As 2008 Fades Away
by
Michael S. Rozeff
by Michael S. Rozeff
DIGG THIS
As 2009 approaches
and 2008 fades away, I have a few thoughts about our economy. Perhaps
you can factor them into your forecasts of what lies ahead.
-
The people
at the Federal Reserve understand the mechanics of money creation
far better than the central bankers who created the German hyperinflation.
The mistakes they make will be different than the mistakes of
the German central bankers.
-
Hyperinflation
would destroy the system. The Fed does not want that to happen.
-
Despite
their intentions, the people at the Fed can destroy the system.
They risk doing that now.
-
The Fed
has a long history of over-staying its policies. It creates
too much money when it is trying to revive the economy and creates
too little when it is trying to slow it down. The latest example
was when Greenspan gunned up money to get the economy out of
the last recession. The members of the Federal Reserve Board
will wait until they see a variety of prices rising before they
worry about the monetary base being too high.
-
For quite
a long time, Greenspan followed the price of gold as he conducted
monetary policy. He abandoned that policy in 2001 when the economy
went into recession. The Fed succumbs to political pressures.
-
Chairman
Bernanke is an inflationist. He does not want another Great
Depression, and he is willing to risk a collapse in the dollar
and the system in an attempt to prevent it. There are some anti-inflationists
on the Federal Reserve Board. They are in the minority. They
may weakly voice some reservations, but they will go along to
get along.
-
The Fed
further weakened the backing of the dollar in 2008 by replacing
Treasury securities with debts of questionable worth.
-
The dollar
has been devalued against gold already. The market did this.
By various estimates that relate gold to consumer and other
prices, gold should be around $600. However, it's now $870 or
so. The price of gold is saying that there already has been
a large devaluation, of the order of 50%. Prices in the economy
generally rise after devaluations, although the process may
take 5 years.
-
The Treasury
and members of the government are less knowledgeable about finance
than those in the Fed. They are also subject to greater political
pressure. The Congress will blithely run big deficits. These
will pressure the Fed to create money by buying the debt issues.
The Fed has already signaled its willingness to buy this debt
and buy all sorts of other debts, like consumer installment
debt and mortgage paper.
-
The entire
method of attempting to revive an economy by central bank and
government manipulations is flawed. It creates a sick and weak
economy based on undue credit creation and higher and higher
debt burdens. This was done already from 2001 onwards and created
the current economic decline.
-
The "natural"
or unhampered and unmanipulated economy, operating freely and
without government compulsion and intrusion, proceeds alongside
the sick economy. Think of the Big 3 automakers, Fannie, and
Freddie as examples of sickness; think of banks lending too
much money to both sound and unsound borrowers to buy property.
-
The natural
economy is what always keeps things going and produces the taxes
that support the dollar and the government. It produces the
goods and services we all want. The sick economy absorbs more
resources than it gives back. It destroys value.
-
The natural
economy gets stunted and suppressed when government directs
resources to the sick economy through undue credit creation,
to subsidies to sick companies, and to wealth transfers to people
who gambled and lost.
-
The economy
is very large. Neither the Fed nor the government can really
control it. The attempt to do so weakens them and the economy
both, which means it hurts us. Since this crash is so large
and there is so much bad debt, at best the economy will limp
along despite the massive government efforts.
-
The government
and the Fed will be weaker than ever in terms of revenues and
basic balance sheet health. But these institutions have power,
with the blessing of the American people, and they are using
it in large doses. They can paper over things for a while.
-
The extremely
low yields on Treasuries are a negative sign. It shows that
the economy is not producing real returns. It is stagnating.
The same thing happened in the 1930s and in the Japanese economy
from 1989 onwards.
-
The best
way to have adjusted in 2008 was not chosen by our officials.
That way was bankruptcy and re-organization in the economy.
It would have been painful, but it would have led to a better-founded,
more free, and healthier natural economy. The governmentFed
way risks a breakdown of the economic and political system in
a host of ways, leading to virtual dictatorship, economic controls,
inflation, and slow growth.
-
In the
past, these government-engineered revivals have not really worked.
Just the opposite, as is happening now with the economy sinking
into depression. FDR's New Deal didn't work. The Japanese government
and central bank have failed to revive the Japanese economy
since 1989, for almost 20 years. Their stock market (Nikkei
225) is 8,667 now. The peak in 1989 was 38,916. If the S &
P 500 falls by the same percentage, it will fall from a peak
of 1,562.47 to 348. It is now 904. Companies can’t make profits
in these sick economies. Growth grinds to a halt.
-
The Japanese
short-term government bonds have yielded near 0 percent for
a long time. People borrow them and sell them short. They invest
the proceeds in other higher-yielding government bonds, driving
down their yields. This makes corporate securities look attractive,
so people buy them. We then get over-investment in long-term
projects that have very low returns.
-
Public
works projects are a loser. They are low-return projects. The
people working construction make money for awhile, while the
rest of us lose. The actual welfare of all of the people does
not improve even if the GDP holds on or grows a little. Government
spending that is included in GDP doesn’t add to the well-being
of most of us. The actual well-being of people is what counts,
not GDP growth, not how many pyramids we build in order to keep
people "working."
-
Our sickly
economy reflects our politics. We have a politics of big government
control and intervention. There is no widespread disillusionment
yet with this politics.
Social madness,
which entails large-scale mal-adaptive and harmful behavior, is
a fact of life. In religious terms, it is a manifestation of original
sin. At times, this looks like a kind of mass craziness.
Alfred Hitchcock’s
Shadow
of a Doubt tells the story of a murderer (Uncle Charlie,
played by Joseph Cotten) who is on the run and visits his home town.
His niece is Young Charlie (played by Teresa Wright). Her romantic
interest is Jack Graham (McDonald Carey). The screenplay is mainly
by Thornton Wilder. The film dates from 1943.
At the very
end, Young Charlie ruminates about Uncle Charlie:
Young
Charlie: He thought the world was a horrible place. He couldn’t
have been very happy ever.
Jack: No.
Young Charlie:
He didn’t trust people. He seemed to hate them. He hated the whole
world. You know, he said that people like us had no idea what
the world was really like.
Jack: Well,
it’s not quite as bad as that, but sometimes it needs a lot of
watching. It seems to go crazy every now and then, like your Uncle
Charlie.
I wish you
all a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Your many e-mails have
provided me not only with support and encouragement but also with
many good and stimulating ideas. You have replaced my seminars with
a larger-scale seminar.
December
19, 2008
Michael
S. Rozeff [send him mail]
is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Michael
S. Rozeff Archives
|