The Philosophy of Hemingway
by
Charley
Reese
by Charley Reese
DIGG THIS
I found a
short passage at the end of For
Whom the Bell Tolls that sums up beautifully what I believe
was Ernest Hemingway's philosophy.
The story
is about a mission to blow up a bridge during the Spanish Civil
War, and Robert Jordan, an American who is badly wounded, has elected
to stay behind and try to delay the soldiers while the other guerrillas
escape. It is morning and in the mountains. He knows he will be
killed.
He is thinking
about his own death:
"You
have had much luck. There are many worse things than this. Everyone
has to do this, one day or another. You are not afraid of it once
you know you have to do it, are you? No, he said, truly. ... He
looked down the hill slope again and he thought, I hate to leave
it, is all. I hate to leave it very much and I hope I have done
some good in it. I have tried with what talent I had."
Perhaps Hemingway
was thinking similar thoughts when he was alone in Idaho with the
shotgun. He knew his mind was going and he knew he wouldn't be able
to write anymore, and writing was all that ever mattered to him.
So, while he was still clear, he had to kill himself. In the novel,
Jordan worries that he may pass out from the pain before the enemy
soldiers get there. He, too, thinks of killing himself.
"I think
it would be all right to do it now? Don't you?" Jordan asks
himself. "No it isn't. Because there is something you can do
yet. As long as you know what it is you have to do it. As long as
you remember what it is you have to wait for that."
For Hemingway
there was nothing left to do, nothing to remember, but as much as
he loved life, perhaps those poignant words he had written so long
ago "I hate to leave it, is all. I hate to leave it
very much" came back to him. He had been receiving electroshock
treatment for depression, which interfered with his memory. For
a writer, memory is essential.
If you are
young enough not to have read much of Hemingway, then you have some
pleasurable hours to look forward to. I've read all of his works
published while he was still alive and one that was published posthumously.
Sometimes I reread them, but much of what he wrote was bleak.
A lot of people
these days don't like Hemingway, and that's understandable in these
decadent and effeminate times we live in. He liked to hunt, fish,
box and drink. He was an ardent fan of bullfighting. He was wounded
in World War I driving an ambulance for the American Red Cross,
and he was in two plane crashes. He was under fire in World War
II and in the Spanish Civil War.
The odd thing
is that though he said he hated people writing about his private
life and he never hired a publicity agent, he is surely the most
well-known American writer in the world. The press made him a celebrity.
He
was a stoic and, so far as I can tell, not religious at all. He
knew as well as the old samurai that death was the final destination.
Until you arrive there, he believed in relishing life and in doing
useful work. Consequently, of those things he was interested in,
he took particular pains to learn about them. He labored really
hard at his writing, always with the goal of telling his story truthfully
and as accurately as possible. His prose, at his best, is astounding.
I think I
was either at Fort Bragg or getting ready to report when he checked
out. I was greatly saddened, though I had never met the man. I'm
not a fisherman or a big-game hunter, and if I ever go to a bullfight,
I'm sure I will find myself rooting for the bull. But he was, as
I think he was for most men of my generation, a part of my growing
up. When you're 13 and ignorant and you first read Hemingway, you
say, "Ah, so this is how it is."
June
3, 2008
Charley
Reese [send
him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.
©
2008 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
Charley
Reese Archives
|