The late
1950s and early 1960s were the formative years for what has since
become known as “libertarian thinking.” Those of us who rejected
the state, and collectivism in general, were as rare throughout
America then as they are today in the District of Columbia. Murray
Rothbard was fond of saying that, in those early days, all libertarians
would fit inside his New York City apartment. There was more realism
than humor in his remark. It was not uncommon for someone to say
to another something like: “I’m going on a business trip to Cincinnati,”
and to have the other person respond with: “be sure to look up
Wally Ballew: he’s a libertarian.” “We have a libertarian in Cincinnati?
That’s great!” It was a time when most libertarians knew one another
either personally or by reputation.
These were
the days when many were engaged in serious introspection and self-questioning.
Atlas
Shrugged was a beginning point for a lot of us. As the
title of Jerome Tuccille’s classic work accurately observed, the
process “usually starts with Ayn Rand.” For those seeking a deeper
understanding of liberty – instead of just a new religion – the
quest took numerous paths. For some, there was a focus on “what
shall we call ourselves?,” as though a label conferred genuine
insight. “Individualists,” “anarchists,” “autarchists,” “laissez-faire
capitalists,” “Objectivists,” “libertarians,” and, later, “anarcho-capitalists,”
were some of the more common labels thrown out for consideration.
My late friend, Jim Martin, even suggested “me-ist” for consideration.
It was during
these intellectually and politically turbulent years that I met
Sy Leon. He and I were teaching at Robert LeFevre’s Rampart College
in Colorado, one of a number of organizations devoted to broadening
an understanding of individual liberty. LeFevre had been successful
in getting men and women in all age groups to pay to spend one
to two weeks in Colorado studying the philosophy of freedom. Such
an effort took a great commitment of both time and energy from
our students, an effort one finds, today, at Mises University
in Auburn, Alabama.
Sy and I,
along with his wife Riqui and my wife Jane, thus found ourselves
at one of the centers where libertarian thinking was being explored.
Others who taught at Rampart at the time included the economist
Bill Hutt, historian Jim Martin, and a gangly teenager by the
name of Roy Childs. Others who came there to share their ideas
included Ludwig von Mises, F.A. Harper, Frank Chodorov, Rose Wilder
Lane, Bruno Leoni, Leonard Read, Gordon Tullock, and Milton Friedman.
It was a vibrant place within which to develop one’s thinking.
Sy’s sense
of humor made him an effective teacher. So had his World War II
experiences as a B-17 bombardier. Unlike far too many veterans
of war, Sy saw the immorality and fundamental indecency of warfare
and refused to gratify his ego with lies about its noble character.
A talk he gave at Rampart College was one of the most moving condemnations
of war and the state that I have ever heard.
He
was also adept at promoting the cause of liberty to wider audiences.
He formed an organization, “The League of Non-Voters,” to critique
the voting process as an illusion by which we are led to believe
that we are controlling the political system. His ideas resulted
in a book that received a good deal of attention: None
of the Above. Through the League, he actively promoted
the inclusion of “none of the above” as an alternative to listed
candidates for every office. While his ideas have led a few states
to include such an option as a non-binding statement – particularly
in primary elections – Sy had a far more powerful thought in mind.
If “none of the above” received the majority of votes for any
office, that position would remain unfilled until a candidate
more suitable to the electorate could be found.
Sy ran Rampart
College after it moved to southern California; organized speaking
tours for Harry Browne thus helping to stimulate Harry’s marketplace
popularity; organized a number of libertarian programs; and was
a frequent interviewee in the media. A few years before we met
Sy, Jane and I traveled to Chicago to hear a talk given by Ayn
Rand, a program we later found Sy had organized. He was a promoter
in the healthy sense of the word; someone who worked effectively
to accomplish worthwhile projects.
No matter
how many friends you have, there is that small handful of very
special people with whom you share an unmatched closeness. For
Jane and me, Sy and Riqui were among such people. The four of
us shared a common passion for Dixieland jazz, and often found
ourselves driving from Rampart College to Denver on weekends to
hear the Queen City Jazz Band. The Leons were also the ones who,
a few years later, introduced us to the work of J. Krishnamurti,
a philosopher who had the most significant influence on my thinking
in the latter half of my life, and whose talks we listened to
in Ojai, California, when he spoke there each spring. Krishnamurti
reminded us that it is “the movement of thought” that underlies
all of the conflict we have within our own lives and with others.
It is introspection – the same process of self-examination
that brought us to libertarian thinking in those early days –
which, alone, can extricate us from the structured insanities
that our minds have created.
Riqui died
a few years ago. Shortly thereafter, Jane and I lost contact with
Sy. Efforts to locate him proved futile. A few weeks ago, I learned
that he had fallen ill, and didn’t want others to know of his
condition. He died this past spring.
It
is fitting that our acquaintance with Sy should end in the same
state of mind in which it had begun: through an exploration of
our own minds and behavior to discover why we persist in following
our self-destructive conditioning. There was a sign that overhung
a road at Rampart College, with a message penned by the late F.A.
Harper: “the man who knows what freedom means, will find a way
to be free.” I know that such words were of great significance
to Sy.
The
libertarian philosophy has developed through the introspective
efforts of a great number of people, including Sy Leon. The next
time you hear someone extol the idea of having “none of the above”
on ballots, think a kind thought of Sy, who did so much to popularize
this alternative to modern politics.
As for myself,
and remembering Sy’s wonderful sense of humor, I will choose to
remember him in words that I know he would have appreciated. They
are those that H.L. Mencken selected for his own epitaph: “If,
after I depart this vale, you ever remember me and have thought
to please my ghost, forgive some sinner, and wink your eye at
some homely girl.”