Paying an Unnecessary Price
by
Murray Polner
by Murray Polner
DIGG THIS
In Deployed:
How Reservists Bear the Burden of Iraq (University of Michigan
Press, 2008) Michael Musheno (chair of the Criminal Justice Studies
department at San Francisco State University) and Susan M. Ross
(Associate Professor of Sociology at Lycoming College) have presented
us with valuable insights in their sympathetic portrayal of 46 anonymous
reservists in the 893rd Military Police Reserve Company, another
pseudonym used in the book. Called to active duty after the invasion
of Iraq, all returned alive.
During the
Vietnam War the reserves (and National Guard as well) were havens
for those wishing to avoid the draft. Those who couldn’t find a
reserve slot or manage a deferment were shipped off to basic training
and if even more unlucky, were sent to Vietnam. Massive infusions
of cannon fodder were desperately needed and Selective Service provided
them. Lyndon Johnson preferred a draft because he was wary of political
opposition from reservist and Guard families eager to keep their
sons at home. Iraq was different. George W. Bush and Richard Cheney
(both non-veterans) sent in the reserves and Guard and let everyone
else alone because above all they wanted a passive public. As of
2006, more than 186,000 reservists had served in Iraq and Afghanistan.
When the 893rd’s
men and women enlisted, they thought they would be "weekend
warriors." For a part-time position the pay was good. (At age
19 I too once joined the reserves, happy to receive government checks,
and later served on active duty). The 893rd ’s reservists
were certainly motivated to join by economic factors. "Simply
put," the authors comment, " a tightening American economy
that squeezes lower and middle-class families’ abilities to provide
for themselves and their children increases participation rates
in the Army Reserve and National Guard." But so did a sense
of nationalism, especially after 9/11 and for others, cultural
orientations [authors’ italics], what Musheno and Ross
define as enlisting as "as a way of enhancing their sense of
themselves."
In their demographic
breakdown of the 46 men and women of the 893rd, the authors
found that they were overwhelmingly male (89.9%), white (71.7%)
enlisted personnel (91.3%), 21.7% had a high school or GED diploma,
while 71.5% had some college, a bachelor’s degree, and more.
In
general, they write, "few Reservists anticipated that they
were beginning a series of deployments that would in many cases
last more than two years and put them for long stints in the midst
of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq," adding that the 893rd
were heading for Baghdad "within days of President Bush’s announcement
on board the USS Abraham Lincoln that the mission in Iraq
had been ‘accomplished.’"
Deployed
is the first of many books and studies to come about "citizen"
soldiers suddenly called to active duty regardless of their marital,
parental, occupational or student status. One reservist received
an afternoon call telling him to report the following morning. Most
had no idea where they going and for how long. Rumors were rampant
but that’s the military way and everyone in the unit accepted their
assignments though we now know that some of the 186,000 reservists
(not part of the 893rd) refused to deploy.
As an MP detachment
and part of the army’s constabulary force they expected to guard
gates, airports, bridges and tunnels, and perhaps arrest some drunks.
Iraq service was different. Some felt estranged from the regulars.
One claimed to have been mistreated by regular noncoms and he and
his mates were viewed as make-believe soldiers. The four women reservists
took care of one another, as did many of the men who formed close
friendships with their fellow reservists. As Musheno and Ross tell
it, some reservists adapted, others struggled with their assignments
in the war-zone and still others resisted as best they could. One
reservist was proud of "what I have done" and easily adjusted
to post-Iraq life. Others did not. One was upset when enlistments
were frozen by the Pentagon’s "stop-loss policies. "It
makes me angry to think that the army feels that it has the right
to extend people’s contracts," said one angry reservist about
the practice, "and hold them past their original orders. Who
do they think they are? And there’s nothin’ you can do about it,
you know." Marriages and family life were disrupted. Others
were concerned that, in spite of have served for two years, they
could be recalled at any time. Then, too, when the torture of Iraqi
prisoners in Abu Ghraib by another MP reserve unit was broadcast
to the world some of the 893rd reservists felt tainted,
abruptly thrust into a controversy for which they were entirely
unprepared. My guess is that some reservists – as many Americans
have doubted that only low-level MPs were responsible for Abu Ghraib,
especially in an administration as secretive and paranoid as the
Bush administration.
Musheno and
Ross conclude that the reservists had made "extraordinary sacrifices."
But it is reasonable for some to believe that after all they had
volunteered. Shouldn’t they then be required to fulfill their legal
duties? Hardly, the authors rightly insist, labeling reservists
the "New Conscripts of the Twenty-First-Century U.S. Army."
They do so, they write, because they want "to awaken the public
to their sacrifices and draw the attention of decision makers to
halt the abuse of reservist call-ups to sustain protracted wars
that are neither just nor in the interest of the United States."
Meanwhile,
Iraq and Afghanistan veterans – reservists and regulars alike –
have too often received shoddy hospital treatment (remember the
Walter Reed scandal?), received devastating wounds, and as the RAND
Corporation concluded in April 2008, twenty percent of returnees
are suffering from PTSD, possibly major depression and 19 percent
may have brain damage. A bill proposing a generous GI Bill flounders
in Congress in the face of Pentagon opposition and a threatened
presidential veto. On one visit to the 893rd reserve
center Musheno and Ross noticed photographs of George Bush and Donald
Rumsfeld on the wall but nothing was posted "about when, where
or how to seek help with the problems associated with either home-grown
or war-zone struggles."
While Deployed
is a notable addition to the literature of our persistent wars,
the real problem, remains, as the title of Martin Binkin’s 1993
book asked, Who
Will Fight the Next War?
Who, indeed?
Check out your local high school students and college underclassmen
as well as your own teenagers. They will, unless and until this
country’s historic addiction to war is somehow, in some way, cured.
This piece
originally appeared on George Mason University's History
News Network.org.
May
19, 2008
Murray
Polner [send
him mail] was
editor of Present Tense, published by the American Jewish
Committee from 1973–90. He wrote Rabbi:
The American Experience; co-edited (with Stefan Merken) Peace
Justice Jews: Reclaiming Our Tradition, as well as No
Victory Parades: The Return of the Vietnam Veteran and, with
Jim O’Grady, Disarmed
& Dangerous, a biography of Daniel and Philip Berrigan.
Copyright
© 2008 History News Network
Murray
Polner Archives
|