The Bubble That Must Burst
by
Michael S. Rozeff
by Michael S. Rozeff
The bubble
that must burst is a very, very large bubble. It is worldwide. It
is co-existent with most nations of the world.
Like all bubbles,
for a time it appears rational. It even seems to work. The bubble
seems to bring all gains and no losses, and all at very low cost.
The returns seem very high and never-ending. They attract the resources
and allegiance of many because the yield seems so high.
But like all
bubbles it cannot go on forever, because it is based on greed and
gain extracted from other persons against their wills. It is a bubble
based on extrapolative expectations that eventually cannot be sustained
by reality.
What is this
bubble? It is the bubble of constitutional and representative democracies
that lack the consent of all of those being governed. It is the
bubble of states that promise more and more social gains and cannot
deliver upon these promises. It is a bubble of governments that
are chain letters and Ponzi schemes. It is a bubble built upon robbing
some to pay others.
All of these
bubbles must, by the dynamic of their intrinsic nature, come
to an end. They all must, by the necessity of facing reality,
be deflated. And, in the process, the peoples of the earth will
have to come face to face with themselves and will have to fashion
new social and political relations.
The constitutional
and representative democracies cannot be saved by changing
the leadership, because they are based on rules of force that must
come to grief. They cannot be changed by voting. No stable economy
can be reflated by a central bank, and no stable nation can be reflated
by voting in new leaders. Counter-intuitively, the government bubble
will burst when more and more people do not vote and withdraw
their support from a government based on unworkable and unjust rules
of force.
Democracy,
as people are now exercising it through majority force throughout
the world, is rotten to the core. It is common within these government
systems for people to rush to take advantage of anyone else they
can, in their greed. Democracy has become one big speculative bubble,
as many people have placed bets on an ever-expanding gain for themselves
at the expense of others. This cannot go on indefinitely, so it
is a bubble that has to burst.
Chain letters
must come to an end. Ponzi schemes must unravel. The music must
stop and there will not be enough chairs for all to sit on. Speculative
bubbles must burst. Governments built upon ever-expanding circles
of greed and gain must fail. Trees do not grow to the sky.
Deep down,
we know this. We only hope that we will not be the one left standing
when the music stops. We only hope the system will last another
10 or 20 or 30 years or whatever life we have left. We wish our
children and grandchildren well, but we are secretly glad that we
do not have to confront the problems we hope will be deferred to
them and not fall upon us.
Why must bubbles
burst? Basically because they cannot pay off according to our expectations.
Take the housing
bubble as an example, but a bubble in growth stocks works in the
same way. Changes in expectations cause price changes. If we think
houses will rise in price, we are more inclined to buy them. This
makes the price rise. It reinforces our expectations and draws in
new buyers. Many causes of changes in expectations are possible.
In the U.S., we had lower interest rates and the authorities encouraged
re-financing at lower rates. In some places, new house building
was restricted as in California. House prices started to rise. This
started a speculative move in which people started bidding house
prices higher. This was concentrated in a handful of states. Some
areas grew because they had a real business boom. The idea got around,
from several sources, that prices were rising. People had extrapolative
expectations. They thought that what was past was prologue. These
expectations self-reinforced for a while, even years.
Eventually,
the reality sets in, which is that the asset cannot rise too fast
in price indefinitely. It sets in for a number of reasons. Builders
build houses at much lower replacement costs, drawing demand away
from the high-priced houses. They also build more of the high-priced
houses than there are buyers. Rentals begin to look relatively less
expensive. The market runs out of new buyers, because prices are
high compared to wages and salaries. Other investments begin to
look relatively more attractive. Interest rates rise. Speculators
begin to sell out what they had bought earlier in order to take
profits. The bubble bursts, as it has to.
People are
expecting a big profit, or a high yield from the house purchase.
That is why they buy at high prices. They think they are going higher.
When people count into their calculation of a high yield the expected
future price gains, as in buying high-priced growth stocks or high-priced
houses, they are pouring money into these assets thinking they have
higher yields, and they are bidding the prices up so as to get those
yields. In the process, the yields are falling. The whole price
process is driven by what is in their minds because it's all what
they expect will happen in the future.
Greed for gain
comes to grief. Many people and institutions borrowed heavily to
take advantage of the housing bubble. It was like the stock margin
buying in the 1920s. All of those that used so much financial leverage
should fail. We who did not should not be made to pay them for their
greed and mistakes. All the ones that took out asset insurance from
counterparties that had no assets they erred in their evaluations
too, and they also should bear their own losses or fail. Innocent
people shouldn't be paying for the mistakes of others. All the ones
that can't pay for their houses now and are under water should face
the consequences themselves. They too blundered. No one should be
made to bail out someone else.
This is not
the way of most governments, however. Bailouts are the way. The
attempt is to find chairs for those left standing. The chairs have
to be stolen from those who were prudent enough to sit down earlier
before the music stopped and the game of musical chairs ended. Governments
today routinely violate basic human rights to life, liberty, and
property.
Government
bailouts are the government’s absorption of the housing bubble into
its own social security bubble. This hastens the bursting of the
government bubble.
Generations
before us started the government bubbles that now rule us. They
bet on government. They saw gains coming down the pike as they collected
their Social Security and built their subsidized houses and drove
on their subsidized highways and grew their subsidized crops, all
through subsidized loans. They saw gains from favoring labor and
executives and public schools. The bubble grew because shifting
coalitions bid up the power of government and collected the gains.
Voters psychologically buy into the government bubble. They have
extrapolative expectations. They think that they will secure the
gains that the earlier generation managed to extract. But those
gains are in their minds. They are unpaid promises made by their
officials. Who will pay for those gains? Who will pay for the bailouts,
the health care promises, the retirement promises, and all the other
trillions upon trillions of guarantees being liberally handed out?
The bubble has to burst. There’s only so much gold in them thar
hills before the price of extraction rises beyond its worth.
One can do
no wrong by buying a house that is going up in price, or so it appears.
And one can do no wrong by endorsing a government that provides
a rising stream of benefits, or so it seems. Why not buy a second
home or a third? Why not borrow to buy them? And why not expand
the government and get more benefits? Why not have the government
borrow to provide them?
Government
in its current form is an overpriced growth stock. It is paying
dividends out of contributions forced out of newcomers to the game
and extracted in countless ways from the dividend recipients and
obtained from borrowing. It is promising a rising stream of future
dividends, while itself producing nothing of value.
When the value
of the obligatory debts exceeds the value of the assets, the enterprise
is insolvent. The owners walk away from the assets. When government
debts exceed the value of the social benefits, people will walk
away from the government. Many already have, in a variety of ways.
Why pay more than what something is worth? Why invest any emotional
capital in an institution one regards as unfit, unjust, inefficient,
intrusive, irrational, unworkable, and ineffective?
Government
is now an insolvent enterprise. Government is a Ponzi scheme. Government
is a fraud. Government is a bubble that must burst.
That being
the case and while there is still time to think without the pressure
of rapidly changing events, we can only benefit by exploring and
considering a wide range of social and political options that are
in accord with basic and sound principles of peace, liberty, justice,
and rights. A period of revolutionary reconstruction lies ahead
of us. We should not be reflating the government bubble that will
burst; we should not be reflating the forces of domination and greed
exercised through and by coercive government.
We should be
shaking off the myths, fallacies, errors, and wrong turns of the
past. We should be stating, and reinstating, and advancing those
principles that can shape societies along sound lines. There are
sound ideas that came along with constitutional governments, but
they have been shunted aside and diluted. Consent of the governed,
all of the governed, is one of those principles. This implies a
second principle: Government without claim over territory, or an
end to the idea that a sovereign has a right to claim rule over
a territory and every person and thing within it. No person can
rightfully be made a citizen of a government without his consent
and by virtue of the place where he happens to live.
The
internet can be a model of what is to come with respect to getting
to a much-reduced arbitrary and non-consensual governance and a
situation where social interactions are freed from unnecessary coercive
restrictions. People can freely join whatever societies of persons
they wish throughout the globe in a way that surpasses the force-ridden
idea of territorial domains. The internet has no such territorial
borders, and such borders only reinforce coercion as well as being
the product of coercion. The internet is breaking down those borders
as it opens up communications.
The bubble
governments of the present have vastly intruded upon social matters.
They have made the social into the political in areas where they
have not obtained the consent of all. There is a large enough and
difficult enough realm of governance without government absorbing
society. There are all sorts of disputes, conflicts, and crimes
that require governance and justice procedures. Libertarians have
thought long and hard about how to preserve and improve these governance
systems, even as the non-consensual features of the present bubble
governments fall by the wayside when these bubbles eventually burst.
Libertarians have thought long and hard about rights, rule of law,
due process, and property rights. This thinking needs to be continued,
questioned, tested, ramped up, restated, refined, integrated, and
understood even better. The government bubble is going to burst,
and we will need this and more thinking in order to cope with the
coming opportunities to remake social and political relations.
March
26, 2009
Michael
S. Rozeff [send him mail]
is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Michael
S. Rozeff Archives
|