Will
the TSA Be Always With Us?
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
It's hard to
know which Bush policies – every day, another disaster – will most
immortalize this administration. But on this day, in this hour,
I'm going to suggest that his name should be forever mud for his
catastrophic decision to nationalize airline security after 9-11.
There is war,
spending, and missed opportunities all around, but generations hence
might still be suffering at the hands of the Transportation Security
Administration. It was hardly opposed by any mainstream voice of
opinion. But anyone with a brain cell of economic understanding
knew that airline socialism was not the best way to deal with the
hijacking threat.
The TSA appearance
on the national scene was treated as inevitable as a reflex, as
in: the rubber mallet hits the knee and the knee jerks. Yes, even
in the land of free enterprise, the first political instinct of
the national elite is to purport to solve any and every problem
with the creation of a massive new bureaucracy. The government wins
at this game but the rest of us lose.
The main effect
of the TSA? We could talk about the massive increase in theft from
baggage (exhibit
A; exhibit B;
exhibit
C). It used to be the case that you only had to worry about
thievery when traveling internationally, especially through countries
where government agents are in charge of baggage and security. Now
the same is true in the good old USA.
We could draw
attention to the loss of travel freedom, such that federal snoops
have become the gatekeepers that allow us to fly from here to there.
If they don't like you, you can't fly. This power is not only subject
to abuse; it itself is an abuse. The private sector looks for customers,
and only blacklists genuine dangers. The government has a penchant
for only whitelisting its political friends. Woe to those on the
blacklist.
A Bush partisan
may say: oh this stuff can be fixed. And yes, Congress and regulators
can attempt a crackdown on TSA thievery and abuse of citizens. But
the propensity will always be there in any government bureaucracy
because they are not working for you but for the mythical blob called
the "public sector," which is really nothing but a stash of stolen
cash divided among the robber class.
But let us
discuss something more practical: the incredible waste of time and
the unrelenting frustration that flying has become since the TSA
took over.
When you first
get to the airport, you enjoy the speed and friendliness of the
airline employee who processes your ticket.
Then, suddenly,
the joy ends. You find yourself in the TSA mire. Your bags must
be rummaged through. You must have your papers checked. You must
be badgered and belittled by various functionaries who treat you
like an inmate in their prison. Babies must be snatched from mothers,
stinky feet must be discalced, nail files must be confiscated, and
all your personal belongings must be strewn about for all to ogle.
Even so, is
security increased? Doubtful. Sometimes the process seems orderly
and, at other times, it seems nearly chaotic.
When you leave
the grip of the TSA and finally enter the private sector again,
it's like Dorothy viewing Oz. Employees, even unionized ones, work
like never before to make sure that you are cared for and treated
properly. They almost seem to express a kind of regret for the way
everyone has been so mishandled by the TSA.
The main cost
aside from respect for human dignity is time. Airlines themselves
are working very hard to make up for the difference. The more quickly
they can get people on and off the plane, the more flights they
can run in a day. In times of thinning profit margins from the high
price of gas (thanks again, Bush!), the scramble is on to save money
somehow.
We
read in Wired the supremely interesting
saga of how airlines are experimenting with new ways of seating
people. The point is to minimize the struggles between passengers.
It was once thought that seating from back to front is the best
way. But some experts have found that just by letting people board
and find any seat, passengers work out their own difficulties and
get situated. Other people who have studied this recommend a "reverse
pyramid" method of seating people.
What's the
goal? To speed up boarding. That makes more flights possible, improves
profitability, and leads to lower prices. All of this is good for
the consumer. Who wouldn't want to shave off time that one has to
spend hanging around airports?
So
here is one example among trillions: the airlines' interest is the
same as the consumers'. Imagine that: the market at work. Might
the same mechanisms be used to improve airline security? We don't
know for sure how the airlines would have responded to 9-11, but
whatever they did would have not been structured to punish consumers.
Instead we
got the TSA, a Stalinist creation. Everyone please do his or her
part to pin this dreadful agency on the Bush administration, which
is precisely where the blame belongs.
May
10, 2006
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr. [send him
mail] is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, editor of LewRockwell.com
and author of Speaking
of Liberty.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Lew
Rockwell Archives
|