus suspected something untoward. In
an effort to allay such fears, Mr. Obama spoke in the haziest
of words about some "plan" being put together to save
America from the effects of Newton’s third law of motion. After
all, if Ozymandias is to have credibility among the dupable, its
wizards must appear to be capable of designing and carrying out
effective "plans." That the "plans" under
consideration are but photocopies of the previous programs that
created our present difficulties, is to be overlooked. The study
of economics or history might inform Boobus of the vicious circle
within which he is ensnared. But Mr. Obama has cautioned against
listening to "ideologies," or focusing upon the past!
To characterize
this so-called "stimulus" as a plan that can rectify
decades of programs and policies against which free-market advocates
had long warned, is to corrupt the rational and informed nature
of intelligent planning. At best, the supporters of this program
have offered little more than a hodge-podge of guess-work that
boils down to "let’s try this and see if it works."
Neither is the undertaking an "investment" on behalf
of taxpayers, as politicians insist on characterizing it. I recently
saw a figure that the total cost of the many "bailout"
packages given to corporate interests, totals some $9,700,000,000,000.
If my math is correct, this so-called "investment" comes
out to almost $33,000 per American. Do you expect to receive any
dividend checks from these corporations, or be allowed to attend
annual stockholder meetings to vote on new management?
There
is no doubt that the corporate recipients of this booty are "stimulated"
to get as much money as they can. But even the stumbling and bumbling
uncertainty as to how the program will work, what criteria will
be employed to determine recipients, or how the money will be
used, illustrates that this program is not so much a rationally-based
plan, as it is a scheme. Any pretense of this being
a carefully calculated solution to a ubiquitous problem clouds
its sordid reality: a last-ditch effort on the part of institutional
interests to ransack the governmental treasury before the entire
system collapses. The prognosis for a restoration of the economic
health of the country resulting from it is no better than your
submitting to brain surgery at the hands of a college freshman
who has just received a B+ in a first-year biology course!
This "plan"
– like the wars whose costs have so greatly contributed to our
economic woes – is but another expression of the moral, intellectual,
and economic bankruptcies that are destroying Western civilization.
A productive, free, and peaceful society cannot be held together
by violence, surveillance, torture, SWAT teams, lies, and prisons.
Neither can it countenance governmental policies of plundering
the fruits of the labors of an entire population, and redistributing
it to the institutional friends of those in power.
I
apologize to my children and grandchildren for failing in my moral
duty to protect you from the ravages of tyranny. I shall continue
in my efforts, of course, recognizing that only peaceful methods
can produce a peaceful world. In the meantime, I offer you this
advice: (1) never believe anything the government tells you; (2)
never believe anything the mainstream media tells you; (3) pay
attention to – but be skeptical of – those whose ideas do not
conform to consensus-based definitions of reality; (4) master
the art of contrary thinking, and learn to stay away from herds
as well as from those who insist upon herding others into destructive,
lemming-like stampedes; (5) do not put your trust in those who
offer you "hope," but seek out those who will help you
develop understanding; (6) be prepared – as were your ancestors
– to move to new frontiers that are better suited to both your
liberty and material well-being; (7) find, support, protect, and
defend like-minded friends, being mindful of the shared origins
of the words "peace," "freedom," "love,"
and "friend;" (8) avoid being drawn into the black hole
to which our civilization is destined; whose vacuuming force is
made possible by the collective energies of your neighbors; and,
(9) mindful of all the above, avoid all sense of despair by combining
your intelligence and emotions to help in the creation of a new
civilization grounded in peace, liberty, and respect for the inviolability
of the individual.