Make
the Holiday Permanent
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
Well, Hell’s bells, some Senate Democrats are supporting a good
idea. It happens so rarely that it is worth taking note. Their idea
is to grant a payroll-tax holiday for one month.
That’s right: no Social Security and no Medicare premiums for a
solid thirty days. Not only is the worker to be unshackled from
these taxes, but the employer too. If the idea goes through, for
one shining one-twelfth of the year, we can all live without these
ghastly invasions eating away at paychecks and payrolls.
Promoting this tax holiday is Tom Carper of Delaware along with
Pete Domenici of New Mexico, who first suggested it. It is being
pushed as a way to break the stimulus gridlock, which came about
because each party wants to use the stimulus to reward its own constituents
without allowing the other party to take credit for helping its
constituents. But a payroll tax holiday is something that everyone
can and should agree on.
For years, the tax-cut debate has been bogged down in a futile
argument over which kind of tax cuts stimulate. Influenced by supply-side
ideology, the Republicans stand ready to support capital-gains tax
cuts and a flattening of rates. The Democrats, meanwhile, warm only
to those cuts that directly affect workers’ paychecks, and thus
favor (but somehow never pass) the middle-class tax cut that Clinton
used to talk about.
Each side accuses the other of using fiscal policy to play politics,
and each is certainly guilty. But the Democrats are wrong to say
that cutting capital-gains, lowering rates, or eliminating the Alternative
Minimum Tax only helps the rich. Cutting penalties for producing
yields benefits for the entire economy. At the same time, Republicans
are wrong to dismiss the effect of tax cuts for workers. Keeping
private property private is the essence of free enterprise, the
most productive system of economics known to man.
The answer to this debate is to recognize that the best way to
cut taxes is to cut them anywhere and everywhere. An analogy would
be an effort to curb a crime wave. Is it better to stop burglaries
or car thefts? So long as authorities debate this, the crime wave
continues. The answer is to cut both, or, if that’s not possible,
just flip a coin and stop one or the other.
The payroll-tax holiday has the beauty of clarity. It would permit
American workers and business to retain ownership to some $40 billion
that would otherwise be forked over to the government. The money
could then be spent, saved, or invested, doing far more good in
the private sector than the same amount sent to Washington has ever
done. In calling this tax cut a stimulus, the politicians are implicitly
recognizing a great truth: these taxes are a drag on the nation’s
economic life.
The idea of allowing workers and business to stop paying into Social
Security for one month is great for another reason: it gets us on
the only path to reforming that system. Both the people who believe
in "privatization" and those who want a bailout (sometimes
its difficult to tell them apart) have completely overlooked the
solution of allowing people to opt out.
After the holiday is over, a deal could be offered to workers.
Those who want to receive Social Security when they retire can continue
to pay. Those who do not can just stop paying in, and thereby relinquish
the rights they have to the money already put into the system (and
long ago spent). Let workers make their own uncoerced choice. The
system will remain financially viable, and millions of people will
be let off the hook from an operation that taxes so heavily and
pays so little.
The same is true of Medicare. The market economy now offers a huge
range of medical insurance packages that offer security in old age.
Those who drop out of the government system will be in a position
to pay premiums for private coverage, if they desire it. Again,
the solution is to let people opt out, not just for one month but
for forever. This is a sure path to reforming the system and lightening
its financial burden on the taxpayer.
A
tax holiday is better than a rebate because it eliminates the absurd
costs associated with sending money to DC only to have it sent back
again in the new form. A rebate also tempts people into being grateful
to politicians when they should be angry at them for taxing them
in the first place. A tax holiday also underscores the essential
issue of ownership: money earned by workers belongs to the workers
themselves.
So here’s to the payroll-tax holiday. May it have a very long life.
December
5, 2001
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr. [send
him mail], is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, and editor of LewRockwell.com.
Copyright
© 2001 LewRockwell.com
Lew
Rockwell Archives
The
Truth Needs Your Support
Please
make a donation to help LewRockwell.com tell it,
no matter what nefarious plans Leviathan has.
|