Providing
for Consideration of H.R. 7321, Auto Industry Financing and Restructuring
Act, before the House of Representatives, December 10, 2008.
I rise in opposition
to the rule and the underlying legislation. It doesn't take a whole
lot to convince me that we are on the wrong track with this type
of legislation. And at great risk of being marginalized, I want
to bring up a couple of issues. One is that if one were to look
for guidance in the Constitution, there's no evidence that we have
the authority to take funds from one group of Americans and transfer
it to another group who happen to need something.
And the moral
argument is it's not right to do so. Why should successful Americans
be obligated to take care of those who have made mistakes?
But those two
arguments in this Chamber are rather weak arguments, so I will try
to talk a little bit about economics. I think what we're doing here
today and what we've done here for the last week has been, essentially,
a distraction. We're talking about transferring funds around, $15
billion that's been authorized. It's been designated to do some
other interventions that were unnecessary in the car industry. And
in a way, this legislation probably could have been done by unanimous
consent, but there's been a lot of talk and a lot of publicity and
a lot of arguments going back and forth about the bailout for the
car companies; and it is, of course, very important.
But in the
scheme of things, you know, what's $15 billion mean anymore, especially
since it's been authorized?
The big thing
is the big bailout, the $8 trillion, the unlimited amount the Federal
Reserve has invested and what we've been doing for the past 6 months.
We are on the road to nationalization. In many ways, we're in the
midst of nationalization without a whimper.
There is no
real talk about it. I mean, we've essentially nationalized the insurance
companies, the mortgage companies, the banks, and medical care is
moving in that direction, and now the car companies are going to
be run by a car czar from this Congress. I mean, it is such an embarrassment.
It is such an insult to us who believe in freedom, who believe in
sound money and who believe in limited government. It is such an
insult to the whole idea of what made America great, and this is
what it has come to bailout after bailout after bailout
and nobody even calls it what it really is. It is the nationalization
of our industries.
You
know, in many ways, Harry Truman was a much more honest person.
He said we should nationalize the steel industry, and he did. Fortunately,
we still had a little bit of common sense in our courts, and they
said "Hey, you're going too far.'' That's what we're doing here.
We're nationalizing. It happens always for good purposes, and we
are always going to do good for this group, or that, but you never
ask the question "How much harm have you done to the other group?''
and that's what we ought to be talking about. We ought to really
find out what this is costing.
As much as
I strongly believe in the free society and I can defend it
from the economic viewpoint I also know where we are and
where we ought to go.
I do believe
in the transition. That is, if we need a bailout for the car companies,
even though I don't like the idea, if you could pay for it, take
it out of these hundreds of billions of dollars running the American
empire around the world. Cut it; bring it home and spend it here,
but running up these deficits is going to do us in, and we are working
on the collapse of the dollar. That is what you'd better pay attention
to. So pay attention. This is a lot more important than this little
$15 billion. To me, it has been a gross distraction from the great
harm we've done in the past 6 months.