Wal-Mart Is Right
by
Charley
Reese
by Charley Reese
Wal-Mart is
the only corporation in the world that I know of or have ever heard
of that is hated because it is successful. What do these critics
want Wal-Mart to do? Fail? Start selling $300 shirts like Saks Fifth
Avenue?
Of course,
some of the hatred is coming from unions, which have tried but,
so far as I know, failed to unionize Wal-Mart's work force. That
one thing tells you that it must be a much better deal to work for
Wal-Mart than its critics let on. Some of the disdain comes from
leftist snobs who think they should run the lives of the peasants
who work and shop there.
I am a small-town
guy who has hated to see so many locally owned small businesses
go under, but that's not Wal-Mart's fault. That trend started years
ago with suburban sprawl (a major contributor to the energy crisis,
by the way), suburban shopping malls, strip malls and all the other
discounters that preceded Wal-Mart in prominence. It was caused
by the American public's preference to buy based on price, rather
than on service or quality. It was caused by local politicians converting
the National Defense Highway System (the interstates) into suburban
and urban commuter systems by routing them through instead of around
the cities.
Wal-Mart is
one of the best-run corporations in the world. The individual consumer
has no clout with suppliers and manufacturers. Wal-Mart uses its
enormous buying clout to get consumers the best price at the best
quality possible. Being a supplier to Wal-Mart is no picnic, as
the company is quite demanding.
It's not Wal-Mart's
fault that much of its merchandise is manufactured in China. The
late Sam Walton went to extraordinary lengths to help American manufacturers,
but Wal-Mart doesn't control any corporation except itself. The
move to China is not coming from Wal-Mart, but from greedy manufacturing
corporations that love cheap and controlled labor. If your competitor
is selling an American brand-name product made in China cheaper
than you can buy one here, and if the customer says, "I don't
care where it's made as long as I can afford it," what are
you going to do?
More recently,
Wal-Mart has been slammed for not providing what its critics think
it should in the way of medical insurance. Well, why is General
Motors flirting with bankruptcy? Why is Ford Motor Co. in financial
trouble? Why, for that matter, is the federal government in financial
trouble? The stinking hag in this room that everyone is ignoring
is the high cost of medical service.
You can't
provide low-cost health care or low-cost medical insurance for a
system run by millionaire doctors and six-figure hospital administrators,
and that has 1,200 percent profit margins for drugs and medical
devices. The health-industry attitude is, we'll profiteer like crazy,
and you people find a way to pay us. If Congress were not a bought-and-paid-for
whore, America could join the rest of the industrialized world with
a reasonable health-care system.
Health-care
costs are one of the key factors in making American manufacturers
uncompetitive. Now that the state of Maryland has presumed to dictate
what kind of benefits Wal-Mart provides, if I ran the company, I'd
close every store in the state and put the property up for sale.
This is just one more ploy in the anti-Wal-Mart crusade.
We have reached
a sick and perverted point in our culture when honesty and success
bring attacks, mainly from people who either don't know what they
are talking about or have a hidden agenda.
Millions of
Americans who earn low wages from other employers rely on Wal-Mart
to help them stretch their family budget. Wal-Mart has kept faith
with those people. I've never found a dirty store, a rude employee
or a defective product in a Wal-Mart store.
If
you prefer to pay more than something's worth in exchange for some
phony ambience or fancy label, go right ahead. In the meantime,
get off Wal-Mart's back. It's one of the few entities in this country
that is doing the right thing the right way for the right reasons.
May
8, 2006
Charley
Reese [send
him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.
©
2006 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
Charley
Reese Archives
|