Stop Hillary!
Yes we can!
by
Justin Raimondo
by Justin Raimondo
DIGG THIS
We
had a breather during the final stretch of the presidential election
campaign, but the way is now cleared for a renewal of the propaganda
campaign urging war with Iran. The latest salvo: a UN report
claiming Iran plans on building 3,000 new centrifuges, and headlines
are screaming
– in the West, at any rate – that Iran will have enough uranium
to build a nuclear bomb by sometime next year. Is this true?
Undoubtedly
not. To begin with, let’s go through the news accounts: here’s
a typical one, a Reuters dispatch, which reports a "stand off" between
Tehran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), run by
the UN, which monitors nuclear activities of member states. To the
ordinary person just glancing at the headline, the assumption is
that the "stand off" is over Iran’s unwillingness to keep its nuclear
facilities open to inspection. Not so. Yet Reuters reports:
"An inquiry
by the UN nuclear watchdog into alleged atom bomb research by
Iran has degenerated into a silent standoff a few months after
Tehran asserted ‘the matter is over’, UN officials said on Wednesday."
If your eyes
glaze over at this point, and you don’t get much further than the
lede, then the story seems to be describing Iranian nuclear research
that will inevitably result in the production of a weapon. Reuters
cites a whiny UN official, who complains: "We had gridlock before
but until September at least we were talking to each other. Now
it's worse. There is no communication whatsoever, no progress regarding
possible military dimensions in their program." It isn’t until several
paragraphs later that it becomes apparent to the casual reader that
the program he’s talking about ended in 2003:
"The report
said that unless Iran produced credible evidence for its denials
that it tried to ‘weaponise’ nuclear materials, or permitted inspections
beyond declared atomic sites, the IAEA could not verify Iran's
enrichment was wholly peaceful."
Remember
last year, when the CIA issued its definitive assessment of the
alleged Iranian nuclear threat? It declared with "high confidence"
that Tehran had ceased its military research program four years
previously. According to the CIA, all those diagrams and dicey computer
disks that somehow showed up in the hands of the Mujahideen-e-Khalq
(MEK), and were pushed by the War Party as evidence of Iran's perfidy,
detailed a program that hadn't been functional for years. (At any
rate, those documents turned out to be forgeries.)
Read
the rest of the article
November
22, 2008
Justin
Raimondo [send him mail]
is editorial director of Antiwar.com
and is the author of An
Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard and Reclaiming
the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement.
Copyright
© 2008 Antiwar.com
|