$300 Billion Terrorist Training Ground
by
Paul Craig Roberts
by Paul Craig Roberts
Capitol
Hill Blue, the Washington DC publication that cultivates relationships
with White House staffers, reports (September 28) one White House
aide saying: "It’s like working in an insane asylum. People
walk around like they’re in a trance. We’re the dance band on the
Titanic, playing out our last songs to people who know the ship
is sinking and none of us are going to make it."
"If
POTUS is on the road, you can breathe a little easier," says
an aide. Otherwise it is one temper tantrum after another from Bush,
whose "cakewalk war" has turned into interminable conflict,
whose idiocy in diverting funding for New Orleans’ levees to war
in Iraq was disastrous for the famous city, and whose Social Security
privatization has been rejected by the electorate.
Even
rah-rah Republican Newt Gingrich says the White House is surrounded
by failure.
No
member of the White House staff wants to deliver news to Bush, because
the news is bad. Bush demands sycophancy and equates bad news with
disagreement and disloyalty.
Little
wonder that Republican minority token Condi Rice was dispatched
to Princeton last week to inform the university that democracy comes
out of the barrel of a gun. US military force, said the secretary
of state with a straight face, is required to force democracy down
the throats of the Muslims in order to save future American generations
from "insecurity and fear."
Condi
obviously doesn’t want Bush to put her in the "against us"
camp. She told Princeton that she agreed with Bush "that the
root cause of September 11 was the violent expression of a global
extremist ideology, an ideology rooted in the oppression and despair
of the modern Middle East."
Every
American should be scared to death that a secretary of state can
make such an ignorant and propagandistic statement.
Many
Middle Eastern countries are ruled by puppets on the American payroll.
Even the Saudis are under American protection. If there is oppression
in the Middle East, it is because US puppets and protectorates are
doing what the US government wants, not what the people they rule
want.
The
Middle East is in despair because almost a century after the First
World War freed Arabs from Turkish occupation, they still cannot
get free of US and British occupation. The reasons Osama bin Laden
has a cause among Muslims are US military bases in the Middle East.
What
kind of fool believes that the way to bring democracy to a country
is to invade, destroy cities and infrastructure, and kill and maim
tens of thousands of civilians, while creating every possible animosity
by aligning with some members of the society against the others?
Condi
Rice’s speech at Princeton has branded her as the greatest fool
ever to be appointed Secretary of State. The same day that she declared,
Mao-like, that democracy comes out of the barrel of a gun, Lt. Gen.
William Odom, Director of the National Security Agency during President
Reagan’s second term, a scholar with a distinguished career in military
intelligence, declared Bush’s invasion of Iraq to be the "greatest
strategic disaster in United States history."
No
one can impugn Gen. Odom’s patriotism. When I wrote on April 1,
2003, that "the U.S. invasion of Iraq is a strategic blunder,"
the hate mail poured in from bloody-minded Bush supporters, who
assured me that the war would be over in one week. Only a liberal
pinko Bush-hating commie could fail to see that the war was won,
they jeered.
Two
and one-half years later with rising casualties and instability,
no one can dispute Gen. Odom. As all news reports make clear, there
is no trained Iraqi army. Consequently, says the US commander in
Iraq, the hopes that some US troops could be withdrawn next spring
is forlorn.
The
Democratic Party is no help. Its warmongers are pushing legislation
to increase the available US troops by 80,000 in order that the
US can keep the war going in Iraq.
These
troops, too, will perish in the interminable conflict.
Meanwhile
the US, which cannot occupy Baghdad or control the road to the airport,
is making more threats against Syria. The Bush administration is
blaming Syria and Iran for its failure in Iraq. "Our patience
is running out," declared US ambassador to Iraq Zaimay Khalilzad.
The
Israelis have told their US puppet that if the US doesn’t use force
to destroy Iran’s nuclear energy programs, then Israel will undertake
to bomb Iran. This despite the announcement by the director of the
International Atomic Energy Agency that two years of unfettered
access to Iran’s nuclear programs has failed to turn up any sign
of a weapons program.
When
will Americans notice that the threats flow from the US to the Middle
East? No Middle Eastern government has made any threat against the
US or initiated any hostile action. In contrast, the US has invaded
two Middle Eastern countries and is threatening to attack two more.
Terrorism
is not an activity of Muslim states. Osama bin Laden is a Saudi
who dares not return to his homeland.
Most
Muslim states are too impotent to stamp out independent terrorists
and too fearful that terrorist networks will be organized against
them. Ignorant US officials equate weakness with intention and demonize
Middle Eastern governments, including our own puppets and protectorates,
as "state sponsors of terrorism." Isn’t it ironic? The
US damns vulnerable Middle Eastern rulers for not stamping out terrorism
when all the troops and violence the US can muster cannot stamp
out terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The
implication of a recent CIA report is that the US itself is a state
sponsor of terrorism. According to the CIA, the US invasion of Iraq
has created a terrorist training ground for al Qaeda where no previous
terrorists existed. The US is creating more terrorists in Iraq than
the rest of the Middle East together. Why is President Bush spending
$300 billion running a terrorist training ground in Iraq?
Why
does Condi Rice think that democracy would wipe away the hatreds
that the US and Israel have created in the Middle East? How does
she know that Middle Eastern democracy would not uphold terrorism
against Israel and the US? In the US democracy is upholding an illegal
war based on deceit. In Israel democracy is upholding genocidal
practices against the Palestinians. Does Condi Rice really believe
that democracy, a mere political form, insures that people and their
governments never behave wrongly, immorally, or violently?
If
America is going to preach democracy, shouldn’t it lead by example?
According to all the polls, the vast majority of Americans do not
agree with Bush and Rice that democracy comes out of the barrel
of an American gun. They do not support Bush’s goal of using American
blood and treasure to force democracy on the Middle East or anywhere
else. The majority of Americans want the war over and the troops
home. Why do Bush and Condi Rice oppose the will of the majority?
Why don’t these two who preach democracy practice it?
The
Bush administration is the administration of deceit and hypocrisy.
It is the antithesis of democracy. All democracy rests on persuasion,
which implies disagreement. Yet, Bush and Condi regard dissent as
disloyalty. They glorify coercion.
They
believe in their will alone. Where have we seen that before?
October
3, 2005
Dr.
Roberts [send him mail]
is
John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy and Research
Fellow at the Independent Institute.
He is a former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal,
former contributing editor for National Review, and a former
assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury. He is the co-author of
The
Tyranny of Good Intentions.
Copyright
© 2005 Creators Syndicate
Paul
Craig Roberts Archives
|