|
FDA
One Step Away From Declaring Dietary Supplements Drugs
by
Bill Sardi
by Bill Sardi
President Barack
Obama has appointed two experts, one in food the other in drugs,
to head up the soon to be reorganized Food & Drug Administration
in preparation for an agency split that would separate the FDA into
two – one agency to oversee foods and the other to regulate drugs.
But just exactly where does that leave dietary supplements?
The Dietary
Supplement Health & Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) declares dietary
supplements to be products intended to supplement the diet. But
the FDA contends DSHEA severely limits the FDA in regulating a growing
industry. A recently issued report from the General Accounting Office
claims the FDA does not have the resources to adequately regulate
dietary supplements. The GAO report appears to be part of an orchestrated
effort to soften the public up for a major change in the classification
and regulation of dietary supplements.
Unlike drugs
which must be approved for safety and efficacy before entering the
market, dietary supplements marketed before 1994 are presumed to
be safe. FDA must demonstrate that a product presents a significant
or unreasonable risk to the public to get it off the market. But
that may change.
An ominous
sign of things to come – the FDA just classified a form of vitamin
B6 (pyridoxine) as a new drug (Pyridorin, Biostratum).
Despite recent
outbreaks of foodborne disease (Salmonella in peanuts) and approval
of deadly or problematic drugs (recently Vioxx, Seroquel, many others)
compared against few if any reported deaths in the newly implemented
Adverse Event Reporting for dietary supplements, the Federal government
is aiming its regulatory muscle at vitamin, mineral and herbal pills.
Despite the
fact that dietary supplements are far safer than table salt, aspirin,
vaccines and many FDA-approved drugs, they are being demonized.
Year after year, surveys conducted by poison control centers show
dietary supplements to be the safest products of all.
In a misdirection,
it appears food supplements are being mischaracterized as potentially
dangerous and in need of greater regulatory oversight. This leads
to the possibility of FDA placing supplements under the same regulatory
body that oversees drugs.
The FDA appears
to be covering for the sins of the drug companies, which is pushing
for faster approval of new drugs, which led to the Vioxx fiasco
(it is estimated 20,000 Americans died prematurely from taking this
anti-inflammatory drug that should have never been approved by the
FDA). Vioxx, if you recall, was touted as being safer than other
anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen and aspirin.
Just recently
it was revealed that salespeople for a U.S. drug company told doctors
that an anti-psychotic drug (Seroquel- $4.45 billion in sales 2008)
didn't cause diabetes more than two years after the drug maker warned
physicians in Japan of possible links to the disease. Twelve serious
cases (including 1 death) of hyperglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis
and diabetic coma here causally linked with the drug. What penalties
a drug company will receive from the FDA for this type of apparent
misdeed is unknown.
Massive efforts
have been taken to convince the public to be wary of dietary supplements.
Just when DSHEA was being deliberated for passage in Congress in
October of 1994, suddenly a report was published in New England
Journal of Medicine claiming beta carotene pills increased the risk
of death among smokers in Finland. But examination of the published
paper showed beta carotene hardly increased mortality rates at all
(by less than 1%).
For years the
FDA drug its feet in publishing Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)
for the dietary supplement industry, while pointing fingers at and
sanctioning supplement makers who made marginal quality products,
often mislabeled for dosage or for making false advertising claims.
Only recently has the FDA completed GMP guidelines for food supplements.
In
2006 the FDA drew fire when it declared tart cherry supplements
to be "new drugs" because manufacturers claimed their products had
potent anti-inflammatory properties. Another agency of the government,
the US Department of Agriculture, published a study showing tart
cherry extract is as effective as ibuprofen in reducing inflammation.
Ibuprofen can cause gastric problems that can lead to bleeding ulcers
and even death. Tart cherry extract has no reported side effects.
In this manner the FDA restricts free speech and the public is deprived
of learning ways to stay healthy naturally and practice self care.
In 1994 Americans
wrote more letters to Congress to maintain access to dietary supplements
than on any other piece of legislation to date.
Imagine you
are on a cruise ship where people are getting sick from Norovirus
in contaminated shellfish, and the ship's doctor is dispensing poorly-made
sea-sick medicine that is making people ill as well, and the captain
overlooks these problems, declares he doesn't have enough authority
over people taking vitamin pills below-decks and demands everybody
dump their vitamin pills overboard. This is what is going on at
the FDA today.
March
23, 2009
Bill
Sardi [send
him mail] is a frequent writer on health and political
topics. His health writings can be found at www.naturalhealthlibrarian.com.
He is the author of You
Don’t Have To Be Afraid Of Cancer Anymore.
Copyright
© 2009 Bill Sardi Word of Knowledge Agency, San Dimas, California.
This article has been written exclusively for www.LewRockwell.com
and other parties who wish to refer to it should request permission
to link rather than posting at other URLs.
Bill
Sardi Archives
|