A Defeat Bred in Deceit
by
Paul Craig Roberts
by Paul Craig Roberts
“Anyone
who has proclaimed violence his method inexorably must choose
lying as his principle.”
~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
When
Bush decided, prior to September 11, to attack Iraq, he committed
himself to lies and deceit. As his British co-conspirators realized,
only victory could save them from the consequences.
On
June 27, General George Casey, US commander of the “multinational
coalition” in Iraq, told morning TV audiences that the conflict
in Iraq “will not be settled on the battlefield.” On June 26, Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told TV audiences that “coalition forces,
foreign forces are not going to repress that insurgency.” The insurgency,
Rumsfeld said, might “go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years.”
These
admissions give the lie to Vice President Cheney’s claim that the
insurgency is in “its last throes.”
Would
Congress have let Bush invade Iraq if Congress had known that it
would not be a 3-week war but a 12-year war?
What
kind of fantastic lie or gross incompetence caused a 12-year war
to be marketed as a 3-week war?
How
can any people, no matter how deceived and deluded, support a government
capable of such miscalculation or deceit?
Would
the Washington Post and the New York Times have been
such willing conduits of neoconservative propaganda against Iraq
it anyone on either paper had enough education to realize the catastrophe
that hubris was creating? What if either paper had possessed enough
of a reporter’s skepticism to ask a question?
General
Casey’s and Secretary Rumsfeld’s remarks make it clear that the
Defense Department has given up the prospect of military victory:
The situation in Iraq, Gen. Casey said, “will ultimately be settled
by negotiation and inclusion in the political process.” Rumsfeld
says the US troops are being killed and maimed in order to “create
an environment that the Iraqi people and the Iraqi security forces
can win against that insurgency.”
After
three years of fighting, Rumsfeld still doesn’t understand that
the Iraqi people are the insurgency. Is Rumsfeld still clinging
to the myth that the insurgency is an outside element injected into
Iraq?
When
will the moronic Bush administration realize that it is creating
the environment in which the insurgency is prevailing?
Many
readers write to me that Bush and his neocon crazies are Israel’s
patsies. An equally good case can be made that Bush and his crazy
neocons are Osama bin Laden’s agents. In a recent speech at the
American University in Cairo, Egypt, Secretary of State Condi Rice
repudiated America’s 60-year-old policy of Middle East stability
and declared: “Now, we are taking a different course.”
Rice,
being completely ignorant of the Middle East, believes that the
path to democracy is through instability. But, of course, instability
is exactly what bin Laden wants. The instability that the Bush administration
is creating will unseat our puppets in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan,
and Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden intends to pick up the pieces.
The
Bush administration has squandered America’s diplomatic, economic,
and military power and is heading for defeat in Iraq, Afghanistan,
and throughout the Middle East. Bush’s invasion of Iraq is fast
becoming one of the greatest strategic blunders in history.
June
28, 2005
Dr.
Roberts [send him mail]
is
John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy and Research
Fellow at the Independent Institute.
He is a former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal,
former contributing editor for National Review, and a former
assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury. He is the co-author of
The
Tyranny of Good Intentions.
Copyright
© 2005 Creators Syndicate
Paul
Craig Roberts Archives
|