Terminate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
by
Michael S. Rozeff
by Michael S. Rozeff
DIGG THIS
I am a minority
of one, or a very small number, in thinking that the failures of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are good news.
These two companies
should not exist. No private companies should have lines of credit
to the U.S. Treasury, that is, U.S. taxpayers. No private companies
should be linked to a government mandate that they facilitate affordable
housing by buying up mortgages. No private companies should issue
debts that investors believe may have an implicit guarantee provided
by taxpayers.
The only bad
thing about these failures is what the Federal government may do
next to keep them alive. The only bad thing is that the Federal
government will probably make matters worse.
This is a golden
opportunity to end these enterprises once and for all. And doing
that is incredibly simple! Any Wall Street investment bank can,
in short order, produce a plan to restructure these companies and
charge the appropriate (high) fees for carrying out that plan. The
possible ways to restructure include sales of the assets, creating
subsidiaries and selling them, spinning off subsidiary companies,
and breaking up the company into several companies. Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac could also put their entire companies up for sale.
Such restructurings
are Wall Street’s bread and butter. The equity values of these companies
have already fallen considerably. Their value in a restructuring
may be quite small, but control does have a non-negligible value.
The markets are already pricing the debts of these two giants at
less than face value, despite the chance of an implicit guarantee
or a taxpayer bailout. The debt-holders took a chance buying this
paper. They should bear the consequences. Restructuring will reveal
the true worth of these debt securities.
Investors in
these enterprises, both debt and equity holders, should not be bailed
out by the taxpayers. These two companies made bad investments by
buying mortgages that have gone bad. These two companies also issued
too much debt to finance these investments, which gave them very
shaky financial structures. The worth of their assets is less than
the worth of their liabilities, which makes them insolvent. They
are not yet bankrupt. They still have the cash to service their
debts. These debts are by no means worthless. About 11.6 percent
of money market funds are invested in agency debt. At current prices
of these debts, news of money market troubles has not surfaced.
If those prices fell by 10 percent, the money market losses would
be a modest 1 percent.
Any restructuring
presumes what is not in evidence, which is that the Federal government
has to sever completely its relationships with housing markets and
specifically with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. There’s the rub. Congress
won’t do this, unless seized by some unforeseen miracle of rationality.
There are millions
of Americans who may fear the dissolution of these companies. They
will wonder where they will get mortgages from. There are hundreds
of columnists who share this fear. Some will pretend to hold their
nose while supporting a government bailout. Some will want to maintain
the government’s interference in housing markets or even expand
it as a matter of public policy.
There is nothing
to fear. The amount of money on the sidelines that is available
for funding mortgages is tremendous. It can be coaxed into mortgages
if the interest rates paid are high enough. A free market in mortgages
will easily provide capital to creditworthy borrowers. But that
too is the rub. The government wants to keep mortgage rates low
so as to keep the housing industry going and to satisfy the voters
who take out mortgages. The government does not want a free market
in mortgages, and that is because neither voters nor the housing
industry want a free market in housing. As long as there is a government
that is empowered to interfere, the pressure to interfere will overcome
the free market.
Democracy just
does not work, my friends! Sooner or later, in this case 70 years
later, 70 years after Fannie Mae began, the system starts to break
down. Call it what you will, democratic socialism or democratic
fascism or both, democracy does not work. It doesn’t work in agriculture,
in the military, in the space program, in the banking system, or
in any other part of an economy. Sooner or later, depending on various
particulars, blowups occur.
Without the
government in the picture, there is no way that Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac could ever have grown so large. Their balance sheet assets (and
liabilities) total about $1.6 trillion. They have off-balance liabilities
of another $3.5 trillion or so. How big is $5 trillion? The national
debt of the U.S. is $9.5 trillion!
It is almost
unbelievable that these two companies could have run up debts that
are more than half the size of the country’s national debt. But
that is inherent in the chemistry of government + housing + debt
guarantees. The housing market is huge, especially over time as
the housing stock accumulates. By giving Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac an advantage in issuing debt, these companies came to dominate
the housing finance market. There is no better time than now to
end this absurdity.
Freddie Mac
faces huge
losses, as much as $775,000,000. Its equity can easily be wiped
out. That means bankruptcy. That is nothing to fear, either. That
means that restructuring will be forced upon the company. The point
is to let it happen and happen quickly and get the government out
of the picture altogether.
Naturally,
this has not been what the government has been doing. Instead, it
has done the opposite so far. Congress has passed a bill that awaits
the President’s signature or veto. There will be a deal. The bill
increases mortgage loan limits drastically. Smart move, guys.
Pelosi wants them even higher, $730,000 instead of $625,000.
Mr. Corruption
himself, Chris
Dodd, is the lead sponsor of the bill. Even as the stocks of
these two companies approach $0, he reassures the public that the
CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Ben Bernanke tell him that
they are not at risk of default. This is a bald-faced lie. Failure
to face and state truths is a national addiction. The predilection
to lie in the face of bad news is so ingrained that our leaders
no longer can even detect the difference between what is true and
what is false. They lie and they know they lie. But they also believe
their lies because they believe their lies to be political necessities.
Can
liars even begin to think straight about what should be done that
is in the long-run interest of the American public? If they could
think straight, could they summon the courage to act? Democracy
encourages lies, liars, and cowardice in the face of voters and
payoffs. Democracy just does not work, my friends.
Terminate Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac. Sever the relations with the government and
let Wall Street, or investment bankers in San Francisco or Austin
or Boston or Tallahassee do what they know best, which is restructure
these companies. All the mortgages held or guaranteed by them will
still be held and serviced, but by new companies and new investors.
Problem solved.
July
16, 2008
Michael
S. Rozeff [send him mail]
is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Michael
S. Rozeff Archives
|